ATTACK ON SALT-2 IS NO LAUGHING MATTER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000504730020-4
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 8, 2012
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 4, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000504730020-4.pdf76.28 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/08: CIA-RDP90-00965R000504730020-4 YORK DAILY NEWS 4 June 1986 Attack on SALT-2 is no laughing matter By LARD--ERIK NELSON W ASHINGTON-From one White House official came a startled giggle. From an in- telligence official, there was a serious "Hmmm, that's a good question." From the Arms Control Agency, the answer, after a day of thought, was "Nobody knows the answer to that." The question that produced this dis- play of mumbles and grins: "Now that President Reagan has thrown out the SALT-2 treaty, what are we going to do if the Russians start concealing their nuclear missile deployments, covering up submarines, spoofing our satellites, hiding data from their missile tests?" The Reagan administration re- sponse: Giggles, "Hmmms" and an un- easy shuffling of feet. A more serious response from a career State Department official: "If the Russians cheat in the future, we won't have any basis for complaint. There is no standard any longer." Adds a Senate expert: "If they start to con- ceal their tests, we won't have any right to call them on it." In the past, if the Russians covered up a nuclear missile silo or encrypted data from a missile test, the United States could challenge them at the Standing Consultative Commission. That forum wasn't perfect, but it did clear up some U.S. misgivings about possible Soviet cheating. No longer will the Russians be obliged to answer any questions about their strategic nuclear force. By junk- ing SALT-2, Reagan has taken them off they hook. looked in its lust to slay the "fatally " flawed treaty, is that SALT-2 was two treaties-a U.S.-Soviet intelligence agreement, and a cap on nuclear weapons. As an intelligence treaty, SALT-2 maintain an "oven skies" policy for Sophisticated U.S. satellites It forced the 5ovlet military to less secretive .1nan it prefers Article 15 said, "Each party under. takes not to use deliberate concealment measures which impede verifica- tion ..* of compliance with the provi. sions of this treaty." The ban on concealment apolled fo e - - as IA rner sai in C a asymmetry in need" -i.e we ne ert ?soteMate?.'a srtd eni inr,,,at n,~ ore: W. Sdv= Not any more. Where once we used to complain that the Russians en- crypted some of the telemetry (radio data) from their missile tests, now they are free to encrypt all of it. "We've thrown out the baby with the bathwa. ter," says former National Security Council expert Roger Molander. Reagan's SALT-2 decision has been a triple play: It has antagonized the Euro- pean allies, it has given the Russians freedom to return, if they choose, to a nuclear build-up in total secrecy-and it has united Democrats on an arms- control policy. The first challenge to Reagan's deci- sion will come next month-not from the Russians, but from House Demo- crats preparing legislation to bar him from spending any money to violate the limits on SALT-2. Under the plan, engineered by Rep.. Les AuCoin (D-Ore.), Reagan would have to abide by SALT-2 ceilings as long as the Russians do. It is a strategy that short-circuits the Constitution-but it has worked before: Last December, AuCoin used the power of the purse to force the administration not to test antisatellite weapons as long as the Russians don't. N EXT MONTH, House Democrats will submit a bill to force Reagan to dismantle Minuteman missiles if he proceeds with his plan to arm more B-52 bombers with cruise missiles. Normally, such extra-Constitu- tional diplomacy wouldn't have a prayer. But the Democrats are conclud- ing, in the words of one staffer, that Reagan's tough-sounding policies "real- ly don't protect this country's national security." Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/08: CIA-RDP90-00965R000504730020-4