R.&D. DATA CURBS HURT MORE THAN RUSSIA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000100010005-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 2, 2010
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 5, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000100010005-4.pdf59.43 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000100010005-4 f p'p *- L ~~i S:wt`J. Vii F;_, G- . NEV YORK TIMES 5 FEBRUARY 1982 R.& D. Data Curbs Hurt More Than TotheEditor. percent -had been- maintained over In a speech totheAnnerican Associa. $100 billion more R.& D. would have Lion for the Advancement of Science; been performed in that period. A tor of the Central dm. Bobby R. Inman, Deputy Direc.? . Think of what the 3100 billion could asked for voluntary Age, have done to maintain vitality in the tmeasures to pre. industrial, and educational system. vent the loss of'sensitive rnilitarytech. Without it, we've experienced a r+ever- nology to the Soviet Union Otherwise. ' sal in our balance of trade, from posi. he said, the scientists will lace"legal tive to negative. Our engineering and restraints" (news story Jan. 8)c science schools have suffered (only 5.8 '.: There seams no= question that the percent of our 1980 college graduates ,.Soviets havee.benefited from western were.engineer ,compared with 35 per. technology, and particularly from U.S. cent in the U.S.S.R. -37 percent in West technology because of our long tradl. Gerata ryand7l t Japan). tion of open publication of unclassified research and development.- However, - size of the .P~~f, and therefore measures that prevent Soviet access to the ability of the nation to support des. unclassified literature also: prevent perately needed social hundreds, of ? thousands -.ofi engineers, diminished because it hasPrograms n 't been ?o r- scientists'.:and, undergaduate . and Lured by the new enterprises and the graduate students in the-U.S.. in allied : newproducts that come from R.& D. nations and in developing nations from.. ? Unfortunately, many Americans vingaooess to that same;naterial.. : fail to realize that the country's wealth It used to bq, that U.S. research and . was built on R.& D. Now It needs to development was so far ahead of the. rebuilt Arty new policy of restricting rest of the world that *e could only be the. flow. of unclassified , literature pleased : when our technology was should bey thought through But for al- fully lest it hurt not only very cars. propagated or the Soviets most 13 years, R:& D. as a percentage but all of gross national pnodaet: has been society ' J ~ J. HARFtut dropping--from 2.9 percent of G.N.P. ... ecutive fir' Amerfcan Instiitute in 1907 to about 2 of Aeronautics York. a rouauties percent now- If the2.9 98' New=-71 ;,1 Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/09/02 CIA-RDP90-00806R000100010005-4