(UNTITLED)

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP92B01090R002600120015-1
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: C
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: December 9, 2016
• Document Release Date: August 25, 2000
• Sequence Number: 15
• Content Type: FORM

A~~'g~~l~~lea~ 2
CONFIDENTIAL
d~~~: ~i~$9~~~09~~26i0(~~15-1
CIA REQUEST FOR EVALUATION BY
EVALUATING AGENCY
DISSEM. NUMBER
DATE OF DISTRIB.
FIELD NUMBER
Chief Country
Subject
EVALUATOR: Please complete this valuation within _ days of receipt of request. Need for completion within this
time is priority/standard. Indicate choices by ^X.^ If item marked i:> printed in italics, please explain under
~~Evaluator+s Comments." Normally, put one X in each appropriate section. Otherwise, please cover each of these
aspects in your comments. For further NOTES on use of this form, see reverse.
SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT IS OF:
COLLECTOR'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS
1. Major
2. MODERATE
1 IMPORTANCE IN
}
3. LITTLE
RELATION TO
J
OUR NEEDS.
4. NO
INFORMATION IN THIS REPORT:
CONTRIBUTES TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE SUBJECT:
1. SIGNIFICANTLY
2. MODERATELY
3. NEGLIGIBLY
CC
URACY
.
A
t. SUBSTANTIALLY TRUE
EVALUATOR'S COMMENTS AND FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS
2. CREDIBLE
3. Doubtful
4. False
5. CANNOT BE JUDGED. SEE D.
RELATION TO OTHER INFORMATION.
t. USEFUL FOR CONFIRMATION
Z? USEFUL FOR NEW INFORMATION
3. Sufficiently known
4. AT PRESENT WE LACK OTHER INFORMATION
TO JUDGE ACCURACY OR USEFULNESS
5. Conflicts with previous information
6. Appears to 6e fabrication
USEFULNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN GREATER WITH:
t. More detail
2. Less detail, more summary
3. Less fragmentary approach
4. Better organization
5. Better observation or better exploi-
tation of source, or both.
6? (STATED IN COMMENT)
7. NO DEFECT AFFECTING USEFULNESS.
REQUIREMENTS
(ONLY IF YOUR REQUIREMENT IS CtTED.) REPORT
SATISFIES IT:
' -
t. FULLY. REQUIREMENT CAN BE CLOSED.
2. partially. Portion of requirement
may be closed.
3. PARTIALLY. BUT NEED CONTINUES.
~4. NEGLIGIBLY
DEGREE TO WHICH OTHER (NON-CS) REPORTING
PROVIDES ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ON SUBJECT:
1. FULLY
2. SUBSTANTIALLY
3. LITTLE
4. NONE
(IF IN G YOU CHECKED ?LITTLE? OR ~~NONE.~~ AND
IF YOU HAVE FILED NO REQUIREMENT.)
1. WE WILL PRESENT A REQUIREMENT WITH-
IN 30 DAYS.
2. OUR NEED DOES NOT WARRANT A REQUIRE?
MENT FOR CS REPORTING.
EVALUATOR
NAME (Please print)
COMPONENT
PHONE
BATE REQUEST RECEIVED
DATE EVALUATION FORWARDED
;oR59 3g P~~oved For Release 2001/03/07: Q1~I~D~H~~01090R002600120015-1 ~ZQ)
 CONFIDENTIAL
App VV~~~~JJ Fgr Rele~,e 2001/03/07 :CIA-RDP92B01(R00260012001 ~-1
~~OLLEC.C R/EVAL' OR.: RECLASSIFY ACCORDING TO D. ,ADDED ON FRONT'
NOTES TO EVALUATOR
)iIXPERIPIIENT. This is an experimental form, intended to obtain your guidance with min-
imum effort on your part and with maximum speed.. If you see a way to serve these
ends better please describe it, either in the comments section. or on an ati;ached
sheet,
IIIRPOSh. This evaluation request is part of a determined effort to concentrate col-
lection anal. reporting on what is most valuable to you. Because you are the best
judge of value to you, your cooperation is essential.
SPEED. The sooner your guidance gets to those who need it, the sooner it can influence
what-you receive. So please do the job promptly -- if possible as soon as you have
read the report. (See also "CLASSIFICATION . . ." and ". . . EVALTJATOR'S COnlmRENI'S.")
CLASSIFICATION AVI) CONTROLS. Flease classify ,your evaluation independently of the
classification of the :report. If the report comes from a foreign liaison service and
if you think part of your comment should not be passed back to that service, please
indicate the port ion that should be withheld.
FRANKNF~SS. We invite candid criticism, particularly when it is constructive. At
stake Yiere are national_ intelligence needs, taxpayers' money, and a co7_lection mech-
anism vrith limited resources. None of these interests is served by too much concern
with politeness or too little concern with faults.
ITALICS. On items printed in italics, an "X" by itself is very nearly useless; when-
ever possible, some explanation should be given, If you are in doubt as to vrhat to
comment. upon, the following notes should help. Please tag each comment tivith the: let-
ter of the topic.,
A. If the s~ibject is of greater interest to another component of your department
or officf:, please refer this request there. If ,you rate the subjeci; of major
importance, please indicate whether the importance is temporary (t,o meet a.
deadline or complete a study) or continuing (because of relevance to major
departmental or national intelligence needs), and briefly explain the nature
of the need. If the subject of the report as stated does not clearly delin-
eate the subject you have in mind, please restate the subject as you see it.
C. If you consider the information doubtful or false, please briefly state basis
for your opinion, unless "X" and comment on one of the last two items in D
adequately stakes the. case.
D. Sufficiently known. If you can fairly easily say whether previous reports
were by Foreign. Service/Army/Navy/Air/other components of this Agency/ilSpress/
foreign press, please do so.
Conflicts. If this information conflicts with other information, please in-
dicate nature c>f conflict, and, if possible, give origin of previous informa-
t ion.
Appears to be fabrication. Please explain.
E. More detail/less detail/fragmentary. Please suggest the type of information
that should have been omitted or included.
Better observation or exploitation. Please briefly explain basis for your
If report; partially satisfies your requirement, please identify the part, so
that effort can be redirected. to do you more good.
H. The post-audit provided by candid evaluations, while most useful for current
guidance, is less effective for planning. In planning for the PURPOSE stated
above, we need requirements, not only for spot queries or gaps, but for major
continuing needa. In view of intensified efforts to reduce marginal reporting,
the anal?y~st should not assume ,that his unstated needs will- be r.eco~?:nized and
that reporting to which he has become accustomed will continue indefinitely.
If you have a priority need for information that is obtainable only by clan-
destine means, present a requirement for it.
COLIFC`TOR' S COn~]11F,NTS .AND QUESTIONS; EVALUATOR' S CON?MENI'S AND FOLLOW-iJF QUESTIONS.
=n addition to an "X" in each appropriate section, exp anation of your use of itali-
cized items, and. ansvrers to "Collector's Questions," if any, we shall welcome com-
ments on the substance of the report. In the interest of conserving your time, how-
ever, it may be well to remember that this evaluation will go not to a:E'ellow analyst
but to specialized collectors who need your guidance in collecting what -- and only
vrhat -- you most need.
,',=f you need more space, use p]_ain paper and staple it to this sheet.
Approved For Release 2001/03/07 :CIA-RDP92B01090R002600120015-1
CONFIDENTIAL