ACCESSIBILITY OF AGENCY FACILITIES TO EMPLOYEES WITH DISABILITIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 3, 2013
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 11, 1989
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4.pdf148.23 KB
Body: 
? A LN Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/03: CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4 ? ? ? NESOSTRY VOLE: XS ROUTING ANIOIECORIYSHEET------ SUBJECT: (Optional) FROM: STAT R. E. Hineman DDS&T 6E60 Hqs EXTENSION NO. DATE DS&T -372-89 11 May 1989 TO: (Officer designation. room number, and building) 1. DDA 1 EXA 7D24 Hqs DATE RECEIVED V61? 1?.? FORWARDED OFFICER'S INITIALS COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom to whom. Draw a lin* ocross column after each comment.) 2. A-bber rtro? '6* 3. AIMA R) 4 s. EXA Pr7 6. Re51 .198s 7. 8. 9. STAT 10. 11. STATI 2. 13. 14. 15. I 01.._ qta a/at:04 STAT pitUtrift.di kt-Atit a-v.. 6,e taut OL wzo.. 4?-rwl` 4244244,A 14:4 ,140,tz avAii 1,0_e AL64.eiL etearol .aeaz_z.d 414cc:442 A641 lye lig_ pv_s-d f The tiiite) hits 7 el/td e a t4( Stoitgetiz_. E60 5122ii? FORM 61014TUUS * US. Government PrIpUne Office. 19113-4114-634,411156 cl.t/ 1-79 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/03: CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/03: CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4 DS&T 372-89 11 MAY 1989 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Administration FROM: SUBJECT: 25X1 R. E. Hineman Deputy Director for Science and Technology Accessibility of Agency Facilities to Employees With Disabilities 1. The DS&T Minority Career Development Panel has brought to my attention a number of areas where the Agency appears not to be in compliance with the Architectural Barriers Act, regarding accessibility of Government buildings to the disabled, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, governing reasonable acCommodation in the workplace. I believe that by failing to comply with these regulations, we are failing to meet our responsibilities to our disabled employees and acting contrary to the goals we articulated in the 5-Year Affirmative Action Plan. 2. First, the Panel has pointed out a number of problems involving accessibility to the Headquarters auditorium. The Agency auditorium is accessible to wheelchair users only via the graded walkway from the northeast entrance of the original Headquarters building. This route is not protected from the weather and can be treacherous when it is wet or icy. The auditorium stage is not accessible to those unable to climb the steps, a situation that has barred our disabled employees and guests from appearing before large gatherings, including promotion and award ceremonies and special assemblies. The Agency had to withdraw its invitation to EEOC Commissioner Evans Kemp last year to speak at the program marking Disability Awareness Month when it learned by chance that he uses a wheelchair. Commissioner Kemp was unwilling to access the stage via a portable ramp procured by the Office of Logistics, because the ramp's elevation raised safety concerns. Restrooms in the auditorium are located at the foot of a stairwell and are not equipped for use by the disabled. This means that a wheelchair user must exit the auditorium and return to the original Headquarters building via the northeast entrance to use properly equipped and accessible facilities. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/03: CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/03: CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4 SUBJECT: Accessibility of Agency Facilities to Employees With Disabilities 3. The problems at the outbuildings appear to be similar. Architectural barriers effectively bar our disabled employees from many 25X1 Agency offices. The second floor of Building is off-limits to wheelchair users, because the buildin has no elevator. Wheelchair users 25X1 can reach the second floor of Building only if they are willing 25X1 suffer the indignity of using the freight elevator. At 25X1 there are steps into most of the buildings containing classrooms, and some of the multi-story buildings have no elevator. to 4. Finally, the Panel has raised the issue of reasonable accommodation in the workplace. EEOC regulations define "reasonable accommodation" as including "acquisition or modification of equipment or devices." I do not believe that an Agency of this size could be viewed as "reasonably accommodating" when it does not have a vehicle with a wheelchair lift. 'Procurement of such a vehicle would enable our wheelchair users to travel between Agency buildings on government business, just as their colleagues do on the Agency shuttle. The current arrangement whereby employees need a week's notice to schedule transportation through a commercial firm just doesn't work. 5. I realize that cost will be a factor in addressing these issues. A small van with a wheelchair lift may cost S20,000, and architectural modifications will cost many times more. However, I recommend that we find ways to solve some of these problems, thereby reaffirming our commitment to the principles of EEO. R. E. Hineman 2 CONFIDENTIAL STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/12/03: CIA-RDP92G00017R000700320002-4 -