LETTER TO WILLIAM J. CASEY FROM JACK BROOKS
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
K
Document Page Count:
4
Document Creation Date:
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date:
December 21, 2010
Sequence Number:
21
Case Number:
Publication Date:
June 26, 1986
Content Type:
LETTER
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 288.66 KB |
Body:
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
WIORRY MEMBERS
JACK BMDOKS, TEXAS. CHAIRMAN
DON FUQUA, FLORIDA
JOHN CONYERS. JR., MICHIGAN
CARDISS COLLINS, ILLINOIS
GLENN ENGLISH, OKLAHOMA
HENRY A. WAXMAN. CALIFORNIA
TED WEISS. NEW YORK
MIKE SYNAR, OKLAHOMA
STEPHEN L NEAL. NORTH CAROLINA
DOUG BARNARD. JR., GEORGIA
BARNEY FRANK. MASSACHUSETTS
TOM LANTOS, CALIFORNIA
ROBERT E. WISE. JR., WEST VIRGINIA
BARBARA BOXER, CALIFORNIA
SANDER M. LEVIN, MICHIGAN
MAJOR R. OWENS. NEW YORK
EDOLPHUS TOWNS, NEW YORK
JOHN M. $PRATT, JR., SOUTH CAROLINA
JOE KOLTER, PENNSYLVANIA
BEN ERDREICH. ALABAMA
GERALD 0. KLECZKA. WISCONSIN
ALBERT 0. BUSTAMANTE, TEXAS
MATTHEW G. MARTINS=, CALIFORNIA
st"xir ~ tL4 Recora
Congress of the United states
tout of 1 zprtientatI s
COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515
June 26, 1986
MWONiY 1101111011111112
FRANK HORTON. NEW YORK
THOMAS N. KINDNESS, OHIO
ROBERT S. WALKER, PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM F. CONGER, JR., PENNSYLVANIA
ALFRED A. (ALI MeCANDLESS. CALIFORNIA
LARRY E. CRAIG. IDAHO
HOWARD C. NIELSON, UTAH
JIM SAXTON, NEW JERSEY
PATRICK L SWINDALL, GEORGIA
THOMAS D. (TOM) DELAY, TEXAS
JOSEPH J. DIOGUARDI, NEW YORK
RICHARD K. ARMEY. TEXAS
JIM LIGHTFOOT, IOWA
JOHN R. MILLER, WASHINGTON
BEAU BOULTER. TEXAS
JOHN E. GROTBERG, ILLINOIS
MAJORITY-225-BOB 11
MINORITY-225-5074
Executive Re ist
86- Z21 ZA
The Honorable William J. Casey
Director
Central Intelligence Agency
Washington, D.C. 20505
Dear Mr. Casey:
The Committee on Government Operations has a continuing interest in
the Implementation of the law commonly known as Gramm-Rudman-Hollings
because it falls within the Committee's legislative as well as oversight
jurisdiction. Thus far the Committee has held three hearings on various
aspects of Gramm-Rudman-Hollings. The Committee is presently reviewing the
impact this law has had on the various departments and agencies in Fiscal
Year 1986 as well as what its impact is likely to be in Fiscal Year 1987.
Enclosed is a questionnaire containing five questions on these topics to
which the Committee would like your response by Friday, July 11, 1986.
When you return the questionnaire, please include the name and phone number
of the person who should be contacted in case anything needs clarification.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
QUESTIONNAIRE ON GRAMM-RUDMAN-HOLLINGS IMPACT
1. Please provide a list of all the budget accounts (include
title and account number) for which you are responsible and
identify the dollar amount and percentage of reduction that
occurred for each as a result of the February/March 1986
sequestration.
2. Please identify any of the budget accounts listed above that
were subsequently provided with additional funding as a result of
reprogramming, transfers, supplemental appropriations, or other
actions. Provide the dollar amount of the additional funding.
3. Please specify which of the following actions you found it
necessary to take to accommodate any reductions in funding
resulting from the sequestration. Answer sub-questions "a"
through "i" for your overall department/agency. Answer sub-
questions "j" through "1" for each of your principal sub-
department/agency components. Answer pertinent questions in
terms of the actual number of people involved rather than FTE's.
Attach additional sheets of paper wherever you find it necessary
to provide and/or explain all the information requested.
