BOOKS OF THE TIMES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000504490011-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 23, 2012
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 13, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000504490011-1.pdf112.2 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/23: CIA-RDP90-00965R000504490011-1 A'ryrR, I'M Uis 2 Al YORK TINTS 13 June 1985 Books of The Times By Charles Mohr SECRECY AND DEMOCRACY: The CIA two employees clearly involved in an in Transition. By Stanfield Turner. 304 improper association-with a renegade pages. Houghton Mifflin. $16.95 retiree named Edwin P. Wilson, who is now serving more than 50 years in ORE than one Congress- man has described the gence but failures in interpretation and analysis of the data gathered. Of the political tremors that toppled the Shah of Iran in 1978, hi- notes that "most of the evidence about what was going to happen was available right on the surface" and that traditional Central Intelligence tors and six other people. espionage methods have not been use- Agency as a "rogue ele- This book is not rich in cloak-and- ful in forecasting long-range political phant." The institution that Adm. dagger anecdote (possibly in part be- trends. Stansfield Turner found when he was cause of more than 100 C.I.A. dele- He also pushed for traditional "ob- appointed Director of Central Intelli- tions that the author calls arbitrary jectivity" in intelligence, arguing gence in 1977 more nearly resembled for "ridiculous"). But it is a valuable that it must provide real analysis, not a somewhat geriatric Missouri mule. primer for a large majority of the "ammunition" for policy makers Although "the agency" has always ,public in the actual art of intelligence determined on a fixed policy. . contained perhaps the most impres- land, even more important, in basic It is somewhat poignant to consider sive concentration of intellectual tal- principles and problems of reconcil- how emphemeral his subtitle describ- ent in the Federal Government and ling what has often been called a ing an institution in "transition" to a has done perhaps the best, most hon- "'dirty, back alley war" with constitu- new generation of pros proved to be. est thinking in many diverse fields, it tional government and American Admiral Turner was replaced by an has been a bit like the late Mayor La political pluralism. The book is wiser O.S.S. veteran and covert action en- Guardia in that its mistakes tended to than it is entertaining. thusiast, William Casey, who has re- be "lulus." Unlike a school of troglodyte cheer- sisted Congressional oversight and But Admiral Turner found a C.I.A. leaders anxious to "unleash" espio- has acted as a policy advocate. He is in which 30 percent of officers in the nage and covert action operators, Ad- a man who in one speech described dominant espionage branch were 50 miral Turner, firstly, recognized that the well-documented abuses of the or more years old, crowding the agen- the task of subjecting the C.I.A. to. past as "mostly false." The admiral cy's early retirement age. The lead- Congressional control was not impos- says it is Mr. Casey's remark that is ership cadre had been recruited from sible. He argues convincingly that false and dangerous. the World War II Office of Strategic years of unsupervised freedom re- Services or in the early 1950's and was quired that, agency officials always near the end of its service. demonstrate perfect judgment on the He found that "the covert action feasibility as well as the politcal ac- cupboard was almost bare." Al- ceptability of their plans - some- though Congress was clamoring for thing which, of course, they could no, greater powers of oversight, the achieve. The relatively mild over- C.I.A. itself had gone into a state of sight imposed by the Congressional shock when abuses of 20 years of un- select committees on intelligence not supervised actions had come to public only created accountability but light, and' it had become so cautious spread it more widely, permitting, in that it had nearly handcuffed itself. fact, greater freedom of action. ? He also found a "tweedy," if intel- impressive, analysis branch lectually that had little prestige, tended to work on old, familiar problems and had little "marketing" ability to make its output appetizing to policy makers. On the positive side, he found a relatively new and vastly impressive capability to gather "technical intel- ligence" of astonishing accuracy and detail through satellites and sensors. But, even: here, many in the espio- nage branch were suspicious of this prison sentences for conspiring to smuggle weapons to Libya and to Admiral Turner also takes an unro- mantic, . but sound view of covert operations (supposedly deniable propaganda, political or military operations abroad). Of his politically macho, but administratively untem- pered colleague, National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, he says that the White House adviser "held unrealistic expectations of what could be achieved by covert action." Like more orthodox military operations, spooky high jinks must match goals with capabilities; it is fatal to confuse the allure of a goal with the means or asset a When President Carter asked to see lack of means to reach it - a point "overhead" photography of a minor worth pondering in the current furor war in the Third World, it took a balky over the Contra operation against bureaucracy weeks to comply, and Nicaragua. Unlike some idealists, the Admiral Turner notes with exaspera- admiral sees a role for covert opera- tion that, while he was nominally the tions but advocates a few shots well- chief of debatably the best intelli- placed on reachable targets. gence machine in the world, he could Admiral Turner also makes the not get pictures of a "Mickey Mouse overwhelmingly important, but often war." Even more serious, he found overlooked point that most of the real that he had little influence on person- "intelligence failures" in recent nel decisions; that "nut one" senior United States history have not been officer agreed with his decision to fire failures in the collection of intelli- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/23: CIA-RDP90-00965R000504490011-1