SENATE VOTES TO BAR IDENTIFICATION OF SECRET AGENTS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000201080014-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 11, 2010
Sequence Number: 
14
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 18, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000201080014-7.pdf125.24 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/11: CIA-RDP90-00552R000201080014-7 . P.RTICL?E 1UPPEARED ON PAGE NW YORK TIMES 18 M-aRCH 1982 Si&-nate Vote :,',BY DAVID SHRISMAN teli.igence Agency officers by Philip Spedwto w'iewYo rmx'es Agee, a former agency employee who WASHINGTON, March 17-The yen- has written books about the agency, and ate-today joined the House of Repre by assertions by American intelligence sentatives in approving an amendment . officials that the identification of agents thatnwould make it illegal for individu restricted their activities or exposed als,_.?ircluding journalists, to identify themtophysicalharm a American intelligence agents if they had "reason to believe" that the disclo- BushLobbled for Amendzaent sure would harm American intelligence Today's approval of ccthe. Chafee activides- amendment to the intelligence identi The amendment, which was offered ties protection act came after an in- by SenatorJohn H. Chafee; Republican tense lobbying effort by theAdrninistra. of Rhode Island, would make it a crime ti.on? Vice President Bush, himself a for- to hgage in a "pattern of activities" mer Director of Central intelligence, that' would identify American intelli- presided over the vote and was credited gene personnel. The measure passed by. supporters of the amendment for by'a55to 39 margin. winning at least six uncommitted votes. language tden- The action was swiftly condemned by In approving y press and public interest: groups. John tl aT'fo that passed in the House in late H. F. Shattuck, Washington director of September, the Senate adopted a less the American Civil Liberties Union, stringent standard for. prosecution than called the approval of the amendment is J4 'ciary Committee had recom "a devastating blow to freedom of the mended. Under the version passed press" and said his group was prepared todat;' Which has strong White House for court action to challenge it. suppovt, reporters could be prosecuted - The bill provides for a fine of as much even; i they did not intend to "impair or as $15,000 and three years' imprison- impede" American intelligence activi- I ment. es; ,ti-' "y The , language that was adopted Tl l measure, which was aimed at al earlier by the Judiciary Committee, by ual because it could expose to prosecu-' tion those who publish the identity of an agent in the course of an article that was, not intended to jeopardize Ameri. can intelligence activities or expose an- American agent to physical harm. Senator Chafee said the bill posed no -threat to general l-scirculation newspa- pers and magazines: "I don't think the C.I.A. is going to go around trying to nab everybody," he said. ''The legiti- mate press has always showii: tremen- dous restraint." But Jack C. Landau,'director of they Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press, one of the groups that has led the battle 'against : the Chafee amendment, said the measure was "un- constitutional "'ws: "The First Amendment only permits, the conviction and jailing of news peo-j pie for publishing information whichl ..does a direct, immediate and irrepara- ble injury to the national security," he said, "and does not permit prosecutions .for disclosing information which is merely embarrassing or causes some discomfort to the Government. " The Senate still was considering an amendment from Senator Bill Bradley, Democrat of New Jersey, that would re- strict prosecution to those engaged in a "pattern of activities" whose "mam?dia rection" is "to identify and expose coy ??I ertagents." The intelligence identities protection act is all bit certain"to be passed in this Cone'. +'. ...s.,;s s"r t 1 series of intelligence newsletters " but ! a 9-to 8 vote, was directed. at persons I woufodaffect the general press as well, who identified American: intelligence was_pXompted by the disclosure of the. personnel "with intent to impair or im- identities of more than i,000 Central In. , pede foreign intelligence activities" of theUnited States..... : ?,, ?~..; ., The concept of outlawing the publica= tion of agents. names has broad support on Capitol Hill. The debate focused in-- stead on the Chafee proposal, which called for prosecution of-,lany person: who, in course of pattern of activities in- tended::to identify and .expose covert agents and with reason.to believe such activities would impair..orimpede for- eign. intelligence activities" of -the United States or "discloses identity of a; covert agent:', . , ,L; CrltlcsSayTooEasytoConvict_ ;i Critics of the Proposal said. that the "reason to believe' standard : would' makelit=.too easy to cnnvict4n individ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/11: CIA-RDP90-00552R000201080014-7 i STAT