EX-AGENT FACES COURT ORDER IN LIBEL SUIT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000403640008-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 9, 2012
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 18, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000403640008-0.pdf74.61 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/03/09: CIA-RDP90-00965R000403640008-0 4 C`.1? 22' Ex-Agent Faces Court Order in Libel Suit - A federal judge has issued an order in the $120 million libel suit brought by a former CIA agent against publisher Lawrence Hill that could discourage similar suits against those who write and publish books critical of the intelli- gence establishment. The book in question is Death in Washington. Former agent David Atlee Phillips brought two libel suits, since consolidated, in 1981 against the West- port, Conn., publisher and the authors,' Donald Freed and Fred Landis. Death in Washington charges that Phillips orchestrated a coverup of the fact that Chilean diplomat Orlando Le- telier, who was killed by a bomb explo- sion in his car in Washington, D.C., in 1976, was assassinated by agents of the ruling junta in Chile that the CIA had helped to install and that Phillips worked to obstruct the FBI and police investigations of the assassination. During the interrogatory period of the four-year-old suit, according to Melvin_W.ulf of -the New York firm-o--.. Beldock Levine & Hoflman,:l2 er.?or= the authors,--160 critical questions" designed to establish relevant facts about the case were submitted to Phil- lips. Because Phillips had signed an agreement on joining the CIA not to re- veal classified information, he refused to reply to the interrogatories, claiming the privilege against self-incrimination since violating his secrecy oath would be a crime. , In addition, Wulf said, attorneys for the U. S. government were present dur- ing the taking of depositions and they sgtrc1i