POSSIBLE MEDIA DISCLOSURE OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP92B00478R000800010003-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 13, 2013
Sequence Number: 
3
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 18, 1985
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP92B00478R000800010003-0.pdf74.41 KB
Body: 
25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/13: CIA-RDP92B00478R000800010003-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/13: CIA-RDP92B00478R000800010003-0 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/13: CIA-RDP92B00478R000800010003-0 ? -Errant Soviet missile fired from submarine autlioritita ye Jane's Weapoos Sys- ten is. The 55-N?3 missile is carried by three older I ypi:s ot SIvie subma- rines. code-named the Whiskey Long-bin. the Juliet!. and Echo II 7_ ziaisf gC class. Analysts are not certain By Roger Fontaine n?E WASH,NG TON TIMES The Soviet cruise missile that violated Norwegian and Finnish airspace 10 days ago was launched from a submarine and designed to simulate an incoming U.S. cruise missile, according to U.S. intelli- gence sources. It was to serve as a target for local naval forces on exercises in the Barents Sea, the sources said. But the missile, an obsolescent SS-N-3 and an older version of the cruise missile currently caeried by submarines and cruisers, was not shot down as planned, and it headed in the wrong direction. Moreover, according to these same sources, the naval exercise commandereallaTcii-nfOW-ri Soviet air defense,LinctuTdrrig-tmissile-gai ,airEl'aff i'lirs-1/ of the errant-cruisej missi ruled /but y Moscow to the o leers 'responsible for the incident- -`U:S:iiTfelligence also reports that there is no evidence of the missile. NATO code-named Shaddock, being armed with a nuclear war- head. The Shaddock, however, can carry a warhead with a yield of 350 kilotons, according to the MISSILES From page IA flo-F20 minutes and reached a maxi- mum altitude ot- 4,0033- meters (a lit:- tie-more than two miles), indicating the missile was not following its designed capability of closely hug- ging the ground to escape radar detection - a leading characteris- tic of cruise missiles. If it did land in Finland's Lake [nail, then the Soviet rocket reached its maximum range of some 250 miles. U.S. intelligence also believes the Shaddock was not a "classic drone," as depicted in the Soviet apology issued Friday, although it was meant to be a target missile. While the Soviets expressed regrets, reflecting their desire to downplay the affair on the eve of the opening of arms-control talks, they referred to the SS-N-3 to as "winged target " and not a missile. Moreover, they did not confirm that the flight violated Norwegian and Finnish air space. The Shaddock is the largest of the Soviet cruise missiles and has been in service, according to Jane's, for approximately a decade. It has been steadily modified, and can be launched from submarine or surface ships. American intelligence, which tracked the missile's path over the Kola peninsula and then Norway and finally Finland, is still not sure . what went wrong. wlitilier the stray Soviet missile ?i'As fired from a submerged vessel or from the surface. U:Sr-tritelgena-analysts-also--- believe the incident indicates the ?Continued low state of readiness Of 'Soviet air defense - a probleni (exposed-by-two-earlier-intrusions7 of-SoViet airspace by Korean isj? airliners in 1978 and 1983. '11-2,y also believe the incid-ent demon-L Strates that. Soviet air defense.is unala.le-to-react-to-unexpected sit U.S. intelligence also indicates that-the-en-Use missile was in the-air-r --- see MISSILES page 8A Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/13: CIA-RDP92B00478R000800010003-0