IN YURCHENKO CASE, TRUTH REMAINS A COVERT FACTOR

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000100660009-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 28, 2010
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 10, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000100660009-1.pdf289.76 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100660009-1 :" I.r. M Y.Ai'SC11 I WH01711114lsTU1V rvor CN PAGE _' 10 November 1985 In Yurchenko Case, Truth Remains a Covert Factor A Genuine Defector, or a Soviet Plant? By Dale Russakoff Washington Post Staff Writer On Aug. 1, Vitaly Yurchenko slipped into the U.S. Embassy in Rome with one goal: he wanted a new life. Frustrated by a stagnant spy career in Moscow, despairing over failed relationships with his wife and son, lovesick for a Russian mistress in Canada, he would "dis- appear," and secretly defect to the country most eager to buy what he had to sell. Or: On Aug. 1, Vitaly Yurchenko slipped into the U.S. Embassy in Rome to set off the most dazzling "sting" operation in modern espio- nage history. Reeling from recent defections of key Soviet agents to the West, infuriated by American gloating, desperate for an intelli- gence coup of its own. the Soviet government would plant Yurchenko as bait in a trap timed to snap shut before a worldwide audience, turn- ing U.S. exhilaration to embarrass- ment. Which version is true? In spy sto- ries of this kind, truth is a rare com- modity. An intelligence analyst would ask, which version is most credible? A layman might reply that Yurchenko's three-month odyssey through the U.S. intelligence appa- ratus and out of it again was totally incredible, even mind-boggling. "You could sit two people down with exactly the same set of facts, and they would come up with op- posite conclusions: He was a double agent; no, he was a defector who became depressed," said Sen. David L. Boren (D-Okla.), a member of the Select Committee on Intelli- gence. "I can argue it round or I can argue it flat. It comes down to your own intuition." Even the consequences are un- clear. Some U.S. officials say Yurchenko spilled valued information. Others say he gave and took little. Maybe he was just a bird that flew into the jet engine: a freak accident, not a systemic fail- ure. At the least, he escorted a wide-eyed world into the secret and seductive realm of espionage, where the bizarre and unexpected are common- place, where the most skilled practitioner is prone to see the implausible as plausible, the un- real as real. In this realm, illogic harbors a logic all its own. The tale is beyond logic, from Yurchenko's disappearance in Rome to his tete-a-tete over supper with America's chief spymaster in Lang- ley, Va., to an unprecedented, internationally televised news conference in Washington, where he said he was drugged and kidnaped? Here is the tale, told twice, of V.S. Yurchenko: once as genuine defector, once as double agent. The facts are the same, only the motivation- and therefore the interpretation-changes. The motivations offered here were suggested by in- telligence officials and experts, but they are largely guesswork. 'In time, more facts may emerge to make one version markedly more persuasive, or that intro- duce a new explanation, such as the intriguing scenario that Yurchenko was deliberately sent back to Moscow by the Central Intelligence Agency as a triple agent. The Genuine Defector Yurchenko. 49, was entering middle age, un- happy in love and in work. His heart belonged to a woman in Ottawa, the wife of a Soviet Embassy official whom he had known since the 1970s. According to the CIA, he was listed as No. 2 in the KGB department overseeing spying in North America, but his career was arguably going no- where. He was the security officer, an inglorious watchdog. It was not the kind of life he might have en- visioned in the late 1970s, when he was the feared chief of security at the Soviet Embassy in Washington and a sort of man-about-town known as "Vity" to bartenders in posh downtown hotels. If he was looking for a way out, the Soviets un- knowingly gave him one last July. They sent him to Rome to investigate the disappearance of nu- clear scientist Vladimir Alexandrov, last seen in Madrid in April. While strolling with Soviet officials on the hot summer morning of July 28 (according to Italian press accounts), he excused himself near the am- bassador's residence, saying he wanted to tour the Vatican museum on nearby Via delle For- naci. He never came back. Coat as,d STAT STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100660009-1 0 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP9O-00552ROO0100660009-1 :.y, Yurchenko had reason to believe he was on contract-$1 million down and $62,500 a year the threshold of a new life, with plenty of money for life in return for information, according to and security, and perhaps his sweetheart to boot. Yurchenko-but he put them off. And he was counting on his new protectors at Heartsick, lonely for someone to whom he the CIA, as fellow espionage types. to keep it all could open his soul-in Russian-Yurchenko's secret so that his superiors, his wife