PRESIDENT EASES RESTRICTIONS ON GATHERING OF INTELLIGENCE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000100620079-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 13, 2010
Sequence Number: 
79
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 5, 1981
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000100620079-8.pdf122.53 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/13: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100620079-8 I_,TICLE APPEARED THE WASHINGTON POST OII PAGE_ L+ 5 December 1981 aJU By George Lardner Jr. wuhington Po., Staff wtiter President Reagan yesterday eased many of the restrictions imposed on L.S. intelligence agencies since the Mid-1970s when he signed an exec- utive order that he said is designed `to remove the aura of suspicion and mistrust that can hobble" their work. The 1 i -page order, which sup- plants one signed by President. Car- ter three years ago, authorizes the Central Intelligence Agency:_to use secret means to collect "significant foreign intelligence" from unsuspect- ing Americans here and abroad. it also will allow the agency to mount covert operations--in this country if they are designed to sup- port "objectives abroad" and are "not i txnded" to influence U.S. politics, polices or the news media. f he executive order. was issued after months of backstage 1debate, punctuated by periodic1eaks, about three earlier and more permissive. In a statement accompanying the Reagan said the final decree, order , had been carefully drafted "to main- taro the legal protection of all 'Amer- ican citizens" while- giving the'U.S., intelligence community clear wide- lines for its work. "Contrary to a distorted image that emerged during the last decade, there is no inherent conflict between the intelligence community and the rights of our citizens," Reagan de- Glared. "'T'his is not to say mistakes were never made and that vigilance against abuse is? unnecessary," he acknowledged. "But an approach' that emphasizes suspicion and mis- trust of our own intelligence efforts can undermine this nation's. ability. l to confront therincreasing challenge of espionage and terrorism." The order reportedly incorporates at least portions of about 15? of 18' changes recommended this fall by alarmed members of the House and Senate Intelligence committees, but lawmakers and civil libertarians nev- ertheless issued mixed reviews -yes- terday House ? Intelligence - Committee- Chairman Edward P. Boland (D= Mass.) said he is gratified that the order "retreats from the worst depar- tures from the Carter order" that had been proposed in earlier drafts. Boland said, he still is troubled by the provision for collection of "sig- nificant=-foreign intelligence" from American citizens even if they are not suspected of any wrongdoing or of employment by foreign powers.- Boland" promised closer monitoring by his committee to guard against excesses. The next few years, as the new order is implemented and inter- preted, will be important ones for the oversight committees. If we do our job properly, we will be in a po- sition to assure the American people that their rights are being safe- guarded," Boland said Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D- N.Y.), acting chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, made a sim- ilar point,- He said that he feels the! order makes it clear that the CIA's mission is abroad but that "there are a very few provisions ... which, if misinterpreted or stretched- beyond the legitimate intent of their au- thors, could pose some problems." - The most outspoken ' criticism came from Rep. Don Edwards (D- Calif.), who said his House Judiciary subcommittee . on constitutional rights would open hearings "right away." will be considered U S persons. The j "It's really patty bad," the former safeguards are now supposed to ex- FBI agent protested: "It still puts tend to all "permanent . resident the CIA smack into secretly operat- ;aliens" whether or not the INS ing within the United States ..: and `knows aboutthem. vWIUC vycti W burveulance, regardless of any connection'to foreign govern- ments or criminal activity." As a result of protests by the In- telligence committees, the White, House abandoned a proposal that!, would have permitted the CIA to infiltrate and to influence purely do-i mestic organizations. But the order would still-allow the CIA and other intelligence agencies, aside from the FBI, to infiltrate such organizations` for any one of a secret list of pur-1 poses to be prescribed by the attor- ney general. I Under.the Carter order, CIA in-j :filtration of domestic organizations i was limited to a publicly stated set of purposes including recruitment of agents, development of cover, and undercover participation in technical society meetings not open to the f general public. - _- . - : 11 Reagan's order also differs from that of Carter in these respects: - - - e It changes the flat rule requiring ...the head of the CIA and all other intelligence agencies to report to the attorney general evidence of possible, violations of federal law by their em-1 ployes. Instead, such reports are to r be made only when they would not-' interfere "with. the protection of in- telligence sources and methods." e It revises the definition of "U.S. ! persons" -whose rights are' to be protected. Officials said the safeguards no longer will extend to U.S. corpo- rations "directed and controlled by,, foreign governments," such as the Soviet trading company, Amtorg. In addition, because of the short- i .comings of Immigration and Natu-? ralization Service records, . only j "known permanent resident aliens" Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/13: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100620079-8