INTELLIGENCE FAILURE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000100260007-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 21, 2010
Sequence Number: 
7
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 19, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000100260007-7.pdf98.08 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/21 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000100260007-7 WALL STREET JOURNAL 19 March 1986 REVIEW & OUTLOOK ARTICLE APPEARED ON PAGE 30 .. Intelligence Failure Tomorrow the House will vote on President Reagan's request for mili- tary aid to the contras in Nicaragua. It will be a somber day whichever way the vote goes. The past few weeks' debate about Central America has unearthed a vast amount of igno- rance and arrogance about how the world works and what Americans must do to defend themselves and their values. A couple of weeks ago CIA Direc- tor William Casey said that Nicara- gua's Sandinista government was waging a disinformation campaign aimed at the congressmen who would soon vote on contra aid. The White House said it would release a declassi- fied version of the details. From the Hill came the roar of congressmen outraged at the sugges- tion that they could be duped by a for- eign government. Then the Washing- ton Post sprang forward with a scoop: Mr. Casey's "disinformation cam- paign" was actua v iust some consul- tants to the Sandinistas proposing a ublicit blitz with "language and tac- tics Simi ar to those of many of er legislative lobbying campaigns." You get the clever message? The Sandinista campaign is a legitimate lobbying effort. It is the administra- tion's attempt to discredit it that con- stitutes the deception. The White House decided not to release its infor- mation after all. After a while, you grow numb. Last night, public television's docu- mentary program "Frontline" sched- uled a pre-vote film about the contras titled "Who's Running This War?" The production had so much political spin on it that it almost achieved or- bit. In the film, contra leaders were Somocistas. The troops were blood- thirsty and ineffectual. Their U.S. sup- porters were bizarre right-wingers. We have gotten used to this stuff, but recently there has been a fresh shock. As Michael Ledeen details nearby, Alvaro Baldizon is a former Sandinista official who defected and came to this country eight months ago. Before his defection he served as chief investigator to the minister of the interior, Tomas Borge. Mr. Baldi- zon says he investigated, among other things, international charges of hu- man-rights abuse by the Sandinistas, to help the government answer them. He saw some of the innermost work- ings of the regime. In the U.S., Mr. Baldizon has been telling his story. Each new question asked of him elicits more tales of murder, terror and deception. A cou- ple of weeks ago Mr. Baldizon, an- swering one question, mentioned that he had direct knowledge of Sandinista soldiers disguising themselves as con- tras and committing atrocities in the contras' name. They were specially trained in East Germany. One group of them, said Mr. Baldizon, posed as counterrevolutionary peasants, killing Sandinista collaborators to prove their authenticity. They would join genuine contra bands, and in camp at night they would slit the throats of their new comrades-in-arms. The literature on communist military campaigns since World War II alludes to similar deceptions, but seldom has anyone come forth claiming firsthand knowl- edge of such events in progress. Yet Mr. Baldizon's revelations have hardly caused a ripple in the public debate. Mr. Baldizon's charges could of course be spurious, even though some of his other claims, as Mr. Ledeen re- ports, have been checked against the findings of human-rights groups. He has named names, dates and places. If his charges are true, the current debate about Nicaragua has been just a schoolchild's exercise, because the "facts" that people think they know have been manipulated with a deliber- ateness that we literally cannot imag- ine. No one has to believe Mr. Baldi- zon, but it is a remarkable phenome- non when, in the midst of a roaring debate, his charges are treated as if they were never made. This failing is part of a bigger one. Americans are truly innocent. There are some kinds of evil that we simply cannot believe, especially when disbelief is convenient for us. We are used to open political de- bate. We hate clandestine manipula- tion because it robs us of the reliable information that makes open debate possible. When we are told that such manipulation exists, we desperately try to avoid knowing it, so that we will not have to face its complications. It took a long time to convince peo- ple of the reality of the Holocaust. It took a long time for people to believe the horror of the Khmer Rouge. So far the U.S. has been lucky, and has made up for such failures of intelli- gence. But no one is lucky forever, and persisting in this self-satisfied ig- norance could sooner or later be fa- tal. STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/21 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000100260007-7