NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

PRESIDENT'S SECRECY ORDER IS UNNECESSARY AND UNWISE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100030148-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 17, 2012
Sequence Number: 
148
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 16, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100030148-5.pdf92.96 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/17: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100030148-5 LOUISVILLE COLRIER-JOURNAL (KY 16 March 1983 `secrecy order is necessar RONALD REAGAN is`'hardly the. first ? president to bemoan the fact that "confidential" information tends to. leak. through his administration's fin- gers like vanilla ice cream at the. beach in July. But. like his predeces- sors, he's the one who bit the end off the-cone. What does he expect?.'.- . _ .When an administration leaks: infor- niation to the media for its. own pur- poses, its example understandably en= courages others to do the same. That's not necessarily, bad: - our government would run a lot less smoothly if offi- cials couldn't float - trial balloons; or. criticize an agency's policies without being publicly identified'by name. But: where do you draw. the' Line? President Nixon, when he activated the "plumbers" to search for leakers in his administration, said 'he was' draw=:: ing the line at national security. But "national security," in the Nixon dic tionary, meant anything threatening his re-election. -Now it's President Reagan's turn. Just two months after' angrily- an- pouncing that' he'd "had it up to my keister with these leaks" " and ordering tighter controls on press contacts with White House staffers, he's going after the potentially more serious leakage of classified information. But his prescrip- i tion is a case of blatant overkill, a capitulation to the sort of police-state mentality. that was such a characteris- tic of the Nixon administration. Mr. Reagan: has' ordered that an' y4 federal employee with access to classi-4 fied'information must agree in advance to submit any writings for government review, and to submit to a lie-detector examination if asked - to do so by agents investigating a leak of such in- formation. This extends CIA practices. to the rate Department, House, Justice a ther agencies. It 'will intimidate a lot of people. But,. it won't work, as Kentucky's Senator Huddleston implied this. week, because it's a double standard. j ....... .... and., unwise Senator Huddleston, a member of the Senate's Select Committee on In-' telligence, notes that information pre- isented only days earlier to the commit- as 'classified was turned over to the world- by the Reagan administration when it published 300,000 copies of a Defense Intelligence Agency report on. .Soviet military power. The report was released, 'of course, to bolster President Reagan's attempts to head off ' congres sional cuts im defense spending. "Selective declassification," as Mr. Huddleston called: it, tends to make cynics . of - those. who deal with classi- fied data. When today's secret can be- come tomorrow's headline as -a. result of political expedience, it cheapens the value of secrecy and challenges the credibility of' the whole system. The same point is emphasized by the 'President's order that the writings of I everyone with access to ultra-secret documents be washed through a pre- publication screening. Theoretically, at 'l A east, that would apply not only to memoirs by former officials but maga- zine articles, novels and letters to the editor.' Yet in practice, as everyone knows, all outgoing presidents, secre- taries of state and other high officials now pepper their memoirs: with select- ed revelations cleared by no one but themselves. It's -a double standard that's unlikely to be changed, and thus it's guaranteed to fail. As for threatening all employees with lie detector tests, that's simply government by intimidation. The tests are of such questionable accuracy that 1, they're not even accepted in court. But security-fetishists love these machines for the fear they invoke. When even the innocent tremble at the thought of interrogation, as totalitarian regimes since the Spanish Inquisition have proved, then life becomes simpler for those 'in charge- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/17: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100030148-5