PEOPLE TO WATCH...

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00901R000500230029-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 14, 2016
Document Release Date: 
November 30, 2000
Sequence Number: 
29
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 19, 1985
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00901R000500230029-0.pdf218.25 KB
Body: 
25X1A Approved For Release 20M04ITMACIA-RDP91-00901 ROW640 5 0 19 F b 19 e ruary, 8 m x AIWA mom o o,,ple to W un ... Admi- ral Bobby R- Inman, the for- mer deputy CIA chief who heads Microelectronics Cannd Computer Technology chair- man has been named deputy man of the Dallas Federal Re- serve Bank. Approved For Release 2003/04/02 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500230029-0 Releae 2003/04/02 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500230029-0 PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER STATINTL 13 February 1985 puter consortium on course By Terry Bivens Inquirer Staff Writer AUSTIN, Texas - Seldom has a company been launched with the fanfare and high expectations that surrounded Microelectron- ics & Computer Technology Corp. The company, known as MCC, was con- ceived three years ago as a computer-re- search consortium. Its 12 charter members included such industry titans as Sperry Corp., Honeywell Inc. and Control Data Corp., and its mission ranked high in both importance and glamour. MCC would lead a concerted counterattack against Japan's well-publicized plan to dominate computer technology by the mid-1990s. A year later, the company added to its reputation with an unprecedented make-me- a-deal search for a headquarters site. Austin, the state capital and home of the University of Texas, outbid 56 other US. cities - includ- ing Philadelphia - to capture MCC in May 1983. The price was high - a financial-aid package of 522.5 million and a free Learjet - but Austin's payback began almost immedi- ately. "Within two days of MCC's arrival here, real estate people rented out one million square feet of office space," said Meg Wilson, science and technology director for Gov. Mark White, who made the quest for MCC almost a personal crusade. "Everybody here _was delighted." But as state and local officials here toasted.' their economic coup with champagne and Lone Star beer MC'C chairman Rohhy R Inman, _a retired Navy admiral and former deputy director of the CIA, began the nuts- and-bolts task of coi venting M CCs vast po- tential into commercial success for its 12 shareholder compa nie5. Inman quickly discovered that harnessing fiercely competitive U.S. companies into a unified effort - even one as critical as devel- oping the computers of tomorrow - is easier said than done. "The idea of MCC -runs counter to two powerful currents in American business," said Inman, 53. "U.S. companies aren't used to working with their competition, and they aren't used to investing money in long-term projects. At our first meetings here, there was an aura of distrust and a lot of apprehen- sion." Yet Inman, whose scholarly appearance and ingenuous manner belie his long career in milita intelligence, has a arently pule it He discussed the early trigs, evolution and recent successes of MCC dur- ing an interview at the company's temporary offices on a crowded freeway outside of Aus- tin. Next year, MCC will move into a gleam- ing new $20 million headquarters building on the university campus - a part of the so- called "Texas incentive" that lured MCC here. Although commercial products based on MCC's research are at least four or five years away, Inman said, the company is well ahead of schedule. Last month, for example, Bell Communications Research Inc. confirmed re- ports that it has applied for membership in MCC. Known as Bellcore, the Livingston, N.J., company is the research and development arm of seven regional telephone companies, including Philadelphia-based Bell Atlantic. Inman would not comment on Bellcore's application, other than to describe it as "a major vote of confidence" in MCC. Yet he said that Bellcore, if approved for member- ship, would become the 21st shareholder company in MCC. The company's roster now includes such industrial giants as 3M Co., Eastman Kodak Co., Lockheed Co., Martin Marietta Corp., Rockwell International Corp. and RCA Corp. Investments by the member companies have also grown, some by as much as 67 percent, said Palle Smidt, an ex-Sperry execu- tive who is MCC's senior vice president for planning. After an initial membership pay- ment of $150,000 to $500,000 (depending on when a company joined MCC), member com- panies may choose which MCC project they will pursue. The projects then require extra investments of money and manpower. Progress has been uneven because of the timings of hirings and the timespan of the projects themselves, said Inman. The projects are broken down into four areas: computer aided-design of complex integrated circuits; semiconductor packaging; software technology, and advanced computer architecture, which in- cludes work on artificial intelli- gence. MCC's internal