NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

MEDIA WARNED AGAINST DISCLOSURE OF SECRETS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00561R000100120012-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 3, 2012
Sequence Number: 
12
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 7, 1986
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00561R000100120012-5.pdf115.58 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/03: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100120012-5 0 ARTICLE APPRED. PAGE ..i_._ A I z jV*h8h111" , Pelton Trial Opsns Medfa Warned Against Disclosure of Secrets In a major and unusual development, the direc- Lion, thus making it easier tors of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Na- such as the tional Security Agency have warned the news basis that it media against "speculation and reporting details" about U.S. communications intelligence activities being discussed at the trial of former NSA analyst Ronald Pelton. Pelton is accused of providing the Soviets with detailed information about highly secret U.S. intelligence-gathering systems aimed at the Soviet Union. The warning by CIA Director William Casey and NSA Director Lt. Gen. William Odom came one day after the Washington Post went beyond reporting what had transpired on the first day of the trial and disclosed the secret location of a U.S. listening device that Pelton was said to have com- promised. The Post cited "informed sources" for its report and published a map of the area in ques- tion near the Soviet Union. In opening the government's case against Pelton, prosecutor John Douglas and other witnesses described in general terms the nature of the NSA's activities and the intelligence systems that Pelton was said to have betrayed. But they did not provide such details as code names or loca- tions. On May 19, before the trial began, NBC cor- respondent James Polk reported the code name and location of one of the secret operations that Pelton is accused of compromising. The report prompted CIA Director Casey to issue a statement that Polk's story, "if true," had violated a section of U.S. law (18 United States Code 798) against disclosing information about the communications intelligence activities of the U.S. Casey said he was referring the matter to the Justice Department for possible prosecution. Some reporters, such as Lesley Stahl of CBS and Sam Donaldson of ABC, have insisted that the government has no reason to threaten the media for publishing information that is said to have already been provided to the Soviets by Pelton. But Prosecutor Douglas, in going public with only general descriptions of NSA activities, said it's still necessary to keep the details secret because other governments would like to obtain the information. Moreover, intelligence experts maintain that press disclosures can authenticate or pro- vide added confirmation of secret informs- for governments to proceed on the legitimate. As HUMAN EVENTS has reported, Director Casey has already accused the Post and other publications of having violated the law when they described in detail the nature of the Libyan com- munications intercepted by U.S. intelligence show- ing a Libyan link to the German disco bombing that killed an American serviceman. President Reagan had described in general terms the nature of the messages in his justification of the U.S. military strike against Libya. At the time, rather than recommend prosecution over that violation, Casey warned the Post against publishing another such article on U.S. com- munications intelligence capabilities. The article, which was published, on May 21, was about the alleged disclosures of Pelton. In fact, it was shortly after NBC reporter Polk went public with his detailed description of an operation Pelton was said to have compromised that the Post published its own story. The Post said that Pelton had compromised "a costly, long- running and highly successful U.S. operation that used sophisticated technology to intercept Soviet communications..." The Post said the operation involved the use of submarines bat didn't provide any further details. The Post explained that it had prepared "a more detailed version of this article" but had been warned by Casey, other top U.S. officials, and even President Reagan himself that its publication would harm national security. Post executive Editor Benjamin C. Bradlee said the original ver- sion was not published because, according to the article, the Post was "unable fully to judge the validity of the national security objections of senior officials, and because of Post lawyers' con- cerns .... " However, after Pelton's trial opened on May 27, the Post published its article about the trial which revealed the location of one of the operations Pelton was said to have betrayed. The location had .not been disclosed by Prosecutor Douglas in open- ing his case against Pelton. Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/03: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100120012-5 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/03: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100120012-5 2 However, Douglas and other witnesses did pro- vide general descriptions of the operations, which were referred to as "projects." For instance, one was said to involve the collection of "command and control information" from the "highest level" of the Soviet government to the next highest level. In their joint statement warning the news media against publishing "speculation" and "details". about the operations, Directors Casey and Odom acknowledged that the government's case against Pelton "will include release of certain classified in- formation involving communications intelligence activities of the United States." The statement added,"While not intending any comment on this ongoing criminal prosecution, it should be understood that the decision to make use of this information in trial has been made by ap- propriate government authorities after careful consideration of the demands of the trial and the potential harm that release of this selected data may cause the national security. The information thus selected has been carefully chosen to balance these competing interests. "Those reporting on the trial should be cau- tioned against speculation and reporting details beyond the information actually released at trial. Such speculations and additional facts are not authorized disclosures and may cause substantial harm to the national security." Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/02/03: CIA-RDP91-00561 R000100120012-5