CRISIS POSTPONED?

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP92B00478R000800030015-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 16, 2014
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 29, 1981
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP92B00478R000800030015-5.pdf67.11 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/01/16: CIA-RDP92B00478R000800030015-5 . ?.? ARTICLE .013EARED ON PAG2' 7y4 Russian oil 1 Crisis postponed? newroose America's Central Intelligence Agency has revised its estimates of Soviet oil output. It now thinks that Russia is not ? about to become a big oil importer after all. Four years ago, a CIA study predict- ed that Russia's oil production would fall sharply after 1980 and that it could be importing as much as 3.5m-4.5m barreb a day by 1985. Now it says that the Soviet Union might still be exporting oil in the mid-1980s. The agency claims its revision is not as: vectacular as it looks, but the difference* THE ECONOMIST 23-29 MAY 1981 is clearly an embarrassment. True, its 1977 forecast that Soviet output could decline to as little as 8m b/d by 1985 was almost immediately revised upwards. Western oil specialists never took .the CIA's original forecast too seriously. Yet, only a year ago, the then CIA director. Admiral Stansfield Turner, was still telling senators that Soviet military action to secure new energy supplies could not be ruled out. The spectre of an oil-hungry Russia anxious to grab Gulf oil? was a strong theme in some of the Rea- gan team's foreign policy planning. -. The CIA's 20% upward revision means that it is now estimating Russian produc- tion at 10m b/d by 1985, and maybe as high as 11.m b/d. Output is now running at just over 12m b/d-2,1% above last year's total. So the CIA is itill projecting a fall in the immediate future but it is less alarmist than before shim the conse- quence,. It says Russia is switching to alternative fuels (especially coal, nuclear -power and natural gas) and showing a new interest in conservation. Around 25% of today's 12m b/d of Russian a is exported?half to its east European allies, half to the west and India. The east Europeans in Comecon have bean told that their oil supplies will stay stuck at 1980 levels (The Economist, May 9th, 1981). The west could live with a cut in Soviet exports, but Russia needs the hard currency and would prefer to cut its do 'c ump ' n and exports t Comecon. ? - The CIA still has a low opon of Russian conservation efforts. It believes that the Soviet Union is at least 40% less efficient in its use of energy than the west, and that Russian planners and man- agers have little incentive to save oil. They may have an incentive soon. Do- mestic wholesale oil prices in Russia, which have been frozen since 1967, will rise by 230% early next year. That could, have an effect, even on Russia's non- market economy. If domestic demand is held down more effectively than the CIA expects, there will be more Russian oil to spare for export. Some American specialists (and the state department) also think that the CIA's urn b/d top output estimate for 1985 is still too niggardly. The latest Soviet five-year plan projects almost 13m b/d by 1985, which would be possible wit* western technology to improve drilling and recovery techniques. Development I of Russia's huge natural gas reserves could provide the hard currency needed to buy that technology, and hasten the switch away from excessive domestic use of oil. That is why the proposed pipeline Raking a Siberian natural gas field with western Europe is so important to Russia. Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/01/16: CIA-RDP92B00478R000800030015-5