NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

AN AMERICAN DILEMMA

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90-00965R000807400009-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 9, 2012
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 13, 1985
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90-00965R000807400009-7.pdf85.57 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/03/12 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000807400009-7 ARTICLE APP NEW YORK TIMES ON PAGE - 13 December 1985 IN THE NATION I Tom Wicker An American Dilemma G eorge Shultz told a London audience the other day that Western nations should use whatever means necessary, including covert military aid, to support anti- Communist forces in such places as Angola, Afghanistan, Cambodia and Nicaragua. But conspicuously miss- ing from the Secretary of State's list was the Philippines. Owing to important military bases there, vital U.S. interests are more certainly at stake in the Philippines than any of the other places Mr. Shultz mentioned. It was only four years ago, moreover, that Vice Presi- dent George Bush journeyed to the Philippines to offer in an effusive inaugural toast the Reagan Adminis- tration's commitment to President Ferdinand Marcos. We love your adherence to demo- cratic principles and to the demo- cratic process," Mr. Bush gushed. But no one doubts that Mr. Mar- cos's "pro-American" Government is now under severe challenge from ? a Communist insurgency - so much so that President Reagan recently dis- patched his close friend, Senator Paul Laxalt, to Manila to warn Mr. Marcos that he was losing the battle, mili- tarily and politically. So why wasn't the Philippines on Mr. Shultz's list? Because, it's reasonable to specu- late, the Communist insurgency is not the only or even necessarily the most immediate of Mr. Marcos's prob- lems; and because it can't be clear, even to the Reagan Administration, that backing him to the hilt is neces- sarily the best bet to stop a Commu- nist takeover. Accumulating charges of repres- sion and corruption, and the assassi- nation of a major political rival, Benign Aquino, have shaken Mr. Marcos's hold on power and his stand- ing among non-Communist Filipinos; now Gen. Fabian Ver and other mili- tary men whose responsibility for the killing had been strongly suggested by an investigating commission have been cleared by one of Mr. Marcos's courts, prompting complaint even from Washington. Mr. Marcos has been forced to call a special election for Feb. 7 - al- though it's by no means sure that he aims to go through with it or to abide by the results, if unfavorable to him. He'll be opposed by Corazon Aquino, Benigno's widow, a powerful emo- tional symbol to anti-Marcos Fili- pinos, and her running mate, Salva- dor Laurel, the leader of a well-organ- ized opposition party - a strong ticket in a clean election, democrati- cally oriented and pro-U.S. Here is a genuine American dilem- ma. Military men generally consider the U.S. bases in the Philippines highly important; and although it's not clear to what extent, if any, the self-labeled Communist insurgents are linked to Moscow, preservation of the bases un- doubtedly requires preservation of a pro-U.S. government. If Mrs. Aquino could win, that might bring new life to a democratic tradition most Americans would like to think their earlier stewardship ef- fectively planted in the Philippines; and even conservatives might agree that that would offer more hope of ef- fective resistance to the Communist insurgency than a continuation of Mr. Marcos's repressive, corrupt regime. U.S. military and other aid almost surely would be more generously proffered by a Congress long suspi- cious of the Marcos Government's Why isn't the Philippines on Shultz's list of forces fighting Reds? will and ability to clean itself up and put down the rebellion. On the other hand, the corrupt, strong-arm Marcos regime, long the recipient of undeviating U.S. support, might survive the February election by fair means or foul, only to crumble under the Communists' growing strength. Even if it didn't, Mr. Mar- cos hardly offers Filipinos the kind of democratic future Mr. Shultz extolled for Angolans, Afghans, Nicaraguans, etc. On the other hand, any suggestion of U.S. support for Mrs. Aquino cer- tainly would be denounced by the agile and vitriolic Mr. Marcos as unacceptable Yankee intervention in Philippine affairs; and might even give him an excuse to call off the elec- tion and return the nation to martial law. What effect any of that might have on the military bases is hard to estimate. Mr. Shultz's case for intervention- ism is by no means proved; whether, for instance, "covert" aid for the An- golan rebels improves or worsens the American position in southern Africa remains to be seen. And the complex case of the Philippines suggests again that mere anti-Communism is not al- ways a sufficient base for intelligent policy. ^ Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/03/12 : CIA-RDP90-00965R000807400009-7