WASHINGTON - CIA DIRECTOR WILLIAM COLBY WOULD WELCOME RESPONSIBLE CONGRESSIONAL SUPERVISION OF THE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY'S ACTIVITIES BUT LEAKS OF SECRETS MUST BE PLUGGED IF THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES IS TO BE PROTECTED AND THE DANGER

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100090049-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 24, 2012
Sequence Number: 
49
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 30, 1976
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100090049-9.pdf114.99 KB
Body: 
STAT ' Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/24: CIA- BAL T IP-MORE 1IE41 S A?lE.'R ICA: 30 JANUARY 1970 s This is the third ii a sesf fo = whelmig i ieri-ourn articles based on an. exclw,vve Interv e o m Commentary congressme; w with ~o:r er CIA Director .William. E.-: taro a stron Colby__ '," ~t .: z. service, inel .. r.-: ..-. -- y ,., b TteHearstNeNSpapeis?;:'._":=, ns~c.;ecmbers to stno leaks which harm He is cortt,dent Congress as a whole` Baia Colby would `welcome responsible".' the olives 'of its patriotic intelligence pervasion of the CIA and adopt a respon- congressional supervision.-of they intel!i" agents and weaken- American Iead rship' sable' attitude . He towards the plugging of gerce -agency's activities- but :1efiks of , of the free world z,. intetti;ence leaks recalled that both secrets must be plugged if-the security of He' else feels .strongly that -severe the Senate and Haase voted by a 3 to I the United-States is to be protected'and criminal' sanctions-. should;: be : applied ,;ma;oriry against banning the CIe~'s cov- the danger of nuclear war averted:"- against: 'congressional: staff members ert operations and by a margin'of 2 to 1 in favor -of. keeping the-CIA budget, The leaks by a small number of sonar who leak intelligence secrets: given- in secret. t - : ,-_ tors and- congressmen-and their. staffs, confidence - to; members---of Congress. `. Following is a condendenseedd totext of the which 'already. have: cost America the Similar penalties should; in his opinion third part of the a co few with ".loss--of. important: foreign . intelligence .;' be imposed on those CIA employees who. `-contacts, are_ undermining the. covert 'leave the service and then betray their the CIA director -operations of what has'proved to:be the ;_' clleagues-'and'-country'by`disclosing .Q _' Sen.-Fran, Church has proposed '-best intelligence service in the world;. names and-other highly confidential'in- oversight committee of 9 senators and 34-'-These were the impressions gathered -. formation to which they had access` possibly some additional members of the during an hour-long exclusive interview 11 while'serving' under-oath with the - -House: If you have a dozen or more with the man whose 25 years of service _ agercy. meow rs of Congress getti g the secrets in. American intelligence work have The World.Wa Il hero,:who Para- of your intelligence-operations, can you earned him a reputation among his peers chuted behind. enemy lines in both prevent lea';s~ = f as "outstandingly capable." France and Norway to help block Ger , :. -Colby believes that Congress, which. '' man troop movements ? believes an over- 1 could get it. down to 9, 1 t.: tWould be yery happy; The problem now lsthat anything we do-?otherthan intelli- sgence- gathering'musr: be:.briefed to six comniittees'oI the Congress.:That means something'like 30 to 50 senators and con- gressmen:-Practically- everything we' have briefed'this year has been leaked to the news media.l'-:;._ What: abobtl thg?:congressional staffs?.. ~.1:..~ :?ta? c aye; A - "Theoretically; the s'taffs:are not supposed~to-bean on it but of course the-. embers tell their staffs.:';':' Q '-Would It be practical to limit the' 4members-of Congress who are'given se-1 `cret Information to' the chairman of the' tSenate Intelligence and foreign relations committees; and.-the similar-House, {committees? ?, {.~,.A _'There'are two'aspects'of these -crecy problem: One is secrecy as it`ap. plies. to'..employees and former' employees of the CIA, Our laws are be. { weak on that. We need some`good laws.; with criminal sanctions for peopi-who'? join'the intelligence business, learn se-? crets while they are employed, Viand then go cut and reveal them. }?''_-# t "Ninety nine percent of the C!A em ployees want such laws because they areF professionals- and they believe, proles-Y sional discipline, is necessary ? in thi business;Those who don'rrabide? by the ~l .discipline should be punished. 'Otherwise'! we cannot run our profession effectively:'! "The: other side of the problem is: Congress. Congress never has really ar- ticulated arty systematic way of keeping secrets .:.They never had to do so because in the'nncr. rr,e Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/02/24: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100090049-9