FEDERAL EMPLOYEES LIABILITY REFORM AND TORT COMPENSATION ACT OF 1988

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
7
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 16, 2012
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 31, 1988
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1.pdf457.7 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT Xi fir"' ..? 31 October 1988 CCA 3627-88 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Administrative Law Division/OGC Chief, Litigation Eivision/OGC FROM: Legislation Division Office of Congressional Affairs SUBJECT: Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 18 1. Attached, for your information, is a copy of the above-captioned till, which was recently passed by Congress. It provides generally for the Federal Government to be the exclusive means for compensation- of persons injured by tortious acts committed by Federal employees. 2 Shnn16 ou have any questions, please telephone me on Attachment OCA/LEC Distribution: Orig - addressees 1 - D/OCA (w/o att.) 1 - DDL/OCA (w/o att. 1 - SA/OCA (attn: 1 - RMH Cbrono o att. 1 - OCA Records (Watt.) 1 - OCA/LEG Subj. File (w/att.) OCARead 31 Oct 88 (w/o att.) Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 LEOI-SLATE Report for the 100th Condress Mon, October 7f,1, 1988 2.01pm (EDT) Report for H.R.4L12 Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 198C As finally approved by the House and Senate (Enrolled), A:T THE SECOND SSSION Complete Text of this version H.R.4L,12 One Hundredth Congress of the United States. of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Pedun and held at the City of Washington On Monday, the twenty-fifth day of January one thousand nine hundred and eiohtv-eicht An Act To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for an exclusive remedy against the Unied States for suits based upon certain negligent or wrongful acts or emicir-in'=, of United States employees committed within the scope of their employment, and Tor other purposes. Se it enacted by the Senate and HOUSE of Representatives of the United ,States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE, This Act may be cited as the 'Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act of 1988". SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES. (a) Findincs.--The Congress finds and declares the following: (1) For more than 40 years the Federal Tort Claims Act has been the ledal mechanism for compensating persons injured by negligent or wrongful acts of Federal employees committed within the scope of their employment. (2) The United States, throuch the Federal Tort Claims Act, is responsible to injured persons -for the common law torts of its employees in the same manner in which the common law historically has recognized the responsibility of an employer for torts committed by its employees within the scope of their employment. (7) Because- Federal employees for many years have been protected from personal common law tort liability by a broad based immunity, the Federal Tort Claims Act has served as the sole means for compensating persons injured by the tortious conduct of Federal employees. (4) Recent judicial decisions, one particularly the decision of the United States Supreme Court in West-Fall v. Erwin, have seriously eroded the common law tort immunity previously available to Federal employees. Declassifiedin Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 LECI-ELATE Report Page 2 October 31, 199E lI ability has created an immediate crisis involving the prospect of persona:1 liability and the threat of protracted peesenal tort litigation -fOr? the entire Federal worieforce. proapeet of such liability will seriously undermine the morale and wall being of Federal employees, impede the ability of agenciee to Larry net their missions, and diminish thc vitality of the Federal Tort Cla.i.ms net as the proper remedy for Federal employee torts. (7) in its opinion in Westfall v. Erwin, the. Supreme Court indieated that the Congress is in the best position to determine the extent to which Fede:al Employees should be pereonally liable for common law torte, and that legislative consideration of this matter would be. ueeful. (b) Purpuee.--it is the purpose of this Act to protect Federal empleyees from personal liability for. cemmon law torts committed within the scoLe of their employment, while providing persons injured by the COMM:Dr; laJe torte of Fedeeal. employeee with an appropriate remedy against the United States. SEC. 3. JUDICIAL AND LEGISLATIVE DR-NCH EMPLOYEES, Sectjon 2n7i title 28, United ,States Code, is amended in the first full paeagraoh by inserting after "ecoutive departments," the following "the judiciel and )egielative branches,". EEC, 4, PETENTION OF DEFENSES. Cection 267%! of title 2E, United States Code, is amended by addine at -!'he End o4 the section the following new paragraph:: th reapect to any claim under this. chapter, the United States shall be entitled to assert any defense based upon judicial or legislative immunity which otherwise would have whose act or omeseion gave which the United States is been available to the employee of the United States rise to the claim, aa well as ary other defenses to untitled.". SEC. 5. E_CLUSIVENESS OF REMEDY. Section 267(b) of title 2E, United Statee Code, is