(UNTITLED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00682R000300200010-9
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 23, 2006
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 15, 1951
Content Type: 
MFR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00682R000300200010-9.pdf71.82 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP91-00682R000300200010-9 15 August 1951 1. Mr. Carlisle Humelsine, Deputy Under Secretary of State for Administration, and Mr. Pforzheimer met with Senators McCarran and Ferguson, the ranking members of the Internal Security Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, to discuss certain aspects of the appearance of John Davies, of the Department of State, before the Subcommittee. 2. Mr. Humelsine pointed out that the Subcommittee, through Senator Smith of North Carolina, had asked Mr. Davies for the authority by which Davies had stated that conversations he had had with representatives of CIA were classified and could not be discussed with the Subcommittee. Mr. Humelsine stated that the subject of the particular conversation was classified Top S:?cret as it was a highly classified type of operation. I under- lined the fact that not only was this particular project so classi- fied, but, as both Senators understood, the very fact that the Government engaged in certain types of operations should not be acknowledged or given any discussion. 3. Senator Ferguson's initial position was that he knew in general of these operations, and it was his opinion there was no reason why the Subcommittee could not be informed of its general nature without going into any details. 4. The Senators then inquired as to why Mr. Davies had been in this picture at all, and Mr. Humelsine pointed out that it was the Department's role in 1949 to give guidance to these opera- tions. He stated that General Smith had told him that had he been the Director at the time, he might have approved the project under appropriate safeguards, and in fact 25X1X Mr. riumelsine stated turther that the Department had very carefully examined these charges and was quite satisfied that Davies had not intended anything subversive in making his suggestion. He further stated that the charges had been carefully aired in the loyalty hearing on Davies, and that he had been cleared. It was State Dept. review completed 25X1X OGC Has Rev w iippeoved For Release 2007/02/08: CIA-RDP91-00682R000300200010-9 Approved For Release 2007/02/08 : CIA-RDP91-00682R000300200010-9 pointed out that in the nature of these operations such a proposal would not be amiss, particularly as in this case the use of ''cut- outs" had been recommended. 5. The Senators asked how General Smith felt about Davies and this incident, and I told them that General Smith felt quite satisfied as to Davies, had spoken most highly of him in his hook, and had expressed his opinion to me of satisfaction as to Davies as a person. 6. It was our impression at the close of the conversation that Senators McCarran and Ferguson will not require Davies to produce the data they have requested and that they probably will not pursue the matter any further. Walter L. Pforzheimcr? Legislative Counsel k cc - AD/OPC Approved For Release 2007/02/08; CIA-RDP91-00682R000300200010-9