IN DEFENSE OF LYING

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00552R000606120049-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 2, 2010
Sequence Number: 
49
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 25, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00552R000606120049-5.pdf98.4 KB
Body: 
STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000606120049-5 V i AKWU APPEARED ON PAGE _ 4 _2 _ In social We it is called etiquette. In personal fife it is called hypocrisy. In political life it is called diplomacy. Amer- icons tacdmslp persist in calling it by its- generic name: lying. Americans have a toieran ce for many tbi>gaA, Lying in pub- IiG1'~ not one of them. Taloe We weds From all the hand- wringng, you could be forgiven for thinking that the worst lion in the Adile horn affair was not that ter- rorists shot an old man or that Italy let the ringleader go., but that for eight hours Egypt's President Mubsrak Bed about the whereabouts of the terrorists. For this misdemeanor, the Egypdm ambassador was subjected to a croes- eaaroioation an -N%~ ~ ' of the sort not seep since. some hapless witness de- cided to perjure bin" blare Edward Bennett WMams. (Certidy nothingd the sort was encountered by Yaseer Arafat on the sannle show.) Caught in a Be, the ambassador tried to slip away. Alas, be could run but he couldn't hide. Muberak, on the other hand, took the first opportunity to admit to "a dipiomuatic deception." Rather than regret, he evinced sur- prise that anyone should have taken much notice, let alone offense. After all, he has more important things to worry about than-passing the Water- gate truth test. For starters: the stability of his regime, on which hangs the security of 46 million people. Caught between fanatic Islamic funda- mentalists, on the one hand, and angry American allies, on the other, he de- cided that the better part of valor was an eight-hour Be. Big deal. But for Americans, famous for their frankness, and not yet jundkoed by cen- turies of statecraft, it is a big daL It has been known since 1604 that an ambes- sailor is an honest man sent abroad to he far the commonwealth. Yet after two centuries at the game, Americans have yet to get used to the ida. We have the contrary view that in diplomacy truth- telling is always a virtue. It is a charm- ing and expensive indulgence that only a young country can believe and only a big country can afford. Not that the United States has not told some whoppers. There was U-2 Be. WASHINGTON POST 25 October 1985 In Defense of Lying Charles Krauthammer Thinking the pilot dead and the plane destroyed, the Eisenhower State De- partment put out the story that the U-2 was an off-course weather plane. And there was ? Adlei Steveneoa's be about the Bay of Pigs. Lied to by the CIA, be told the . Security Council that the United States had nothing to do with the invasion. After Vietnam and Water- gate, native American revulsion with political lying peaked: in 1976 a presi- dent was elected on a platform of truth- telfsng and little else. But lying can be so indispensable, that not even President Carta could. do without it. In advance of the Iran rescue mission, Jody Powell planned a cover story (about a possible block- ade), and, when Jack Nelson of the Los Angeles Times got wind of a mission, Powell used it and categorically denied any plans for a rescue. Even then there were some who carped that Powell should have issued a "no com- ment" rather than a denial, so as not to allow a true he to pass his lips. Of course, a "no comment" would have aroused suspicions and jeopardized lives. For some reporters, however, credibility is the greater sm. They said Powell should resign. Now the good news. We may . b_e armmto relax. A note of maturity has alleged UrA lbe was year, invdwnent in a m ? If the CIA denies somet nn its here ote? not `false, ' but all its own, a category : tween' tries prepered to ad in We MOM n=- or n5lFSEW-was ire l*edmally w had delivered a lesson in old worn statecraft. old notion at deniatility. like world statecraft, is foreign to Amer- ican sensibilities Nevertheless, deni- ability is quite valuable to American di- plomacy. Why, for example, is so much Reagan Doctrine aid to anticommunist guerrillas "covert'? The te;m seems both ludicrous (Can't everyone read about it in The Washington Post?) and sinister (Is the government trying to hide something from the electorates. In fact, the major purpose of "secret" aid to, say, Afghan guerrillas is not to hide the facts from Americans (or Rua- sign, for that matter. they subscribe to The Poet, too), but to provide protective comer to our allies. Pakistan funnels oar aid to the Afghan insurgents, but is too vulnerable to Soviet pressure to declare so openly. Moscow knows what is going on, of course, but for Pakistan to an- nounce it would be nothing more than a provocation. Why add insult to unsurge- cy? So all parties agree to a fiction. Fiction, a high farm of literature, -is considered, in this country at least; a. low form of diplomacy. Diplomacy being the means of.advan ing the interests-Qf ms's country by macs shat of war. it is hard to see why this should be so. I concede that truth is preferable. For one thing it is easier to memorize. On the other hand, it can be habit forming. What to do? Graham Gram had it right. "He always prderred the truth," he says of his hero in 'The Human Fac- tor." "Except on really important occ Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00552R000606120049-5