HOUSE ACTS TO ALLOW ANGOLA REBEL AID

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000302150004-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 27, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 11, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000302150004-0.pdf82.62 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/27 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000302150004-0 As NEW YORK TIMES 11 July 1985 House Acts to Allow Angola e sel Aid By JONATHAN FUERBRINGER Special to The New York Times WASHINGTON, July 10? The House of Representatives voted tonight to re- peal the ban. on United States military aid to the guerrillas fighting the Marx- ist Government of Angola. The vote was 236 to 185 on an amendment W the foreign aid authorization bill. The Senate has approved a similar repeal, which means it is likely that the ban, first approved in 1976, will be re- pealed this year. But the Senate repeal was attached to a different piece of legislation, the State Department au- thorization act, and it is possible that the entire foreign aid authorization bill will not be approved in the House. In the House vote, 176 Republicans were joined by 60 Democrats in favor of repeal; 179 Democrats and 6 Republi- cans opposed repeal. The vote, which is a major reversal, reflects a growing sentiment in the House for aiding groups that are fight- ing Communist and other leftist gov- ernments. On Tuesday, the House ap- proved $5 million in aid to the non-Com, munist rebels fighting the Vietnamese- controlled Government of Cambodia. The House has also approved aid to the insurgents in Afghanistan and nonmili- tary aid to Nicaraguan rebels. The amendment approved today was proposed by Representatives Samuel S. Stratton of New York and Claude Pepper of Florida, both Democrats. It only removes the ban it does not pro- vide any financing for military aid. Those supporting the amendment said it would show that the United States opposed Communism in Africa and, as Mr. Pepper said, had "not washed our hands of Angola. Those people in Africa have the right to be free." The Reagan Administration sup- ports repeal. Opponents argued that repealing the ban would indicate support for the apartheid policy of South Africa, against which the House has approved economic sanctions. In addition, they argued, it would imply support of the South African Government's military actions in South-West Africa and Ango- la. 'Majority Rule' Seen as Issue "The issue in southern Africa is not Communist expansion, it's majority rule," said Representative William H. Gray 3d, Democrat of Pennsylvania. He said repealing the ban, known as the Clark Amendment after former Sena- tor Dick Clark of Iowa, would "support tip continued suppression of the ma- jority there." The so-called Clark Amendment had banned aid to the pro-Western National Union for the Total Independence of Angola, which is led by Jonas Savimbi. The vote came as the House contin- ued work on the $12.6 billion foreign aid authorization bill. At the same time, the Senate began today to consider a bill imposing sanctions on the South Af- rican Government. It Was being blocked from moving to approval, how- ever, by opposition led by Senator Jesse Helms, Republican of North Carolina. Measures on Family Planning Earlier today, the House approved two amendments to the foreign aid bill that restrict funding for family plan- ning. One allows the cutoff of funds to international organizations if abortion is promoted by the family planning programs these organizations support. The second amendment, which is aimed at China, allows the cutoff of funding for the United Nations Fund for Populations Activities, if it provides di- rect or indirect assistance to countries that officially permit forced abortion. After the Senate voted to 8 to block a filibuster on the motion to begin de- bate on the South African bill, Senator Helms indicated that he might extend the debate by reading a history of South Africa. The bill would apply economic sanc- tions against South Africa, banning new bank loans, the sale of computers to agencies like the police that enforce the policy of apartheid, and the sale of goods used in nuclear production. The bill would also require Ameritan com- panies of 25 or more employees to fol- low the so-called Sullivan principles, which mandate equal treatment of blacks in jobs and housing. Senator Alan Cranston, Democrat of California, in denouncing Senator Helms's delaying tactics, said: "If the Senator from North Carolina had been in the Senate 122 years ago, he probably would have opposed Emanci- pation because it would have thrown four million slaves out of work." Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/27: CIA-RDP90-00965R000302150004-0