amended to read as foIlews "(b)(1) The remedy against the United States provided by sections 13:46(b) and 2672 of this title for injury or loss of property, or personal inury or death arisihd or rsSultint71 from the nedligent or wrongful act or omission of ary emplovee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment is exclueive of any other civil action or proceeding -for money damades by reason of the same subject matter adainst the employee whose act or- - omission gave rise to the claim or against the estate of such employee. Any other civil action or proceeding for money damages arising out of or relating to the same subject matter against the employee or the employee's estate is precluded without regard to when the act or omission occurred. "(2) Paragraph (1) does not extend or apply to a civil ahtiom against an employee of the Government-- "(A) which is brought States, or "(E) which is brought under which such action for a violation of the Constitution of the United for a violation of a statute of the United States against an individual is otherwise authoriced.". EEC. 6. REPRESENTATION AND REMOVAL. Section 2679(d) of title 28, United Stated. Code, is amended to read as follows "(d)(1) Upon certification by the Attorney General that the defendant employee was acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 LEGI-SLATE Report Fage October? 7M, 193P C ommenced UpLJH such claim in a United States district court shall be deemed an action against the Uoited States under the provisions. of this title. ane all refereneeec thereto, and the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant. "(2) Upon certification by the Attorney General that the defendaot employee wes acting within the scope of his office or employment at the time of. the incideot cut c-f which the claim arose, Ery civil aetioo or proceeding commenced upon suck Claim in a State court shall bE removed without bond at any time before trial by the Attorney General to the district court of the United Stated for the district and division emboacinc the place in which the action or proeueding is poach no. Such action or proceeding shall be deemed to be an action or proceedino bt ought. against the United States under the provisions ef this.. title and all re+erences thereto, and the Unitec Statep shall be substituted as the party defendant. This certificatioo of the Attorney General shall conclue,ively establish seppe ofTice or emplovriIt for purposes of removal. "(21) In the eveot that the Attorney General has re .fused to certify a: con- of office or employment undee this section, the emp:oyee may at any time before trial petitioo the court to find and certi4'y that the employee NEE acting within the scope of his offihe or employment, Upon such certification by the. court, such action or proceedino ehall be deemed to be or action or preceeding brought against. the United States under the provisions of this title and referenees thereto, and the United States shall be substituted as the party defendant. A copy of the petition shall be served upon the United States in accordance with the provisions 0+ Rule 4(d)(Ir of the Federal Rules of Civil rroceduoe. In the event the petition is filed in a civil action or proceeding pendine in a State court, the action or proceeding may be removed without bond by the Attorney General to the district court the United .States -For the disteict and division embracinc the place in which it is pending. If, in considering the oetition, the dietriot court determines that the employee WEE not aetino within the scope of his office or employmeot, the action Dr proceeding sholl be remanded to the. State court. "(4 Upon certification, any action or proceeding subject to paragraph (1), (2), or (7) shall proceed in the same manner as any action against the United States filed pursuant to section :2-'c -b) of this title and shall be subject to the limitations and exceptions applicable to those actions. "(5) Whenever an action or proceeding in which the United States is Eubstituted as the party defendant under this subseetion is die.mie.eerl for failure first to present a claim pursuant to section 2L75(a) of this title, such a claim shall be dt.,.-Lj to be timely presented under section 2401(b) of this title if-- "(A) the claim would have Leo-fl timely had it been filed on the date the undeelying civil action was commenced, and '(2) the claim is presented to the appropriate Federal agency within 6,0 day,: after die.mie,sal of the civil action.", SEE, SVFRADILITY. If any provision of this Act or the amendments made by this Act or the application of the provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this Act and such amendments and the application of the- provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected by that invalidation.: SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. (a) General Rhle.--Thie, Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 LEG1-SLATE. Report Pace 4 Detober 7:*,1, 11E3 (LA Applicability to Proceedings.--The amendments made by this Aci shall apply to all claims, civil actions, and pnoceedings pending on, or filed on or after, the date cf the enactment of this (r t. Pec'jric-J State Proceedinge.