MR. CASEY VS. THE PRESS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100110020-7
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 7, 2012
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 15, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100110020-7.pdf65.79 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/08: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100110020-7 .U ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH (MO) 15 May 1986 Casey V The Press CIA Director William Casey is on thj") warp ; he wants criminal prosecution o news organizations for allegedly publishing classified data. Although the Justice De- partment is quoted as saying that "cooler heads will prevail," this effort to punish the press is, sadly, in keeping with the Reagan administration's past actions. The CIA director is reportedly angry over leaks about U.S. interceptions of Liby- an communications that tied Col. Kha- dafy's agents directly to the West Berlin disco bombing. Mr. Casey is particularly outraged with The Washington +o&% which quoted the messages and listed details on the intercepts, thus allowing the Libyans to pinpoint which codes the United States had managed to compromise. In Mr. Casey's mind, the Post is In direct violation of a little-used 1950 law that makes it a felony to publish information about cryptographic systems and code-breaking activities, even .though this particular law has never been used to prosecute a news organization for revealing such data. What is ironic is that the ~story was a follow-up article on President Reagan's television speech announcing the U bombing of Libya. Mr. Reagan cited refit" and "precise" evidence of messages between Tripoli and the Libyan People's Beau in East Berlin ordering the disco bombing. One would assume that Libyan intelligence would be smart enough to con- clade from Mr. Reagan's remarks which of itscodes had been broken. Mr. Casey reportedly has a secondary agenda in his current anti-press campaign: He wants to intimidate The Washington Post from publishing a story on Ronald Pelton, a former employee of the code- breaking National Security Agency who was arrested last November on charges of spying for the Soviets. The Post allegedly has classified information on the case, and Mr. Casey wants legal action against the paper if it publishes the information. Whether to reveal sensitive information in a news story is a tough judgment call for editors and reporters; the use of such Infor- mation is generally decided on a case-by- case basis. Also, there is no question that some information is legitimately classified and should be kept secret in the name of national security. That said, however, Mr. Casey's suggestions for criminal prosecu- tion seem to be an end run to establish a de facto, British-style "Official Secrets Act," which could prevent the publication of any so-called top secret material. That would represent an effort to undermine the First Amendment's freedom of the press. The details about intercepted Libyan messages and information about the Pelton case more than likely were leaked by very high sources within the administration rather than by some low-level staffer. (The director knows that the U.S. ship of state is the only ship that leaks from the bridge.) If Mr. Casey wants to stop this flow of secret material, he should start at the top and not attempt to silence the press. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/08: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100110020-7