DEPARTURE OF A GOOD SOLDIER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100060046-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
46
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 12, 1980
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100060046-5.pdf97.44 KB
Body: 
Si_ Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24: CIA-RDP91-00561R000100060046-5 Aepit.:,hEll t-JG PAGE az_ TIME 12 May 1980 Departure of a Good Soldier The chilling of Soviet-US. relations blighted Vance's dreams In his handwritten letter I of resignation to President Carter, Cyrus Vance de- clared: look with pride and satisfaction at the many actions and new directions : which have marked our for- eign policy under your lead- ership." Then he listed the accomplish- '"?? ments for which he wants to be remembered. Yet even that recitation ?by which Vance meant to console both Carter and himself?has a melancholy ring. It is a list of what may well turn out to be pyrrhic victories, noble failures and unfinished business: The Panama Canal treaties. The Administration's knock-down, drag-out, barely successful battle for Senate ratifi- cation left political scars that have still not healed. The Camp David accord and the Egyp- tian-Israeli peace treaty. That process, in which Vance played a key role, shows signs of slowing to a halt and perhaps col- lapsing altogether. Normalization of relations with the People's Republic of China. National Se- i curity Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski han- dled the announcement in a way that worsened Soviet-American relations and humiliated Vance by making him look as though he had been cut out of the play. The strengthening of our military forc- es and our alliances. The Administration's military buildup has threatened a new arms race with the U.S.S.R. without as- suaging congressional hawks, and NATO is racked by new strains, including dis- agreements over whether to modernize U.S. missiles in Europe. The negotiation of the SALT II agree- ment. This masterpiece of modern diplo- macy is as much Vance's handiwork as anyone's, but it may never become law. The new thrust and direction given to our relations with the nations of the Third World. The U.S. seems baffled and threat- ened by upheaval in the Third World as I never before. Vance leaves behind considerable ad- miration at the State Department, but it is tinged with disappointment. On the one hand, the foreign service officers are grateful to him for devoting many hours to testifying on Capitol Hill on behalf of reforms that would improve salaries and benefits, streamline an archaic and oc- cluded promotion system, and raise the quality and morale of ambassadors. Un- like Kissinger, Vance showed great re- spect for the professionalism of career dip- lomats and increased their role in day- to-day policymaking. But the participatory system he in- troduced did not entirely mesh with his own rather remote personality. He was awkward in large meetings, uncomfort- able about knocking heads, and he pre- ferred to delegate unpleasant jobs. Even some of Vance's staunchest admirers at Foggy Bottom fault him for not going to the mat more often to protect the depart- ment against empire building by other agencies. The far more important battle that Vance 'could never bring himself to wage with a vengeance was with the National Security Council and Zbig Brzezinski. In a number of conversations during the postelection transition in 1976, the two men agreed that one of their biggest prob- lems would be to keep their staffs from each other's throats. They turned out to be right. Immediately after his Inaugu- ration, Carter promulgated presidential Decisions 1 and 2, a plan for restructur- ing and strengthening the National Se- curity Council. A group of Vance's aides bearded their boss in his office and alert- ed him to what they saw as Brzezinski's opening move in a power play against the State Department. Vance told them: "I'm not going to make an issue over it. The best way to keep it from becoming a problem is not to get all excited about it." One of his aides persisted. Vance frowned and his eyes narrowed. "I don't want to hear any more of this," he said sternly. "We're not going to have that kind of squabbling." Yet the squabbling continued for the' next three years. both behind closed doors and, increasingly, in public. When a sen- sitive piece of information about Soviet- American relations leaked to the press, a number of top NSC officials immediately ?and falsely?accused Vance's Soviet1 affairs adviser, Marshall Shulman, of be- ing the source. When an article appeared 11 revealing a U.S7espionage operation, a middle-level State Department?affc-ir spread the rumor?fa?that Triz-ezin- ski's deputyDavid Aaron, -Fa planted the story. EX CEi-TTED Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/08/24: CIA-RDP91-00561R000100060046-5