BUDGET CUTS MAY FORCE UD TO DROP BAN

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00806R000201140060-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 30, 2010
Sequence Number: 
60
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 31, 1982
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00806R000201140060-7.pdf155.87 KB
Body: 
STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/30: CIA-RDP90-00806R000201140060-7 ARTICLE ON PACE By JANIN> JAQUET, h;;;':':':. Newark Burean'eporter BAN OIL secret government research at the' University of Delaware -An effect since the Vietnam War protests -- may end up a casualty of the Rea- gan bttgeiruut,, 1 -" Eve a Ending the bans ,:abe $ alternatives that unversity-:admin istrators are considering-to brace the school against expected cuts. In government-research funds for non-classified work:'~`'"*~.;~? The other alternatives; proposed by an eight-member committee appointed last spring to reconcil' the need for more inoriey with the ethical questions involved lit secret aaverninent.research, are: ? To ,create h legaIl~i'eparate, ,off-campus institute for, secret research. O To setup a panel of senior fac' , ulty members to review; proposed. .,.:University-P esiden dot'said'wheh;`he will present the. riiatter ( 4othe? university board of trustees:..~5?~b?{ r ; Trabant warned -the trustees ' at their. December meeting that an increased Defense Department -budget and an emphasis on building, military strength means that more. money will go to secret government= research titan to non-classified :ZIP il?; 1T(}3 ;~.5 JOii_f i.\L (D3) 31 January 1982 chairman of the study committee,J ' -you have'a more profound ques- is playing down the prospects of? tion," he said. "What is the relation- renewed classified- research at the ship of government to the academic university.: eo;nmumty? Those of us who came The decision to allow secret work` in university facilities may not be' made for several more years, Ship- man said., although officials. see.a trend in the direction of funding. The university's dilemma - and - the temptation it faces .can be: seen in the budgets of three federal agencies that dole out-billions of dollars to researchers every year. ';In1980, the National.Science Foundation and the National* Insti= -tutes'of Health distributed about $3 billion for academic.In 'fiscal: 1982, -Defense:.Depart- 'inent-spending for research has grown to almost '$20 billion.-:The budget of the National: Science: Foundation was cut. by almost $1 .million; and the-budget of 'the National Institutes of HeaItX- while increased about 2 percent; has less. spending power if inflation is-taken into account, according 'to . spokes- -men for the agencies.' work. .` a ~ Pentagon officials will notsay ver the next f e v+-` e a r s .? what portion of their budget will go. [sources of federaI`suppart, o for classified research - that research) will change, and- it 'will "information itself is classified 'have 'ah, effect',ont e:.;educational but Shipman said the prevailing rogrhrtis of bui';utiiversity,".Tra .opinion among university educa ~,,,,t tors is that-much of it will o d ba kin - .-.? ?. olaOr c g 111C real research by the National Science =- And the university, which will see' Foundation, willtdeclineimarkedl less money from the National Sci-_ ;over the text; few teat In some -ence Foundation-and-from the . universities;f there ;will. be fit sub , National -Insitututes of Health; stantial increase trr;riscarchsup- must decide whether to go after' port from the Department of p some of those defense funds. ' .. ,; .: Defense. The-question is, will this According to James Oliver, a " he said occur at our university . , :While Trabant apparently was political science professor and on the sinister side. This type of projects and .decide 'on their suit- ability. out. of grad school during the late. '60s and early 70s may not look at it the way our colleagues who came ?- out earlier do." Near the end of the Vietnam War. --'and for some years afterward - many universities shied away from.. 'government research that could be ':.used by the military. But in recent years, they have been more willing. -to accept contracts for.-defense- related research, while at the same- ;time looking for ways to avoid the . appearance of impropriety.".,. -One alternative proposed'by the: University of Delaware . committee is modeled after.the'approach taken by MIT .and -Johns Hopkins :University -- the creation'of an "arms-length;" off- campus-,research institute, to conduct gov-' Although'-the -concept-b only in .rough outline.:form; Shipman says: ' the comtittee.proposed?creating an institute' affiliated with the.Uni-:. versity of: Delaware'.with:facilities?~i available to faculty 'members and scientists from outside the school.?It -would be located. somewhere:"not =too far, but fairly remote," he,said, :adding that Hockessin had been mentioned as a possible site. i Shipman says the'raason for seek- irg an off campus site is to avoid -the effects that the facility -might -have -if it were .on campus. &I: ,wouldn't want to -see buildings on this campus with*'No Admittance' signs on them," be said. "It could have-a chilling effect on people." ? ` Committee-member_.Robert G..; Dean, a professor of civil engi-1 neering, said another alernative is the formation of a group of disin terested senior faculty members to pass judgment on', which projects will be accepted-and which will not. ...: "There-are different types of classified research," he said, "some priming the.ilniversity's trustees ?comrruttee member, there research should definitely not be for the change in policy. Henry L. at stake thaw simply deis cidinmoreg done; the question is who should e"{.aii.a~ iaw..aL raca??.wl.ehnnlri ~a Shipman,. a Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/07/30: CIA-RDP90-00806R000201140060-7ncD