MUSEUM NO SOLACE FOR SPOOKS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000200790009-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 22, 2010
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 17, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000200790009-4.pdf49.61 KB
Body: 
Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/22 : Cl PORTLAND EXPRESS (ME) 17 November 1983 MUSEUM T he Senate Select Intelli- gence Committee this month heard a proposal to es- tablish a National Historical In- telligence Museum. What a dumb idea. The hearing, of course, was public. So, too, would be the museum. And if that doesn't create any' problems, U.S. secret intelligence must be worse than we thought. As it is, the Central Intelli- gence Agency recently over- counted the Cubans in Grenada. -Critics suggest that human spies cruising seedy bars count better than satellites cruising high in the air. Maybe so. But human spies also know enough not to get caught dead in a museum. - What's left? Paraphernalia. The leading candidate is a wooden American eagle the Russians once bugged in the U.S. embassy in Moscow. The eagle made good television 20 years ago, co-starring with U.N. Ambassador Adlai Stevenson. But can it still draw the crowds? Nobody knows. The same goes for satellite No solace for spooks photographs. Paraphrasing Groucho Marx, does anyone want to see a spy picture the. CIA is willing to show them? Don't worry. Real spies won't stand still for the museum. For a time, former spy Edwin Wilson even refused to stand still long enough for the courts. We can - guess where he learned the technique. CIA Di- erector William J. Casey genially boosted the museum when he testified at .this month's hear- ing. The way he did it would -warm a double-agent's heart. First Casey "heartily endorsed" the museum, then he said some- one else would have to stock it: " l would not want to mislead anyone into expecting us (the CIA) to be a major source of ex- hibits ..." So much for that. The Depart- ment of Agriculture doesn't spy much, and the Navy's so tight with its secrets it still won't say what the Monitor found out about the Merrimack. No, the CIA is the store- house. If the spies won't come in from the cold, the museum's out in it, too. Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/22 : CIA-RDP90-00806R000200790009-4