--Nith respect to any civil action or proceedine per-dine in a State couet to which the amendments made by this Act anply, and as to wnich the period for removal under section 267c;(d) of title 28, United States Code (Ls amended by section 6 of this Act), has r-,:pired, the Attorney Seneral sha.13 have 60 days after the date C.-.)-- the enactment of this. Act durind which to seek removal under such section 2679(d). (d) Claims Aceruind Def ore Enaetmant,--With respect to any Ci'--i l aetien or proceeding to which the amendments made by this Act apply in which the claim accrued before the date of the enactment of this Act, the period during which the claim shall bc deemed to be timely presented under section 267(d)(5) of tite 2D, United States Code (as amended by section 6 of this Act) shall bc that pered within which the claim could have been timely fl ed under. applicable State law, but in no event shall such period exceed two years from the date ef the enactment ef this Act. SEC. C. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORlTY. E.:U.E.VEFIESE. of Remedy.--(1) An action against the Tennessee Valley Authority' foe injury or loss of property, er personal injury or death arisind or resWting from the neglicent or wrenpful act or omission of any employee Di the Tennessee Valley Authority while acting within the scope uf this office OF employment is exlusive uf any other civil action or prozeudirg by reason of the same snbiect matter against the employee or his estate whose act. or CiMiT'2,Si0:-. gave !--JS::E to the claim. Any other civil action or prOLEEdiflt74 arising cut of or relating to the same subject matter against the employee or his estate is peecluded without regard to when the act on omission occurred (2) Faraeraph (1) does not c:tend or apply to a cognisable action against an sip: over of the. 7-,71MESSEE Valle'>?. Authority for money damade -FE,r ..7-i VfOlLtiOci 04- the Cr_isttution of the Untiee 51',tates. (LO Repeesentation and Removal.--(1) Upon certification by the. TE2r1F.EE.,SPE Valley Authority that the defendant employee was acting within the scene of his 041-110E or Employment at the time of the incident out of which the Ci C. arose, any civil action or proceeding heretofore or hereafter ecnmenced upcn such eleeim in a United Stnats district eourt shall bc deemed an action against the Tennessee Valley Authority pursuant to 16 U.S.C. S:21C(b) and the Tennessee Valley Authonity shall ba substituted as the party defendant. (2:, Upon certification by the. Tennessee Valley Authority that the defendant employee was aetime within the scope of his office or employment at the time of the inciSeut out of which the claim arose, any civil action or proceeding eommenced upon such claim an a State court shall be removed vA.thout bond at any tjme before trial by the Tennessee Valley Authority to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place. wherein it is pending. Such action shall be deemed an action brought against the Tennessee Valley Authority under the provisions of this title and all refErenees thereto, and the Tennessee 'Valley Authority shall ba sfkbstituted as the party defendant. This certification of the Tennessee Valley Authority snail conclusively establish scope of office or employment -For purposes of r E iti 0 'Va. 1 . (7:) Ii- % the event that the Tennessee Valley Authority 1-1,--ts refused te certify scope of office or employment under this section, the employee mey at any time before trial petition the court to find and certify that the employee was acting within the scope of his office or employment. Upon such certification , by the court, such action shall be deemed an action brought against the '..... Tennessee Valley-Authority, and the Tennessee Valley Authority shall be Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1 LE E., I- SI...A-1 El: hop r&Qe 5 October 71, 19Bs substituted as the party defendant. A copy of the petition shall hE served upen the Tennessee Valley Authority im accordance with the Federal Ruies Civil Prodedure. In the event the petition is filed in a civil action or proceeding pond no in a State court, the action or proceeding may bE FE'LIWUCT without bond by the Tennessee Valley Authority to the district court of thf- United States for the district and division embracihr.g the place in which it is pendi.ng. lf, in considering the petition, the district court determines that the employee was not acting within the scope his office or emplovipent, the action cr- proceeding shall be remanded to the State court. (4) Upon certification, any actions subiect to paragraph Ci)., (2), or shalI proceed in the same manner as any action adainst the Tennessee Valley Authoriiy arc] shall be subject. to the limitations End eceptions app=icatie to those. actions- (c) Retention of Defenses.--With respect to any claim to which this seEtion appliES, the Tennessee Valley Authority shall be entitled to assert afl,,' defense which otherwise would have been available to the empleyee based upon judiciaj or legislative immunity, which otherwise. would have been available to the employee of the Tennessee Valley Authority whose act or- omission gave rise to the claim as well as any other defenses to which the Tennessee Valley Authority is entitled. Speafter of the House of Representatives. Vice President of the United States ane President of the Senate. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/16: CIA-RDP90M00005R000200030001-1