LEAKPROOF?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100060003-2
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 18, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100060003-2.pdf78.21 KB
Body: 
S7 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100060003-2 C;[RISTI.N soIEi`rcE ','ONITOR 18 December 1980 A United.. States ambassador tells us he refused to sign such an affidavit, "a presump never puts anything in ,a cable that be tive statement that says I'm a good boy." He: wouldn't mind seeing .in public print. It's not offered one reason for leaking:. exactly like the corporate. executive who says "There are some people there [the Whitei he never conducts business that he wouldn't House), who are major leakers themselves,f mind his children seeing on television.. The se- . who think the only way reporters get a story is crecy of official cables is not automatically to through a leak. They think reporters are clods conceal matters embarrassing to the govern- and animals, and that you simply feed them.. ment. It is to permit discussion of often deli-. Insofar as reporters fit that image, they' cafe-diplomatic,subjects:before, conclusions may lend themselves to the motives of the' are ready to be announced' . ; - leakers. However, the damming of leaks is That is why the recent leaking of Ambas not up to reporters but to those in the govern-1 sador 'Watson's messages from -Moscow.. ment responsible for maintaining legitimate wouldtiave'been outrageous even if the leaks secrecy. We were glad to hear Richard Allen, had-not apparently-been selectively engi-' often mentioned as the . next.nationalsecurity neered, to distort.-and :,discredit Senator adviser, condemn the leaks of Ambassadors Percy's long-known. moderation. on Mideast Watson's- cables in the strongest terms: To policy.. And that is why it is to be hoped the Hodding Carter the National Security Council Reagan team follows through on its criticism had been responsible for the "most subs tan-+ of leaking in respect to thePercy episode. tial.-leaks." If that was so- in the past,.',N ,Thewholeproblem.of--leaking"flared dur- - ?. Reagan has a chance to launch an admims- ing-. the campaigrr= when Republicans raised tration that is leakproof, at least at the top. the question of administration leaks of intelliWe do not know who did the leaking of thej gence information for political purposes. It is Watson cables, but Reagan officials property a kind of rule of thumb to Identify leaks with . took the occasion to warn their transition as- -thosewhostand to benefit,from them. sociates, who had been given access to them.-? Earlier,the'White House-was conducting Among the important reasons cited for not. its own inquiry_into4eakworr such matters as leaking cables was the need. for. trust by for military-aid to Morocco. It seems safe to say eign leaders that their conversations with that there are better ways to stop leaking of Americans could be kept in confidence. this sort than to demand. affidavits of inno- . Mr. Reagan in office will be challenged to i cence- from men-at, the top, such as national remember that the democratic goal should al- security adviser ~ Brzezinski,.. CIA chief ways bean open government with a minimum Turner.: and then Secretary of State Vance. of secrets from the public it represents - and After State: Department' Spokesman Hodding with the ability to preserve those secrets that Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100060003-2