U.S. ANALYSTS VIEW PLO CHIEF AS VACILLATOR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000100180006-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 18, 2010
Sequence Number: 
6
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 25, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000100180006-7.pdf95.07 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/18: CIA-RDP90-0055 ARTICLE APPEARED THE WASHINGTON POST ON PAGE_____ - 25 May 1982 STAT 2R000100180006-7 STAT 1manages to- maintain a three-day J.S. Analysts growth of beard at all times, the View PLO Chief his b grubby bb probably doesn't ne is a a cal realize that ru y appearance culat- As Vacillator ed effort to "add drama, to make Yassei Arafat is a vacillator and a compromiser, "an inadequate per- sonality who has received and seized opportunities 'to reach: a political power level that would not be gained had there been a contest"-for lead= ership of Palestinian-exiles. This is the conclusion of U.S in- him stand out from his Palestinian colleagues, who generally dress more Western and more conservatively," as the study puts it. Though his dark' glasses "make 'of Peter Sellers caricature of an Arab sheik, the - analysts conclude that Arafat's "cloak and' dagger move- ments, his striking and unforgettable telligence experts contained in a se- psychological faces will be admired cret psychological profile of* the Pal- only because they can b_ a many estine Liberation Organization lead- things to many people." er. My associate Indy Badhwar has ? Behind the facade lurks a weak, . had access to those'-rat stud which insecure person, torn by indecision, o g a a- thought, manipulated by his ' of irritation, not to the degree of lysts whose business it is to know ' associates. As a result, he expends. 'open attack; if that occurs,. he will why Arafat behaves as he does, and "as much psychic energy in mainte- retreat and compromise." what his response to changing cir- nance of his own position as he does . ? Essentially a moderate, Arafat i3 cumstances in the explosive Middle on the cause." bound to no [Palestinian] particular ideology 'East is likely to be. Arafat is essentially an actor, and other than establishing a Palestinian The question of peace or war in , his true power is hard to determine. state under his personal control. His the troubled region often turns as - "Whether he is fundament-all a A - real li" 1 f h f incapable of bold action or original Fors are carefully attuned to a degree retl~cts 0-A best 'ud ment y y . g power may , m contro o , e much on the personalities of a hand- urehead' cannot be determined in PLO's funds, rumored to be : kept in flit of tit' 1 1 d - o Ica ea the president and his policy advisers. other Arab leaders; they have differ- removed from a covert, guerrilla type Here are the highlights of the se- ing assessments of his political pow- to one in an elected or appointed cret Arafat psychological profile: er, his ability- to plan and recruit, position, Arafat would have a very ? Beyond wondering how Arafat and his effectiveness as_a leader...,.- ._..difficult adjustment." so makes the character appraisal of ? Arafat is regarded with mixed reached in the Middle East, "and the someone like Arafat so important to feelings by his PLO colleagues and pressure for the kind of behavior p ers as. on geopo- fact; that he is a person who would Arafat's own Swiss bank account. litical events over which they have quite willingly play that role, the - ? Though undoubtedly a skillful little or no control. That's what answer is probably yes." .. - survivor if a olitical t t' Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/18: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100180006-7 appearance, his series of changing him look ridiculous to some," a sort ? When he com'promises,I is not from the confidence of strength, but "probably because nuances of the political context escape his mind." The massive amount of information .,. he receives confuses Arafat, who has "less-than adequate capacity to'or- ganize and interpret it himself." So he sticks to a few simple, familiar themes and leaves the formation of new. ideas to others. ? It is oversimplification to ' de- scribe him as merely "weak,: vain, . . effeminate, crafty and silly," as'many have done. "There is more to Arafat than the general summary statement used by most Western writers, but there is less than some of his. com- rades see." - ? Arafat can be "ingratiating, ar- rogant and petty, but all such behav-