MOYHIHAN WILL SEEK TO ELIMINATE PRESS PENALTIES IN INTELLIGENCE BILL

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000404440193-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 29, 2010
Sequence Number: 
193
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 21, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000404440193-4.pdf84.7 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/29: CIA-RDP90-00552R000404440193-4 ZZ/ NEW YORK TIME S 21 FEBRUARY 1980 over the Soviet Union in 1960. If such a 1 ynihan WillSee to E `i ina a i law had been in effect then, Mr. Abrams r , said, every publication that used Mr.. Powers's name would have been subject Proms Penalties in In re. 0 1 Y a ,? 111. to criminal prosecution even though the By IRVIN MOLOTSKY Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, Feb. 20 - Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan said today that he would seek to remove from a pending intelligence bill a section making it a criminal act for the press to disclose the -names of intelligence agents. - Senator Moynihan, a New York Demo- cratwho is a member of the Senate's Se- lect Committee on Intelligence and a sponsor of the measure, said that he would move to strike the section when the committee met tomorrow to take up pro- posed changes in intelligence laws. The Senator said in an interview that he had become convinced of the undesira- bility of providing penalties for the press after discussing.it with Floyd Abrams, the New York lawyer who has made a specialty of First Amendment cases. Such a provision "might have a chilling effect," Senator Moynihan said, adding: "We have almost always decided those close cases on the side of accepting the risks of disclosure as being preferable to any inhibition on the freedom of the press to publish." Asked why he had introdu4d the mat- ter in the first place, the Senator said he had done so to speed Congressional action on measures concerning the Central In- telligence Agency and other intelligence matters. "We simply took the House com- mittee bill, which had been introduced al- - ready,"hesaid. Open to Discussion Of the part establishing criminal liabil- ity for the press, Senator Moynihan said that he had commented earlier that ex- pressions of concern were a "fair point" and that "if there is a problem we will talk about it." That there was a problem became ap- parent when editors and lawyers com- plained about it, with Mr. Abrams telling a House of Representatives committee last month that the press measure would be "flatly and facially unconstitutional." Mr. Abrams cited as an example the case of Francis Gary Powers, the pilot of the U-2 reconnaissance alane shot down Soviet Union had disclosed the incident and was holding Mr. Powers in custody. The rest of the proposed measure, re- mains intact, Senator Moynihan said. One.section would reduce from eight to two the number of Congressional com- mittees that oversee C.I.A. activities. Intelligence Bodies Exempted Another part would exempt the Central ! Intelligence Agency and other intelli- gence bodies from most provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. Senator; Moynihan said that it was "absurd" to allow "an agent of the K.G.B." to seek in- telligence under the act. While he ac- knowledged that no agent of the Soviet in- telligence organization had apparently; actually obtained such information, he asserted that such applications had been made by Polish officials. The third part of the measure contains' two parts - the press section that Mr. Moynihan will seek to strike and another' one that he'will retain. The latter would; make it a crime for a present or former intelligence agency official, or'anyone else with authorized access to the names' of undercover agents, to divulge those: names. !I Thus, if the bill passes in the form the! Senator intends, the person giving the: names to a publication could be prose-i cuted but the publication that printed; them could not. Asked? to assess the likelihood of suc-j ! cess in removing the press provision,; Senator Moynihan said that he, thought his request would do "pretty well." Mr. Moynihan actually signaled his change of position in a Senate speech Feb. 8 in which he reported Mr. Abrams's concern about the press proposals. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/29: CIA-RDP90-00552R000404440193-4