NSSD-2/82

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90B01013R000300400045-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 20, 2008
Sequence Number: 
45
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 10, 1982
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90B01013R000300400045-2.pdf234.61 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/05/20: CIA-RDP90BO1013R000300400045-2 EXECUTE: SECRETARIA IVICS- 9 ,10 D/OEA-:- Approved For Release 2008/05/20: CIA-RDP90BO1013R000300400045-2 Approved For Release 2008/05/20: CIA-RDP90B01013R000300400045.2 _e:utivs Registry 10 June 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: INSSD-2/82 Study Director FROM: Director of Central Intelligence SUBJECT: NSSD-2/82 This will take a lot of picking to put together. The defense is very comprehensive and very well organized but not very specific. I found the FBI quite good. I have indicated to you some questions I raised. The CIA one-'is rather spotty and the point very weak, for example, the treatment of defense against active measures. It seems to me the CIA responses are the most meager compared to the range of threat with which it has to deal. One critical task which, it seems to me, will need to be-addressed is a discussion of the relative significance of the various threats, i.e., espionage/SIGINT, imagery/security, etc., and the relative effectiveness and cost of the various countermeasures. Everything can't be considered: Certainly everything can't be done at once. Therefore, the things that are most critical that can be addressed the most quickly and that will counter the critical threats most effectively need to be defined and tackled first. I haven't read the State paper. I will get around to that sometime. William "Casey Approved For Release 2008/05/20: CIA-RDP90BOl013R000300400045-2