Department/agency
a) delay procurements:
I) noncapital acquisitions: # delayed
total $ amount
II) capital acquisitions: # delayed
total $ amount
b) restrict travel: total $ amount
% of total travel budget
c) restrict training: total $ amount
% of total training budget
d) freeze hiring: duration in months
if not affecting whole agency, specify the
components affected
resultant reduction in workforce
because of attrition:
# & % of permanent employees
reduced
# & % of temporary employees
reduced
# & % of other employees
reduced
e) furlough: # of days
# of people affected
% of workforce involved
f) rif: # of people affected
% of workforce involved
g) retire early: # of people affected
% of workforce involved
h) delay maintenance and repairs: # of projects
total $ amount
i) close field locations
(specify where) :
j) reduce service to the public (specify component and
program and give amount and percent of reduction in
each): '
I) inspections: amt. & % reduced
II) audits: amt. & % reduced
III) technical assistance: amt. & % reduced
IV) other (specify) amt. & % reduced
k) reduce benefits available to the public (specify component
and program and give amount and percent of reduction
in each):
I) grants: amt. & % reduced
II) loans: amt. & % reduced
III) other (specify) amt. & % reduced
1) raise user fees (specify component, program, and amount
of increase in each):
m) other (provide details):
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
4. Assuming a government-wide sequester in Fiscal Year 1987 of
$20 billion which could reduce your funding by about 7.3 percent
below Fiscal Year 1986 funding -levels after adjustment for Gramm-
Rudman-Hollings sequestration and subsequent supplementals, how
would the operations of your department/agency be affected?
Please specify the estimated dollar amount of the
department/agency-wide reduction which you would experience. In
addition, please specify which of the following actions you would
find it necessary to take under such conditions. 'Answer sub-
questions "a" through "i" for,your overall department/agency.
Answer sub-questions "j" through "1" for each of your principal
sub-department/agency components. Answer pertinent questions in
terms of the actual number of people involved rather than FTE's.
Attach additional sheets of paper wherever you find it necessary
to provide and/or explain all the information requested.
Department/agency
Estimated amount of reduction
a) delay procurements:
I) noncapital acquisitions: # delayed
total $ amount
II) capital acquisitions: delayed
total $ amount
b) restrict travel: total $ amount
% of total travel budget
c) restrict training: total $ amount
% of total training budget
d) freeze hiring: duration in months
if not affecting whole agency, specify the
components affected
resultant reduction in workforce
because of attrition:
# & % of permanent employees
reduced
# & % of temporary employees
reduced
# & % of other employees
reduced
e) furlough: # of days
# of people affected
% of workforce involved
f) rif: # of people affected
% of workforce involved
g) retire early: # of people affected
% of workforce involved
h) delay maintenance and repairs: # of projects
total $ amount
i) close field locations
(specify where) :
j) reduce service to the public (specify component and
program and give amount and percent of reduction in
each):
I) inspections: amt. & % reduced
II) audits: amt. & % reduced
III) technical assistance: amt. & % reduced
IV) other (specify) amt. & % reduced
k) reduce benefits available to the public (specify component
and program and give amount and percent of reduction
in each):
I) grants: amt. & % reduced
II) loans: amt. & % reduced
III) other (specify) amt. & % reduced
1) raise user fees (specify component, program, and amount
of increase in each):
m) other (provide details):
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8
5. Assuming a government-wide sequester in Fiscal Year 1987 of
$30 billion which could reduce your funding by about 11.8 percent
below Fiscal Year 1986 funding levels after adjustment for Gramm-
Rudman-Hollings sequestration and subsequent supplementals, how
would the operations of your department/agency be affected?
Please specify the estimated dollar amount of the
department/agency-wide reduction which you would experience. In
addition, please specify which of the following actions you would
find it necessary to take under such conditions. Answer sub-
questions "a" through "i" for,your overall department/agency.
Answer sub-questions "j" through "1" for each of your principal
sub-department/agency components. Answer pertinent questions in
terms of the actual number of people involved rather than FTE's.
Attach additional sheets of paper wherever you find it necessary
to provide and/or explain all the information requested.
Department/agency
Estimated amount of reduction
a) delay procurements:
I) noncapital acquisitions: # delayed
total $ amount
II) capital acquisitions: # delayed
total $ amount
b) restrict travel: total $ amount
% of total travel budget
c) restrict training: total $ amount
% of total training budget
d) freeze hiring: duration in months
if not affecting whole agency, specify the
components affected
resultant reduction in workforce
because of attrition:
# & % of permanent employees
reduced
# & % of temporary employees
reduced
# & % of other employees
reduced
e) furlough: # of days
# of people affected
% of workforce involved
f) rif : # of people affected
% of workforce involved
g) retire early: # of people affected
% of workforce involved
h) delay maintenance and repairs: # of projects
total $ amount
i) close field locations
(specify where):
j) reduce service to the public (specify component and
program and give amount and percent of reduction in
each):
I) inspections: amt. & % reduced
II) audits:. amt. & % reduced
III) technical assistance: amt. & % reduced
IV) other (specify) amt. & % reduced
k) reduce benefits available to the public (specify component
and program and give amount and percent of reduction
in each):
I) grants: amt. & % reduced
II) loans: amt. & % reduced
III) other (specify) amt. & % reduced
1) raise user fees (specify component, program, and amount
of increase in each):
m) other (provide details):
Approved For Release 2010/12/21 : CIA-RDP90B01390R000300420021-8