budget for those projects was $30 million last year; by 1986, it will be $65 million. For the member companies, the cost of participating in those pro- grams can run up to $1 million a year, and those funds must be com- mitted for periods ranging from three to 10 years. In return, compa- nies receive exclusive licensing rights to MCC technologies for three Approved For Release 2003/04/02 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500230029-0 ears. After that, MC 9% ited with ,s 94 -rb~6 eFor Rele ~Yb If a 6t- 1-OO9O1 ROOO5OO23OO29-D' the results to anyone. easing ear y Said Inman: "Our job is to develop antitrust problems with MCC. In r the the technology. How the companies developmental stages. those use it commercially is up to them. may have frightened away compa* There is certainly no guarantee that nies such as Westinghouse. Bur, s all companies will profit equally. roughs and Xerox, according some No matter which companies even- observers. But Inman, through his helped p tually profit, however, much of the credit must go to Inman, most ob- servers said. Inman is said to have shepherded many skittish companies through the sometimes-traumatic ex-. perience of sharing technology with their competitors, and was ultimate- ly responsible for persuading them to provide some of their more talent- ed researchers. i Inman minimized such competi- tive problems, but he acknowledged that some companies were initially afraid that participation in MCC would lead to the loss of trade se- crets. Moreover, he allowed that some firms "undoubtedly" offered their best researchers financial in- centives for not joining MCC. "There is always a tendency to send who's available, not. who's best," he said. But Inman apparently solved that problem by hiring officials who were not_emvloYees at shareholder firms. Six of 1VICC's seven project directors were "outside hires," he said, as are about 60 percent of MCC's 188 researchers. In all, the company has 269 employees. "That was unexpected,", he said. "At first, the shareholder companies.". i1 Talented researchers from non- shareholder companies gave Inman leverage. Several of the sharehold- ing companies were reported to have expressed concern that those outside hirings would dilute their influence within MCC. Inman would not com- ment directly, but noted that the 'percentage of MCC employees herisen shareholder comp during the last year. Despite some fears to the contrary,, Inman. said. he had never encoun- tered a situation in which ark mpen ployee of .a shareholding owhich was poaching w tlinvolvede, in D. n o as that company The Write for Joining MCC is too nigh I v, c011! to 'Din rust to find out what the cvuw~~?~=~-- t " said Inman who in addition to his C1A work also served as direnM "And if we did find someono lthat ect ing information on a p we' d send they were not a party to, them home immediately. contacts in Washington, legislation that eliminated that threat. In spite of his successes so far, Inman was cautious about the fate of MCC. He noted that some of the lead. ing companies in computer research - most notably, IBM and AT&T - have not joined MCC, apparently be- cause their research efforts could profit little from information from other companies. Too, he said, many of MCC's projects could be risky. "Sometimes I wonder if our goals are too ambitious," he said. "In many areas, we are trying to leapfrog out into technologies that are decades away. There will be failures. "But I'm confident that we can develop technology as good as the Japanese and their Fifth Generation project," he said, referring to the Japanese computer-development plan. "in something like this, you're never as far along as you'd like to be, but we're certainly ahead of where I thought we'd be 15.months ago.' Certainly, there is no disappoint- . ment among state officials and resi dents of Austin, a central Texas city that Is bracketed by the Colorado River and a series of lakes known as the Highlands. Gov. White is among the many Texas officials who are i promoting Austin and the University of Texas as a Southern alternative to Stanford University and Silicon Val- h - ley - Silicon Hills is the Texas catc word - and MCC was the crown jewel in that campaign. Wilson, the governor's adviser, said_ an economic! urve _ done by Texas Commerce Bancshares, a Houston bank-holding company, esti- mated that MCC could directly create as many as 10,000 new jobs in elec- tronics in the Austin area with the next seven years. Lee Cooke, president of the Austin Chamber of Commerce, said MCC al., sad had begun to show the expect- ed "magnet effect," drawing other high-technology firms and their em- ployees into the area. The city's popu- lation is now 400,000, Cooke said, compared with 341,000 in 1980.-Cooke estimated that MCC's economic rip- ple effect could reach $500 million. Indeed, Austin's economic boom has produced some unwanted side effects. "Real estate prices are soaring in Austin," Inman said. "In fact, that's the only down note." Approved For Release 2003/04/02 : CIA-RDP91-00901 R000500230029-0