THE STORY OF THE BIG COVER-UP

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91-00901R000700090048-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 13, 2005
Sequence Number: 
48
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 11, 1974
Content Type: 
MAGAZINE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91-00901R000700090048-3.pdf132.99 KB
Body: 
Last week's indictment touched only NEWS1gMK briefly on the cntang1Atp } et 1=&,iRelease RoA&/ P IA-RDP91-00901 R0 tral Intelligence Agency and the Fed eral Bureau of Investigation in the web of Watergate. And it was remarkable as much for what it left out as for what it included. Foremost among the omissions,, in fact, were the factors that apparently led to the involvement of the espionage agency in the first place. On June 20, the indictment noted, Mardian and LaRue met with Liddy at LaRue's apartment. It was at this meet- ing that Liddy allegedly talked about certain "commitments" that had been made to him and others involved in the Watergate operation. As described to the Ervin committee, these were appar- ently reassurances that the undercover operatives would be taken care of if caught. Liddy's claim apparently was the basis for all subsequent efforts to obtain money or clemency for the defendants. What the indictment avoided mention- ing, however, was Liddy's implicit threat at that meeting; according to testimony before the Watergate, committee, he said he and others on the Watergate team had taken on earlier iitelligence opera- tions for the White House itself-includ- ing the Ellsberg break-in-and that they had obtained some assistance in their cloak-and-daggering from the CIA. That information was potentially more damaging to Mr. Nixon's re-election cam- paign than Watergate itself. And al- though the indictment did not mention it, Liddy's revelation was presumably what prompted Mitchell and Mardian to tell Dean that the CIA might provide. covert funds to the Watergate burglars. Mitchell himself admitted at the Water- gate hearing that it was because of the meeting in LaRue's apartment that he learned "early on of Liddy's involvement with Watergate and what he called "the White House horrors." Unfortunately for him, however, Mitchell bad denied knowing of Liddy's confession during an earlier appearance before the Watergate grand jury-"and the jury cited him for false declaration on that score, too. In any event, the indictment charged that Dean subsequently met with Elir- liehman on the matter and that Ehrlich- marl "approved a suggestion" that Dean /ask CIA deputy director Vernon Walters if the agency could lend a hand-paying . the bail and salaries of the Watergate crew. Just who suggested contacting General Walters, a long-time friend of President Nixon? The indictment didn't say. Nor did it mention the parallel ef- forts-testified to before the Senate com- mittee-to have Walters suggest the possibility that the CIA was involved in Watergate, and thus to hamper the ini- tial FBI investigations into the break-in. The indictment did say that Mitchell, sometime in mid-July, advised Dean to obtain FBI reports on the investigation for CRP lawyer Parkinson and others. And it alleged that on July 21, Mardian met with Dean at the White House to re- view some of those FBI reports. This Department aide, was working for the. CRP when he reviewed the confidential; FBI reports. There was no mention, however, of the embarrassing political files from Howard hunt's " safe that were turned over se- cretly to FBI acting direc- tor L. Patrick Gray III- and later destroyed by him, according to Gray's own testimony before the Senate committee. STA1 The Story of the Big Cover-Up THE EARLY PAYOFFS When the CIA refused to take responsibility for the Watergate gang, the Nixon men were thrown back on their own not-in- considerable financial re- sources. On June 28, the indictment charged, Ehr- lichman and Dean met at the White House and Ehr- lichman approved the use of California lawyer Iler- bert Kalmbach-the President's personal attorney and money handler-to raise cash to make "covert payments to and for the benefit of persons involved in the Watergate break-in." Keeping the payments covert was a complicated problem. On July 6, the in- dictment said, CRP lawyer Parkinson met in Washington with attorney Wil- liam O. Bittman, representing Ilunt, and passed a cryptic message: "Rivers is OK to talk to." Rivers, it turned out, was the code name for ex-cop Anthony Ulase- wicz in his role as the bearer of cash. The next day, according to the indict- ment, Ulasewicz delivered $25,000 in cash to Bittman and ten clays later made drop-offs of $40,000 to Mrs. Iloward Aunt and $8,000 to Liddy. Ulasewicz was a virtuoso at the art of clandestine payoffs, generally hiding the money in some public place and watching from the sidelines to make sure it was retrieved by its intended recipi- ent. In Liddy's case, according to Ulase- wicz's own testimony at the Watergate hearings, he placed the money in a locker at Washington National Airport and left the locker key for Liddy in an envelope on. a nearby window ledge. There were some prob- lems, of course, most nota- bly Kalmbach's growing doubts about the propriety of the back-door funding scheme. One of the overt acts listed by the indict- ment in support of its pri- mary conspiracy charge was a July 26 White house meeting at which Ehrlichinan allegedly told Kalmbach that he had to continue raising the funds excerpted) ance before the mittee last July: "I was beginning to have concern about this assignment," he said then. "And I wanted ... and I said, `John, I want you to tell me'-and you know, I can remember it very vividly because I looked at him and I said, `John, I am looking right into your eyes. I know Jeanne [Mrs. Eln?lichman] and your fam- ily. You know Barbara [\irs. Kalmbach] and my family. You know that my family and my reputation mean everything to me, and it is just absolutely necessary, Jolm, that you tell me, first that John Dean has the authority to direct inc in this assignment, that it is a proper assign- ment, and that I am to go forward on it'." "And did he look you in the eyes?" asked Sam Dash, the committee's chief counsel. "Yes; he did," said Kalmbach. "What did he say to you?" asked Dash. "Ile said, `Herb, John Dean does have the authority, it is proper, and you are to go forward'." In mid-October, the indictment indi- cates, Fred LaRue took charge of the ? secret payments-but not before Ulase- wicz, working under Kalrnbach's direc- tion, made at least three other drop-offs of cash totaling more than $114,000. may be a key element in the nand jury's o k ? such fund-raisin charge that an effc~PPrQ; ftlmrMflease 2005/07/01n 61A sue , nQ0~Q 000700090048-3 Watergate investigation was under way. lately secret. Kalmbach Mardian, though formerly a top justice recalled the scene dra-