ADMINISTRATION FRUSTRATED BY LEAKS EXPOSING FOREIGN POLICY DISCORDS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100110009-0
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
March 9, 2012
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 18, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100110009-0.pdf92.38 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/03/09: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100110009-0 WASHINGTON POST 18 May 1986 Administration Frustrated by Leaks Exposing Foreign Po licy Discords Partisan Lower-Level Officials Seek to Influence Policy NEWS ANALYSIS By John M. Goshko Washington Post Staff Writer The firing of two Reagan admin- istration officials who allegedly leaked classified information is a sign not only of mounting tension between government and the news are conservatives who apparently adversaries. It recently caused Cen- sought to influence debate over kC tral Intelligence Agency Director controversial policies. Pillsbury, a William J. Casey to threaten to em- long-time associate of Republican ploy a w orohibitintr disclo- sure of communications intelligence against five publications that re- ported U.S. interception of Libyan messages. Secretary of State George P. Shultz, frequently on the opposite side from Casey in policy debates, has become so upset at what he termed a "gusher" of leaks that he told reporters last week: "We've got to find the people who are doing it and fire them." To emphasize the seriousness of his threat, Shultz seized on the Warren case and had a department spokesman take the unprecedented step of announcing at the Friday press briefing that an official had been fired for leaking classified material. media. It also illus- trates the administra- tion's frustration at having its own ideological divisions over foreign policy exposed to pub- lic view. In both firings-of Defense De- partment official Michael E. Pills- bury last month and of State De- partment speech writer Spencer C. Warren on Friday-the alleged of- fenses had no relationship to con- servative charges that President Reagan is the victim of liberal-lean- ing career bureaucrats seeking to thwart the policies of a conserva- tive leader. Instead, both ousted employes conservatives who believe that ad- ministration policy is dominated by moderates, was suspected of leak- ing information about aid to anti- communist guerrillas in Angola and Afghanistan; Warren, a lesser- known figure, reportedly admitted leaking a diplomatic cable charging House Speaker Thomas P. (Tip) O'Neill Jr. (D-Mass.) with attempt- ing to undermine Reagan's policy of pressure on Nicaragua. Sensitivity about such disclosures has increased at a time when Rea- gan increasingly emphasizes covert action and combating international terrorism. Invariably, leaks about these issues spill into the area of intelligence activities that the ad- ministration considers too sensitive to disclose. That is why concern about stem- ming the flow of leaks has become close to a fixation at the highest levels and has created unanimity among officials usually regarded as Leaks to the news media have been a source of White House ag- gravation for at least two decades. In the past, though, when they in- volved the inner workings of gov- ernment, they usually described turf fights between competing of- ficials-for example, Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance and national security affairs adviser Zbigniew Rrzezinski in the Carter years. However, in the Reagan era, the leaks have become a weapon in the ongoing policy-making struggle be- tween such officials as Shultz, who generally follows a pragmatic ap- proach to foreign policy while out- spokenly advocating force to com- bat terrorism, and Casey and De- fense Secretary Caspar W. Wein- berger, who advocate an unrelent- ingly tough line on Central America and arms control and other dealings with the Soviet Union. The leaks generally come from partisan lower-level officials. Fre- quently they can be traced to con- servatives whose allegiance is to ideology and believe that their views have been frozen out of the policy process. Department officials, insisting that Shultz does not want to cut off the flow of "legitimate news" to the media, said he considers leaks, whether of intelligence matters or dealings with other governments, a threat to national security and is determined to force his employes to maintain confidentiality and resolve disputes through internal channels. Casey, speaking Thursday to the American Jewish Congress "from 30 years of experience as a friend, participant and supporter of the media," insisted that "the media, like everyone else, must adhere to the law." And he stated: "I hasten to add that the first line of defense and the most effective way of prevent- ing leaks is to increase discipline within the government itself." t/ Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/03/09: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100110009-0