and most thoughts may have turned to his adopted son, importantly his 16-year-old son would not know who had difficulty in school and was a discipline that he had abandoned the Soviet motherland. problem. The evidence would show that he had "disap- He knew that some defectors had been al- peared." a plausible end for a KGB agent. lowed home after declaring they were kidnaped Soviet Embassy officials reported Yurchenko and drugged, then swearing unswerving loyalty missing on Aug. 2, providing Italian police with a to the motherland. Maybe he, too, could pull it description, but no photograph. and saying they off. suspected the CIA had kidnaped him. By Sep- The debriefers by mid-October had relaxed his tember, Soviet officials here queried the United security, emphasizing that he was free to go any- States on Yurchenko's whereabouts. where. On Saturday, Nov. 2, Yurchenko was as. Meanwhile, U.S. officials whisked their prize signed a fairly new employe, a young and inex- defector to Washington under Attorney General perienced agent who agreed to take him to Au Edwin Meese III's "parole power" for emergency Pied de Cochon, a Georgetown brasserie, 1' immigrations, and installed him in a "safe house" miles from the Soviet compound on Tunlaw Road on 10 acres about 90 minutes south of Washing- NW. ton. As they finished their dinner about 8 p.m., Then, the debriefings began, and the CIA Yurchenko looked at the young agent, said he quickly found that Yurchenko was a good catch. wanted to take a walk, and asked, ,if I walk He exposed Edward Lee Howard. a former away, will you shoot me?" CIA agent fired from the agency who then. be- Of course not, came the answer. This is Amer- trayed to the Soviets a valued U.S. source in ica. Moscow. He told them about three other Amer- Perhaps out of fatherly feeling toward a young icans who had worked for Soviet intelligence, agent, perhaps out of anger at his debriefers, he some sources say. He cleared up a decade-old parted with these words: if I don't come back, don't mystery by revealing that the Soviets had acci- blame yourself." dentally killed U.S. double agent Nicholas G. And with that, Yurchenko vanished. Shadrin in 1975. But the debriefings became emotionally de- He made his way through the big iron gates of the pleting and ultimately depressing-normal feel- Soviet compound, apparently recognized by old friends ings, according to other defectors. Day after day, from his days in Washington. According to intelligence professional questioners picked Yurchenko's sources, embassy officials likely consulted senior au- brain. He later complained that he had to speak thorities in Moscow, possibly even the Politburo, to de- English all the time, an added strain. cide how to treat this traitorous defector. At night, he said later, he had to sleep with his It was Yurchenko who proposed a news conference, door open under the watchful eye of a "fat, quiet, according to a Soviet official. It seemed a clever way to stupid-excuse me-unemotional person who is discredit the United States. The Soviets initially following the orders." During the day, he planned to hold it on Sunday, but realized that football claimed, he was watched much of the time by six games frequently preempt Sunday network news shows 1 CIA officers, including a Vietnam veteran named and that the publicity would be better on Monday, the Colin Thompson, who called himself "Charlie." Soviet official added. Within weeks, his new life in the United States The turncoat Yurchenko surely could be trusted with began to look worse than the one left behind. this unprecedented assignment because as an old KGB Both Soviet and American sources agree that hand, he knew his life was riding on it. Yurchenko, while in U.S. custody, was treated And so, Yurchenko played his part like a master last for an ulcer-"All of us have stomach trouble Monday afternoon, accusing the United States of "state say y the mhermost t official commonly said-and nly pre- - terrorism." But there was a tantalizing clue to his real medical l authorities over a Soviet scribed ulcer medication could have caused the thinking. When a reporter asked how he escaped, Yur- defector to feel disoriented and confused. chenko answered by talking of his son, convincing some In late September, with the help of the Royal skilled observers he was going home for the boy: Canadian Mounted Police, the CIA reunited Yur- "I have a 16-year-old son and he had his problems chenko in Ottawa with his beloved. But the wo- with his studies and with his behavior .... I used to man spurned him, and Canadian sources ob- tell him that there can be no situation without an exit. If served him to be "emotionally upset" after the you really think about it you can always find a way out visit. of any situation." Meanwhile, far from keeping his defection a secret. U.S. officials crowed about him. Some- The Double Agent how, his role in the Shadrin and Howard cases peaked to the news media. He had a private din- Soviet intelligence officials were desperate. Both the 1ner with CIA Director William J. Casey, and Yur- London station chief of the KGB and the deputy direc- chenko saw it reported in a Newsweek magazine tor of Soviet intelligence in Greece had defected to the article calling Yurchenko "the highest-ranking West. Americans had boasted that it was like losing two Soviet defector in years" and quoting a "senior CIA station chiefs to Moscow. administration aide" boasting, "He's for real." With the summit near, the Soviets urgently wanted On Oct. 11, after newspapers and television to epibarrass the United States, shake CIA confidence networks had been flooded with news of the Yur- in their newly won defectors and stanch any future chenko defection, the State Department an- westward flow of intelligence. nounced it officially. