CRACKING A SOVIET CIPHER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000605590009-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 19, 2010
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 19, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000605590009-9.pdf193.03 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/19 :CIA-RDP90-005528000605590009-9 tL~ZTi,I,L ~!tP,vGl1RED ;:'. ~~~+SWEK Q.~J PAGEy, 19 ,~laY ~a80 ~~r .. Tite Rosenher,~s in .I9.S.f: U.S. code brenkerrpickad up o trail leading to them R ^t~'' he first clue landel on Hobert Latn- y~, phere's dek in t,~~ counterespiona,t: section at FBI headqu~u-tcrs in the spring of 1948. Just fiveorsi,e ~vords, it was a det:udeti Fragment of a much longer rnt-sage sent by radio fburyears earlierf'ram the Soviet Con- sulateinNew York to I%ti 8lre"ices; included in the haul were the plain-text versions of en- cipheredmessages that had previously been intercepted by U.S. authorities. With three parts of the puzzle in their possession-the code-book remnants, the encrypted mes- sages an.~i the plain text of those messages- U.S. cryptanalysts could then figure out the value of the additives. Approach: The job was a tedious one, and it wasn't until the spring of 1948 that the FB I began to get results. One ofthe first messages to be deciphered vas a 1944 report by a KGB agent in New York that an unnamed Soviet spy had approached a Navy Department employee named Max Elitcher and an engi- neernamedJoel Barr in an effort toget them to start feeding information to the Soviets. The FBI put Elitcher and Barr under inves- tigation, bttt the bureau learned nothing of interest. Thenext year, however, in the summer of 1949, cryptanalysts read another KGB message that turned out to be a verbatim copy of atop-secret report written by Brit- ish scientist Klaus Fuchs while he was part of the team working on the Manhattan Project at Los Alamos. Interrogated by British authorities, Fuchs confessed that he had been spying for the Russians, and he named Philadelphia chemist Harry Gold as his contact man. In turn, Gold led the FBI to David Greenglass, a U.S. Army machin- Grecnglass finoer:-d his brother-in-law, Jul- ius Rosenberg, as t:!e leader of the soy ring. Rosenberg denied working for the Y.GB. ! But it turned out That he had gone to colleaC i with the two men mentioned in the 1944 KGB messages-Elitcher and Barr. Barr had disappeared, but Elitcher admitted that Rosenber;had asked l~im to spy for the Russians in 1944. Rosenberg conceded that he had visited Elitcher in 194=}, but insisted he was only an old school chum. The j decoded message supported Elitcher's ver- ~ Sion by placing a Soviet spy at his house at the same time Rosenberg admitted being there. Similarly, another KGB message supported testimony by Greenglass t}tat Rosenberg had told him that Barr was one I of his espionage.:contacts.:The decoded messages didn't prove that Rosenberg was a spy, but they did draw the circumstantial net around him tightly enoug`- to convince U.S. authorities of his guilt. Rosenberg never knew about the incrimi- nating messages. And the government, with the evidence from Greenglass and ; others in hand, did not need to introduce the deciphered messages at the trial and did not want the Soviets to know the code had been broken. But it now seems that the i KGB had learned of the breach almost immediately. Kim Philby-the British double went, who currently lives in Mos- cow-was the British liaison with the CIA and FBI in Washington at the time, and he received copies of deciphered KGB mes- sages. "He used to sit across from me in FBI headquarters and discuss some ofthe infor- I motion from this source," says Lamphere. In any case, the Soviet Union changed its entire cipher system in 1948. `iliole': On the basis of the 1944 and 1945 KGB messages they were able to read, U.S. counterintelligence agents drew a bead not only on Fuchs and theRosenbergs, but on a number of other spies as well-among them Philby himself and Donald Maclean, who served as second secretary in the British Embassy in Washington in the late 1940s. i They also learned from a deciphered 1945 1 message that the Soviets had a spy in the American delegation to the Yalta Confer- ence; the message gaveno hint as to who the "mole" might be, but one member of that ~ . delegation was Alger Hiss, who had been f accused of espionage. For all its detail, the disclosure of the 30- ~ year-old code break is not likely to settle the ` Rosenberg controversy. The questions of whether the Rosenbargs received a fair 1 trial-and whether execution was the ap- propriate penalty for their crimes-will continue to be debated. But the story of the broken cipher unquestionably strengthens the case against the Rosenbergs-and adds a bit of luster to the reputation of the nation's counterinkelligence forces. ALLAN J. bfAYER with DAVID G 1.iARTIN ~' /inWashinatnn Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/08/19 :CIA-RDP90-005528000605590009-9