EVEN HARDBALL HAS RULES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000504160035-1
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 9, 2012
Sequence Number: 
35
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 24, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000504160035-1.pdf59.53 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/09: CIA-RDP90-00965R000504160035-1 Ah'T;C E AP N-W YORK TIMES 0-'4 PAGE PLARM 24 November 1986 The Editorial Notebook Even Hardball Has Rules American views about espionage have changed considerably since that age of innocence when a code-break- ing unit was shut down in 1929 by Sec- retary of State Stimson because "Gentlemen do not read each other's mail." In the age of cold war, most people acknowledge the need to play hardball. Small countries may have the luxury of virtue; great powers are locked in a clandestine combat in which no mercy is expected. But what if the great power is a democracy and what if it plays hard- ball by giving an execution list of Soviet agents to a hostile tyranny like Iran? That's what the C.I.A. is supposed to have done, according to unnamed officials in a Washington Post ac- count. The agency reportedly pro- vided Ayatollah Khomeini in 1982 with a list of as many as 200 names of Soviet agents, most of whom were swiftly executed. If it happened, the ostensible purpose was to curry favor with Iran and to cripple K.G.B. opera- tions in a vital country. For the sake of the C.I.A. and America's honor, one hopes this terrible transaction never took piare. Iran's Police Need No Help From The C.I.A. . All dossiers are fallible. In Viet- nam, Americans found to their dis- may that Operation Phoenix, a secret program of "neutralizing" spies, claimed innumerable innocents. As one officer recalled: "I found exam- ples in my own nets of Vietnamese re- porting people to whom they owed money qc longstanding family fights or had 'personal arguments." It's hard to believe that American agents have any surer knowledge of Iran, or are better placed to evaluate what a Soviet detector might say. In Iran, mere suspicion can be fatal, with "proof" extracted under torture. If the C.I.A. gratuitously fur- nished a list of spies to Khomeini's brutal police, the K.G.B. could well compete in this deadly game by pur- porting to unmask Western agents. At the crudest level, this blood trade wins no favor since Iran knows that the C.I.A. is also covertly helping exiled Iranians. In the end, that kind of hardball only confirms Teheran's belief in the Great Satan's perfidy. Bitter experience has persuaded Americans that espionage needs rules and limits. The Church Commit- tee exposed botched attempts to kill foreign leaders like Fidel Castro and to destabilize unfriendly regimes. Then came disturbing revelations about past recruitment of Nazi war criminals like Klaus Barbie as. anti- Communist intelligence "assets." Bit by bit, another dreadful story has been emerging: The cynical Western betrayal in 1945 of perhaps a million Russian exiles and war prisoners, in- discriminately returned to certain death in the Soviet Union. There's no colder phrase in diplo- macy than "raison-d'6tat," the justi- fication that enables decent people to do the indecent for flag and country. But enly extreme circumstance can excuse a democracy's secret-conniv- ance with evil to combat evil. Turning over names of alleged traitors to Iran is the kind of hardball that Americans ought not play, and cannot win. KARL E.. MEYER JT Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/09: CIA-RDP90-00965R000504160035-1