ARMS NEGOTIATORS PLAN NEW EFFORT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000302430008-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 21, 2012
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 1, 1987
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000302430008-5.pdf64.29 KB
Body: 
STA' Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/21 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000302430008-5 r rja O.N ? . PAGE'w NEW YORK TIMES 1 February 1987 61 ARMS NEGOTIATORS PLAN NEV EFFORT Will Discuss What 'Star Wars' Research and Testing Is Allowed by ABM Pact By MICHAEL R. GORDON Special to The New York Time WASHINGTON, Jan. 31 ? American and Soviet negotiators have agreed in Geneva to set up a special working group to discuss what research, devel- opment and testing are allowed for de- !II naive systems by the 1972 Anti-. ballistic Missile Treaty, Administra- tion officials say. The move by the negotiators has been vigorously opposed by the De- fense Department, which has argued that the United States should not take part in such a group. Richard N. Perle, an Assistant Secre- tary of Defense, assailed the move to set up the working group in a high-level meeting on Thursday, officials said. The session was attended by Max M. Kampelman, the chief American nego- tiator, who has returned from Geneva. In a related development, Yevgeny P. Velikhov, a vice president of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, met with Paul H. Nitze, an adviser on arms con- trol issues to Secretary of State George P. Shultz. Soviet and American offi- cials said they had discussed the ques- tion- Of setting up discussions on what kind of space weapons and space tests are banned by the ABM treaty. Differences of Interpretation The United States and the Soviet Union have strong differences over how to interpret the ABM treaty. Although Soviet officials have pro- posed a strict interpretation of the agreement, the Reagan Administration has said it has the right to adopt a loose interpretation that would allow exten- sive testing of new types of space. based systems such as the Strategic Defense Initiative, commonly known as "Star Wars." Some Administration officials say they believe that the differences be- tween the two sides on this question will ultimately have to be bridged if an arms agreement in Geneva is to be reached. But other Administration officials say the United States should not com- promise on this issue. They complain that the establishment of a working group could promote the negotiation of measures that would interfere with the extensive testing of space-based defen- sive systems. The dispute over procedures in the Geneva talks takes place amid impor- tant developments concerning the ABM treaty and defensive systems. FQT Instance. Government experts .1111_11,sessing41th2encumagm3 thAt I the Soviet Union may be dismantling part _ of its disputed early warning radar at Krasnoyarsk in Central Me- rig . Air Force intelligence officers have reportedly said there are SUMS that the 'Russians may be removing some an- tennas from the radar and electronic equipment from within the radar build- ing. But other officials said the intelli- gence on this was not vet clear. The United States says the radar violates the ABM treaty and has asked the Soviet Union to dismantle it. ? Administration officials said Friday that the White House had scheduled a meeting for Tuesday of its National Se- curity Planning Group. Such meetings are headed by President Reagan and are attended by Cabinet members and senior officials from throughout the Goyernment. , Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/09/21 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000302430008-5