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP9O-00552ROO0100660009-1 STAT STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100660009-1 J They concocted a plot of rare audacity: plant a de- fector in the United. States, manipulate the Americans into believing he is one of the KGB's top five officials, give him a few choice intelligence tidbits to divulge to enhance his cover, but mainly pump him full of disinfor- mation. Once the Americans take the bait, he escapes in a spectacular surprise ending, staging an unheard-of Washington news conference, leaving even some of the most skilled observers believing he was a real defector who "redefected." And who better for the job than Vitaly Yurchenko? He was as plausible a defector as any-competent in English, with an un-Russian, man-about-town air. He would tell his CIA handlers that he had tired of Soviet life and of an unsatisfactory marriage, and that he had liked the freedoms of America. To sweeten the story, the Soviets would fabricate for him a love affair in Ottawa with an embassy wife. Intel- ligence types always believed that love, more than ide- olggy, moved people to defect. - ~Yurchenko was also as tough as they came. He struck terror into embassy employes ffere as security chief from 1975 to 1979-a watchdog against defectors. And - in any case, he did not have the kind of job that gave him access to the sort of information the Soviets most feared losing. So off he went to Rome, into the U.S. Embassy. Everything went as planned. The United States agreed to Yurchenko's basic demands fora new life, a reunion with his sweetheart in Ottawa and utmost se- crecy-with the Soviets knowing full well that in the open U.S. system, the news would leak. As arranged, Yurchenko turned in Howard, who was believed to be of no more use to the Soviets. Howard escaped, apparently thanks to U.S. bungling. And Yur- chenko explained Shadrin's mysterious 1975 disappear- ance, but that was only a footnote to history, anyway. Still, U.S. officials trumpeted these as major intelli- gence coups, and in return, intelligence officers took Yurchenko in late September to Ottawa to see his lov- er. She spurned him as planned, possibly receiving in the process a valuable report on his first weeks with the Americans that she passed on to Moscow. Meanwhile, the leaks in the media went beyond even the Soviets' wildest imaginings. They surfaced in so many different places, billing Yurchenko as such a big "catch"-all on the authority of unnamed intelligence sources-that the ombudsman of The Washington Post publicly chided the newspaper for failing to report Yur- chenko's defection as prominently as its competitors. Then Yurchenko hit the ultimate propaganda jackpot: an intimate meeting with CIA Director Casey in his pri- vate dining room. Before long, this meeting also was leaked by gloating intelligence sources, setting the Rea- gan administration up for a bruising fall: America's chief spy dining intimately with a Soviet plant. Everything was in place for the grand finale. Know- ing the CIA ultimately wanted to let him exercise his new freedom, Yurchenko persuaded his young handler to drive him into Georgetown, on the drizzly night of Nov. 2. At a noisy all-night bistro called Au Pied de Co- chon, where one can easily get lost amid the crowds and the eclectic, Franco-Washingtonian decor, he excused himself for a walk. He was welcomed back to the Soviet compound as a hero, and preparations were made for Monday's news conference in which he would charge that he had been drugged and kidnaped in Rome, then held prisoner. Ev- ery major news organization in the country by now knew Yurchenko's name and would give the session top billing. Yurchenko, the star witness, appeared to have noth- ing to fear. This was hardly a defector, terrorized as to whether he would be executed or spared. This man was so composed that he brushed aside the third-ranking of- ficial in the embassy who sought to end the briefing be- fore Yurchenko was through talking. "Don't try to press me. I am used to such pressing .... It doesn't work against me," Yurchenko told a re- porter who questioned his story. Then he peremptorily called an end to the questioning. "Thank you for your time," he said smiling. "Bye- bye." Staff writer Patrick E.. Tyler, Canada correspondent Herbert H. Denton and staff researchers Barbara Feinman and James Schwartz contributed to this report. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/28: CIA-RDP90-00552R000100660009-1