SABOTAGING THE DISSIDENT PRESS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00845R000200970004-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 16, 2010
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 1, 1981
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00845R000200970004-6.pdf116.75 KB
Body: 
STAT Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/16: CIA-RDP90-00845R000200970004-6 0l PAGs .~ The untold story of the secret offensive waged by the U.S. government against antiwar publications by ANGUS MACKENZIE he American public has learned in the last few years a great deal about the government's surveillance of the left during the Vietnam War era. The re- port of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (the Church committee) first suggested how widely the government had been involved in planting informants inside New Left groups, propagating false information about these groups, and using a variety of tactics to disrupt their activities. That such tactics were also used on a vast scale against dissenting magazines and the underground press, however, has not been reported in a comprehensive way. -The story has lain scattered in a hundred places. " Now, documents obtained by editors and writers under the Freedom of Information Act, and interviews with former intelligence agents, make it pos- sible, for the first time, to put together a coherent - though not necessarily complete - account of the federal gov- ernment's systematic and sustained violation of the First Amendment during the late 1960s and early 1970s. The government's offensive against the underground press primarily in- volved three agencies - the CIA, the FBI, and the Army. In many cases, their ? Angus Mackenzie is a free-lance writer in northern California. Editorial assistance was provided by Jay Peter--ell of the Center for Notional Security Studies in Washin>;ton, which also provided research assistance. The article was financed in part by the Fund COLUMBIA JOURNALISM REVIEW March/April 1981 activities stemmed from what they could claim were legitimate concerns. The CIA's Operation CHAOS, for example, was set up to look into the foreign con- nections of domestic dissidents; how- ever, it soon exceeded its mandate and became part of the broad attack on the left and on publications that were re- garded as creating a climate disruptive of the war effort. At its height, the gov- ernment's offensive may have affected more than 150 of the roughly 500 un- derground publications that became the nerve centers of the antiwar and coun- tercultural movements. A telling example of this offensive was the harassment of Liberation News Service, which, when opposition to the Vietnam War was building, played a key role in keeping the disparate parts of the antiwar movement informed. By 1968, the FBI had assigned three infor- mants to penetrate the news service, while nine other informants regularly reported on it from the outside. Their reports were forwarded to the U.S. Ar- my's Counterintelligence Branch, where an analyst kept tabs on LNS founders Ray Mungo and Marshall Bloom, and to the Secret Service, the Internal Revenue Service, the Navy, the Air Force, and the CIA. The FBI also attempted to dis- credit and break up the news service through various counterintelligence ac- tivities, such as trying to make LNS ap-." pear to be an FBI front, to create friction among staff members, and to burn down the LNS office in Washington while the staff slept upstairs. Before long, the CIA, too, joined the offensive; one of its recruits began filing reports on the movements of LNS staff members while reporting for the underground press to establish his cover as an underground journalist. . The CIA was apparently the first fed- eral agency to plan actions against rectorate of Plans (its "dirty tricks" de- assigned to counterintelli- partment) gence agent Richard Ober the task of "pulling together information on Ru,n- parts, including any evidence of sub- version [and] devising proposals for counteraction." While those proposals remain secret, several details relating to the Ramparts operation have become known. n February 1, an associate of Ober's met -with Thomas Terry, assistant to the com- missioner of the Internal Reve- nue Service, to request that the IRS review Ramparts' corpo- rate tax returns to determine who the magazine's backers were. Terry agreed to do so. Subsequently, Ober's office provided the IRS with "detailed infor- mant information" about Ramparts backers, whom the IRS was requested to investigate for possible tax violations. Ober's investigation of the magazine uncovered no "evidence of subversion" or ties to foreign intelligence agencies. By August, however, it had produced a computerized listing of several hundred Americans, about fifty of whom were the subject of detailed files. domestic publications. Its Operation In August, too, Ober's mandate was CHAOS grew out of an investigation of expanded as the CIA. responding to Ramnarts marine which during the pressure from President Johnson. ini- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2010/06/16: CIA-RDP90-00845R000200970004-6