MISSING THE IRAN ARMS STORY: DID THE PRESS FAIL?

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP90-00965R000707060015-9
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: December 22, 2016
• Document Release Date: February 10, 2012
• Sequence Number: 15
• Publication Date: March 4, 1987
• Content Type: OPEN SOURCE

Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/10: CIA-RDP90-00965R000707060015-9
NL,?1 YORK T I ML S
ON PAGE 4 March 1981 -A] 1
Missing the Iran Arms Story:
Did the Press Fail?
Bar ROBER^ TAR
Special to The New York Ttmee
WASHINGTON, March 3 - It i
clear that dozens of people - officials
private arms dealers, usinessmen
an inanciers in srae an other coun-
tries - knew ear on a ut a e-
live o American arms to Iran that
be an in u
Simi arly, a network of pilots and re-
tired military officers knew that the
"covert" American efforts to aid the
rebels fighting the Marxist Govern-
ment of Nicaragua were far more ex-
tensive than the White House acknowl-
edged. in on
But, even with all these people wn on
the Iran-Nicaragua story shake the Reagan Presidthat ency, the
American press was not.
With just a few exceptions, little no-
ticed, the seeds of the scandal did not
take root on the nation's front pages
and news broadcasts until after a
Lebanese magazine, Al Shiraa, re-
ported Nov. 3 that America had been
supplying arms to the Teheran regime.
And it was another three weeks be-
fore the press relayed the news, dis-
closed by Attorney General Edwin
Meese 3d on Nov. 25, that some of the
profits from the arms sales had been
diverted to the Nicaraguan rebels in an'
operation supervised by Lieut. Col. Oli-
ver L. North, a member of the staff of
the National Security Council.
'The Press Failed'
"The press was lax in this case,"
Th
e
said Michael G. G GCL_edttor of
courier-iou in ouisville, Ky., who
resident of the American Society of
p
is
Newspaper Editors. '-The press failed,
- _.. I; ... ?w
to. this enormous scandal. Part of this
scandal must be laid at the doorstep of
the press."
Jack Nelson, Washington bureau
chief of The Los Angeles Times, said he
did not fully understand how the White
House had been able to keep the Iran
affair "secret for so long, inasumuch
as so many people knew about it."
How did it happen?
"There was an elaborate effort to
keep the operation secret from the
press, the Congress and various people
in the Administration," said
. ' ward, who played a key role in uncov-
EriRafhe Watergate scandal and is now
an assistant managing editor of The
Washington Post.
Journalists "who work in Washing-
ton and cover institutions couldn't get
the story," he said. But, he added,
pieces of it might have been obtained
from people outside Washington -
various middlemen, pilots, bankers,
perhaps even some of the "bellhops in
the Teheran Hilton."
Officials Deceived Officials
Access to information about the cov-
ert activities was extremely restricted
within the established bureaucracy, a
normal source of information for jour-
nalists in Washington. Government of-
ficials deceived one another, as well as
the public.
A Presidential review board's report
last week disclosed that in May, for in-
stance, Vice Adm. John M. Poindexter,
who was President Reagan's national
security adviser at the time, instructed
Colonel North not to talk to William J.
Casey, then the Director of Central In-
telligence, or anybody else about his
"operational roles." In June, Admiral
Poindexter said that Secretary of State
George P. Shultz "knows nothing about
the prior financing" of the contras and
added, "It should stay that way."
In addition, journalists note, Admin-
istration officials did not tell Congress
about the covert activities, precluding
any disclosure by lawmakers or their
aides. Last August, after Colonel North
misled, a Congressional committee in-
vestigating his work with the contras,
Admiral Poindexter commended him,
saying, "Well done," according to the
board headed by former Senator John
G. Tower.
Admiral Poindexter, who supervised
American policy toward Iran and the
Niacaraguan counterrevolutionaries,
had expressed disdain for the press. He
was not inclined to disclose details of
the covert operations.
And It Was Hard to Imagine
Also, journalists say, President Rea-
San's Iran initiative was protected
from disclosure because it was so im-
probable that few journalists would
have suspected it. "This operation was
oste u
tier
security corres ol1 a Wall
Street Journal, said in an interview.
Debates among Government offi-
cials are often a source of information
for journalists. But Herbert E. Hetu, a
spokesman for the Tower commission,
said that President Reagan's staff had'
permitted little debate on the decisinn
to sell arms to Iran.
"There just wasn't any debate going
on," he said. "No winners. No losers.
ndi
ated
e
H
..
e. ....,y
ow
,.. Jack Aq?gr~ptt and Dale Vag Alt I
roe ast June that the United toes i
was "kowtowing to Khomeini," offer-
ing arms in exchange for hostages. In
later columns, they reported details of
the United States' "conciliatory tilt to-
ward Iran."
Mr. Van Atta said he received calls
from many reporters trying to follow
up on the columns. But the reporters
generally failed because they could not
obtain confirmation from the State De-
partment or intelligence agencies.
press Was Easy on Reagan
The columnist said Government offi-
cials discouraged him from writing
about the negotiations with Iran last
year, on the ground that any publicity
might endanger the hostages' lives.
"Reagan was popular and the press
was not," Mr. Van Atta said. "At that
time, the President would probably
have won any dispute with the press on
national security issues."
Even when the first hints of the arms
shipments began to emerge, American
journalists were slow to pick up the
story.
Robert C. McFarlane, the former na-
tional security adviser, visited Iran in
an effort to secure the release of Amer-
ican hostages in May 1986. An article
about his mission was carried in late
October in a small Lebanese newspa-
per connected to the pro-Iranian group
Hezbollah, the Party of God, according
to the'Tower commission.
"The article was based on a series of
leaflets distributed in Teheran" on Oct.
15 or 16, it said.
John P. Wallach, the foreign affairs
editor of the Hearst newspapers, and "
Nathan a senior editor of
e ers igest, are among the few
journalists who reported pieces of the
story before it became widely known.
In July 1985, Mr. Wallach reported
that the United St ran had ex-
changed messages expressing a desire
to improve relations. On Nov. 3 last
year, he reported that the United
States had been conducting "secret ne-
gotiations with Iran" for 16 months.
In Reader's Digest last August, Mr.
Adams wrote, "Israel is one of Iran's
most reliable sources for both arms
and munitions, despite denials by the
Israeli Government."
The New York Times reported on
Aug. 8, 1985, that the contras were re
ceiving "direct military advice from
White House officials" on the staff of
the National Security Council. The
name of Colonel North was withheld at
the request of the White House, which
said that publishing the name would
endanger his life.
Other news organizations and mem-
bers of Congress also investigated
Colonel North's activities and identi-
fied him by name.
"We knew North was a mystery fig-
ure," said Mr. Nelson of The Los An-
"
We wro te stories about
geles Times.
him. But we did not delve deep enough.
We should have."
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/10: CIA-RDP90-00965R000707060015-9