NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

PERSONNEL EVALUATION BOARD (PEB)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP91B01306R001300020001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 31, 2013
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 2, 1989
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP91B01306R001300020001-5.pdf67.95 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/10/31 : CIA-RDP91B01306R001300020001-5 ER 3991-89 2 October 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR: General Counsel FROM: Deputy Director for Planning and Coordination SUBJECT: Personnel Evaluation Board (PEB) 1. During my service on the PEB for over two years, I developed both a great respect for the process and a concern that too few of the lessons learned' are brought to bear in management training and employee development. Further,- I am struck by the notion that most PEB cases are brought because corporate equities are involved, rather than narrow concerns about poor performance, etc. 2. I have raised informally with the Executive Committee members the notion that the PEB be reconfigured and that its 'chain of command" be revised. The lower level Employee Review Panel might remain as presently constituted, but the PEB would have a voting member from each Directorate to share formally in the interpretation of Agency policy, regulations, and precedent. (The current PEB members might remain as "members," or might become the senior staff present to advise a Board of only directorate representatives.) The Chairmanship of the Board would be the Deputy Director for Planning and Coordination, in order to represent the PEB as a corporate body. (Chairmanship by the D/OP with D/OMS, D/OS, DC/CIC, D/EEO, GC, etc., as members makes the process look more like a DDA technical review, even though the head of a career service ultimately must sign off on recommended action.) All portions classified CONFIDENTIAL CL BY Signer DECL OADR S-CLara-I-13-ettrirr- Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/10/31 : CIA-RDP91B01306R001300020001-5 Declassified in Part- Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/10/31 : CIA-RDP91B01306R001300020001-5 CONFIDENTIAL SUBJECT: Personnel Evaluation Board (PEB) 3. Is there anything in the above notion that is prohibited by regulation? Would there be any abridgement of due process? Any confusion of command authority or of right of appeal? I'd appreciate your views. Distribution: 1 - Executive Registry 1 - DDP&C Chron DDP&C:GFoster:es:10/4/89 t. ? ? Gary t. F.4sker-- CONFIDENTIAL Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/10/31 : CIA-RDP91B01306R001300020001-5 25X1 25X1