REAGAN ORDERED CASEY TO KEEP IRAN MISSION FROM CONGRESS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000202230003-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 23, 2010
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 15, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000202230003-1.pdf177.06 KB
Body: 
1 yf ~ WASHINGTON POST ? ~-j"-"r 15 November 1986 Reagan Ordered Casey to Keep Iran Mission From Congress Witten Notice Conflicted With CIA Chief's Pledge Approved For Release 2010/12/23: CIA-RDP90-00552R000202230003-1 By Bob Woodward W.i hni ton Poit Staff Writer President Reagan in mid-January ordered CIA Director William J. 04f Casey in writing not to inform con- gressional intelligence committees of a covert action involving the ship- ment of arms to Iran and release of American hostages in Lebanon, in- formed sources said yesterday. As part of his Iran policy, Reagan signed a secret presidential intel- ligence order on Jan. 17, formally authorizing the covert operation, the sources said. Senior administra- tion officials yesterday said the president has full legal authority to begin sensitive covert operations without giving prior notice to Con- gress, although several key Repub- lican and Democratic members of Congress sharply disagreed. After the 1984 controversy over the Central Intelligence Agency's mining of Nicaraguan harbors, Casey had pledged in writing to in- form the Senate and House intel- ligence committees within 48 hours of any intelligence activities or co- vert actions approved by the pres- ident. Sources said the president issued the written order to Casey in an attempt to protect his intelligence chief from the anticipated wrath of Congress, which is now preparing several inquiries into the presi- dent's controversial Iran policies. Since the administration first took office in 1981, Casey has had nu- merous public run-ins with the con- gressional intelligence committees. The White House and Casey wanted to avoid another, the sources said. "Casey's hands are clean on this one," one source said yesterday. Since the revelations of intelli- gence abuses in the mid-1970s, Congress has virtually guaranteed WILLIAM J. CASEY ... said to be "clean on this one" the public that there will be thor- ough oversight of intelligence op- erations. But one Republican sen- ator yesterday said the Senate Se- lect Committee on Intelligence is now confronted with a "serious lapse" in its oversight responsibility because it was unaware of the op- eration for 10 months. Since at least part of Reagan's Iranian policy was conducted under a formally, approved covert action, the policy falls into an arena where Congress has laws and committees to fully investigate. The president's national security adviser, Vice Adm. John M. Poin- dexter, yesterday defended the de- cision to keep the covert operation from Congress because of extreme sensitivity of contacts with Iran and potential danger to American hos- tages. In a luncheon meeting with re- porters and editors at The Wash- ington Post, Poindexter said he kept the one-page presidential in- telligence order, called a "finding," in his White House office safe and that its existence and contents were known only to a handful of admin- istration officials. "The president has signed an in- telligence finding that authorizes this program, and that finding only existed in its original form in my safe," Poindexter said. "The finding, in terms of its ob- jectives, is very similar to the ob- jectives that the president gave in his speech [Thursdayl night," he added. In his televised speech on the Iran controversy, Reagan said he had authorized the secret diplomacy to gain "access and influence" in [ran, end the Iran-Iraq war and re- duce terrorism. Without elaborat- ing, Poindexter also indicated that the finding made reference to arms and the release of hostages. Poindexter said the administra- tion determined that the Intelli- gence Oversight Act, which gov- erns intelligence operations, spe- cifically acknowledges the presi- dent's constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs. The act an- ticipates extraordinary circum- stances when the congressional in- telligence committees will not be informed of a covert operation in advance, he said. The law only requires that when prior notification is withheld, "the president shall fully inform the in- telligence committees in a timely fashion . and shall provide a statement of the reasons for not giving prior notice." Poindexter said such a notifica- tion and explanation was being giv- en to the committees, even though it is 10 months since Reagan au- thorized the operation which Poin- dexter said specifically involved the CIA. The Senate intelligence commit- tee was informed yesterday of the presidential finding, but two sena- tors on the panel said the 10-month delay was totally unacceptable and subverted the spirit of congression- al oversight of intelligence opera- tions. "How many more 'findings' of se- cret operations are there in Poin- dexter's safe?' asked one Republi- can senator, who declined to be identified because he said he has not yet seen the Iranian finding or been briefed on the matter. Other sources said the Senate committee will hold closed hearings on the matter soon, particularly examining the question of the fund- ing for the Iranian covert action. Under the law, the CIA can only spend funds authorized by Con- gress, and sources said no money was authorized for the Iranian op- eration. The House plans to open hearings on the Iran controversy Nov. 21. Approved For Release 2010/12/23: CIA-RDP90-00552R000202230003-1 Approved For Release 2010/12/23: CIA-RDP90-00552R000202230003-1 The existence of a 10-month co- vert operation about which Con- gress was oblivious clearly sur- prised and even shocked some in- telligence committee members yes- terday. "The assumption was that this couldn't and wouldn't happen,"' one source said. Poindexter said yesterday that he was aware of Casey's agreement with the Senate committee, but that the leeway on notification written into the law by Congress permitted the administration to act as it had. A January 1985 report of the Senate intelligence committee said, "On June 6, [1984, director of cen- tral intelligence] Casey, with the approval of the president, signed a written agreement with the com- mittee setting forth procedures for compliance with the statutory re- quirements of the Intelligence Oversight Act for reporting covert action activities to the intelligence committees." Sources said that Casey only signed that agreement under re- peated pressure from the committe chairman at that time, Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Ariz.), and then-vice chairman, Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.). Because Casey was reluctant to sign the agreement, the commit- tee's chief counsel was sent to CIA headquarters to get Casey's signa- ture in June 1984, officials said. Nonetheless, both intelligence and congressional sources said that the agreement, often called the "Casey Accords," has been one of the guiding documents in the rela- tionship between the CIA and Con- gress in the last two years. It was updated this year, according to of- ficials. When it was signed, the Senate intelligence committee said in a statement that the agreement was "an important development which should reduce the chances for a rep- etition of the kind of problem and misunderstanding" that developed from the 1984 Nicaraguan harbor mining. Staff researcher Barbara Feinman contributed to this report. Approved For Release 2010/12/23: CIA-RDP90-00552R000202230003-1