REVISED CAMS P/S BUDGET PLAN AND RELEASE OPTIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 28, 2013
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 5, 1988
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8.pdf87.56 KB
Body: 
STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/28: sCIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8 v eNext 2 Page(s) In Document Denied Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/28: CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/28: CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8 25^1 t` 7 ..-4L is DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE Committee on Imagery Requirements and Exploitation Washington, DC 20505 , 5 May 1987 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Edward J. Maloney Director, Office of Information Technology 25X1 SUBJECT: Revised CAMS P/S Budget Plan and Release Options 1. The CAMS P/S Program Office recently presented COMIREX with a revised CAMS P/S budget plan for fiscal years 1987, 1988, and 1989 reflecting net shortfalls of $2,334K, $3,052K, and $1,197K respectively. We were informed that the baseline program was unable to accommodate these funding reductions without reducing scheduled deliverables. Included as part of the plan were four options for scheduling future CAMS releases. It was agreed by all that Options 2 and 3 were not acceptable, thus leaving us with basically two 25X1 choices. 25X1 25X1 25X1 2. Looking at these two options from a COMIREX perspective, Option 1 has several significant shortcomings. They include the following: o It reduces Release 13 to inrludp only and reserved identifiers tacking It reduces TRW personnel to an unacceptable level beginning in mid-1989, thus causing significant staffin roblems which does not 25X1 bode well for CAMS in the early 1990's. 3. Option 4, with one exception, is the one most favored by COMIREX. Its principal features are the following: 25X1 ET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/28: CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8 tkr'ek..ire4 25 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/28: CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8 },?.A. ? 25X1 25X1 ? SUBJECT: Revised CAMS P/S Budget Plan and Release Options o It provides a better phase-down in TRW staffing. The one disadvantage to Option 4 is that it withdraws $100K and $200K from COMIREX allocated funds for FY 1988 and FY 1989 respectively. These funds are specifically included in the CIAP budget by Congressional direction for exclusive COMIREX use and are not to be considered as part of the CAMS 25X1 development effort. 4. I believe we must protect the CIAP funds allocated to COMIREX. These funds are critical to COMIREX planning activities relative to CAMS for the 25X1 90's development. OIT's proposed reductions represent percent of nur tntal FY 1988 and FY 1989 funds respectvely, wnereas tney 25X1 represent percent of the CAMS development budget. I also believe that we must continue Wfully support development and maintenance of the current CAMS. Therefore4-q request_that_you direct the CAMS?PTSWWWE Office toproceed with Option 4 the the proviWthat?they?n-WYbilai7thb GOMIREX allocation-but-rather that they find-an alternative?source-foilidse cslio'rtfalls. ?es a last resort, I would prefer to eliminate planned 25X1 ifiiiibilities before giving up COMIREX allocated funds. If this i7ecessary, we will discuss what must be eliminated with the Program Office. 25X1 25X1 5. Please advise me of your actions on this issue.) ..C4tET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/08/28: CIA-RDP91B00060R000100270008-8