REP. SHUSTER (SANITIZED)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
5
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 2, 2014
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 12, 1989
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3.pdf278.98 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 ILLEGIB STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT STAT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 11-220 - Representatives and Staffs Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03 : CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 ? I. Bud Shuster R?Pennsylvania, 9th District Began Service: 1973 2268 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515-3809 (202) 225-2431 BIOGRAPHICAL Born: 1/23/32 ? Home: Everett ? Educ.: B.S., U. of Pittsburgh; M.B.A., Duquesne U.; Ph. D., American U. ? Prof.: Computer Co. Exec.; Author ? Rel.: Protestant KEY STAFF AIDES Name/Position Legislative Responsibility Ann Eppard Admin. Asst. Karen Schecter Press Asst. Carol McKissick Office Mgr. Scott Lowry Legis. Asst. Charlotte Herbert Appts. Secy. COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS 1. Public Works and Transportation: Surface Transportation, Ranking Minority Member ? Aviation ? Investigations and Over- sight Intelligence (Select): Legislation ? Oversight and Evaluation OTHER POSITIONS House Republican Study Committee ? Congressional Rural Caucus ? Congressional Steel Caucus ? Congressional Travel and Tourism Caucus ? Congressional Truck Caucus, Co-Chairman ? Commission on the U.S. House of Representa- tives Bicentenary ? Chowder and Marching Society DISTRICT OFFICES RD 2, Box 711 Altoona, PA 16601 (814) 946-1653 179 E. Queen St. Chambersburg, PA 17201 (717) 264-8308 Spring 1988 Congressim npriassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 1 image among Democrats: he was running as an avowed partisan for GOP whip. His opponent. Trent Lott of Mississippi. was virtually his opposite in style: friendly, easygoing and non- controversial. Shuster campaigned for the job for a year with all his customary single-minded- ness, carefully cultivating each member. Starting as a distinct underdog, he gradu- ally gained on Lott, but not quite enough. The final score in January of 1981 was Lott 96. Shuster 90. Some Republicans felt that the same drive and intensity that brought Shuster so close ultimately defeated him, because it raised the fear that he would be less than sympathetic to their personal needs. At Home: Democrats find Shuster diffi- cult to love, but they also find him impossible to beat. His district has firm Republican loyal- ties, and his outspoken partisanship on the floor strikes a chord among constituents. While he has had detractors in local political circles, notably in the GOP organization of the 9th's most populous county. Blair (Altoona). he re- mains untouchable at the polls. In 1984. he had an interesting, though unsuccessful, Democratic challenger in 62-year- old Nancy Kulp, who played "Miss Jane Hath- Pennsylvania - 9th District away- oil "The Beverly Hillbillies- televkion comedy. Retired from show business and living on a Pennsylvania farm, Kulp decided to chal- lenge Shuster when it looked as if he would win unopposed. She accused Shuster of voting down the line with Reagan and ignoring the needs of farmers, veterans and elderly constitu- ents. Unaccustomed to aggressive challenges. Shuster counterattacked vigorously, launching a heavy advertising campaign and at one point saying of Kulp, "She's an outstanding come- dian. I grew up watching her." The media found Kulp's background and candidacy in- triguing, hut the voters did not seem interested. Shuster won re-election with two-thirds of the vote. Before entering politics. Shuster had a successful business career with the Radio Corporation of America and as an independent electronics entrepreneur. When Republican Rep. .1. Irving Whalley announced his retire- ment in 1972. Shuster embarked on a self- generated congressional campaign and won the Republican primary over state Sen. D. Elmer Hawbaker. Hawbaker was backed by the party committees of Bedford and Blair counties. Committee Public Works and Transportation (2nd of 20 Republicans) Surface Transportation (ranking). Aviation; Investigations and Oversight. Select Intelligence (6th of 6 Republicans) Legislation; Oversight and Evaluation. Elections 1986 General Bud Shuster (R) 1984 General Bud Shuster (R) Nancy Kulp (D) 120,890 1100%) 118,437 (67%) 59,549 (33%) Previous Winning Percentages: 1982 (65%) 1980 (100%) 1978 ( 75%) 1976 (100%) 1974 ( 57%) 1972 ( 62%) District Vote For President 1984 1980 D 59,047 (33%) D 59.422 R 118,500 (67%) R 101,766 I 7,245 1986 Shuster (R) 1984 Shuster (R) Kulp (D) 1976 (35%) D 71,159 (42%) (60W R 94,421 (56%) ( 4% ) Campaign Finance Receipts Expend- Receipts from PACs itures $299,910 $450,849 $85.891 8152,002 (51%) $276,463 $183,284 (41%) $498,954 $34.276 (40%) $85.848 Voting Studies Presidential Party Support Unity Conservative Coalition Year S 0 S 0 ? S 0 1986 77 22 85 11 90 8 1985 66 34 86 10 87 11 1984 63 37 83 15 90 8 1983 71 21 85 5 90 8 1982 56 23 60 13 60 18 1981 76 22 89 11 99 1 S = Support 0 = Opposition Key Votes Produce MX missiles (1985) Cut federal subsidy for water projects (1985) Weaken oun control laws (1986) Cut back public housing construction (1986) Aid Nicaraguan contras (1986) Impose textile import limits over Reagan veto (1986) Block chemical weapons production (1986) Impose South African sanctions over Reagan veto (1986) Interest Group Ratings Year ADA ACU AFL-CIO CCUS 1986 5 90 29 94 1985 10 81 24 8. 1984 0 83 31 5: 1983 0 91 0 8 1982 20 80 29 9 1981 0 100 20 8' 130 ? Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 Bud Shuster, R-Pa. Pennsylvania 9 To Pennsylvania Turnpike travelers, this district, which crosses the Allegheny Mountains. is a series of tunnels, long climbs and sharp descents. To Republicans, it is a predictable source of votes. This central Pennsylvania region long has been a passageway to the West and, other than farming. transportation has been its central focus. Before the coming of the railroad, trade and travel had to take the long ?vay around the mountains, ducking south. The city of Altoona. in Blair County, prospered as a rail center. With the decline of the rail system, a new travel-related culture sprung up along the turnpike, the nation's first superhigh- way, which opened in 1940. Its epitome is Breezewood, the celebrated "Town of Mo- tels" ? by night, a garish glow of neon signs amid the mysterious mountain darkness. For the most part. the 9th is a series of small villages scattered among the moon- South Central ? Altoona tains. It has little industry; its farmers raise cattle for beef and milk. The isolation and agricultural character of the area have bred a strong strain of conservatism. Local Re- publicans there like to boast that much of the area within the 9th District has gone Republican since 1860. Altoona. which lost 10 percent of its population in the 1970s, used to be a Demo- cratic stronghold. Developed by the Penn- sylvania Railroad, it has the giant Samuel Rea Railroad Shops; just to the west of it. the tracks form the famous Horseshoe Curve, an engineering marvel. But many of the railroad workers who voted Democratic lost their jobs and left. Nowadays. Republi- cans win Blair; Reagan took it by almost 2- to-1 in 1984. Population: 515.430. White 508.728 (99%). Black 4,727 (1%). Spanish origin 1,841 (0.4%). 18 and over 368.331(71%), 65 and over 64,934 (13%; Median age. 31. onstration projects, and a companion measure that allowed states to raise the speed limit to 65 on rural Interstates. The House easily overrode Reagan's veto; the Senate, after first sustaining the veto, later voted to override Reagan, enact- ing the bill into law. One of the issues on which the House and Senate were at odds was a Shuster provision banning the use of imported cement in federal highway projects, and increasing from 50 to 85 percent the proportion of domestic products that must he used to manufacture mass transit buses and rail cars. Shuster has been active in supporting "Buy American- language to bills to promote C.S.-made products over imports. Earlier in his career on Public Works, Shuster and Howard negotiated a compromise that led to enactment of a trucking deregula- tion bill to ease restrictions on entry into the trucking business. Shuster has argued vociferously against air bags as a safety requirement for automobiles and worked to prevent air bag regulations from going into effect. He has also fought require- ments that buses and subways be fitted with new equipment making them accessible to handicapped people in wheelchairs. Shuster's alliance with Howard and the Democrats against the Reagan administration 1304 in the recent highway dispute is a symbol of his evolution from an earlier role as partisan "hatchet man- who made a habit of blasting the Democratic majority almost daily on the House floor. From the day he arrived in Washington. Shuster began focusing his ambitions on a Republican leadership post. He was president of his 1972 Republican House class. and after three terms he decided to move for the chair- manship of the Republican Policy Committee. The front-runner for that _job. Nlinnesota's Bill Frenzel, all but assumed it was his and did little to win. Shuster simply outcampaigned hint and won it. 80-55. Shuster immediately turned the policy committee into a sophisticated media opera? tion, issuing releases on dozens of major issues and holding news conferences in the House Press Gallery to lacerate the Democratic major- ity. He also began firing a verbal barrage at the Democrats nearly every day on the floor, launching a brief filibuster to protest changes in the schedule, and bringing a toy duck on the floor to complain about a "lame-duck- session. By mid-1980, Budget Chairman Robert N. Giaimo was calling him "the hatchet man of the Republican Party." But Shuster was not concerned about his Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3 9 Bud Shuster (R) Of Everett ? Elected 1972 Born: Jan. 23, 1932. Glassport, Pa. Education: U. of Pittsburgh. B.S. 1954: Duquesne U.. M.B.A. 1960; American U., Ph.D. 1967. Military Career Army, 1954-56. Occupation: Corporate executive. Family: Wife, Patricia Rommel; five children. Religion: United Church of Christ. Political Career No previous office. Capitol Office: 2268 Rayburn Bldg. 20515; 225-2431. In Washington: There has long been a dual quality to Shuster's House career ? the angry man who could deliver strident ha- rangues against Democrats on the House floor managed to work effectively with the same Democratic majority on the Public Works Committee. But more recently, as Shuster's party leadership ambitions have faded, the conflict has faded as well. Nowadays. Shuster is first and foremost an important player in the process of writing multibillion-dollar highway ato in Throughout his years in Congress, Shuster has been an ally of road builders and other highway users and a defender of the Highway Trust Fund against attempts to use its money for non-highway purposes. For years, he has warned that the country's roads are deteriorat- ing and need more maintenance funds. He was chairman of the National Transportation Pol- icy Study Committee, an ad hoc group created by Congress. Nowadays, as senior Republican on the Surface Transportation Subcommittee at Pub- lic Works, Shuster makes no pretense about his support for the highway "demonstration proj- ects" that are derided by critics as wasteful pork-barrel spending. In fact, he treats highway projects as an issue of constitutional rights. "It's a congressional prerogative," he says. "We find it absolutely repugnant that an adminis- tration can say that it's all right for a faceless bureaucrat to decide where money should be spent, but it's wrong for a congressman to identify crucial, needed projects." There is no questioning Shuster's effec- tiveness at steering highway money into his district, or the extent to which it is appreciated there. Motorists passing through the little town of Everett. Pa., can avoid congestion by using what is called the "Bud Shuster Byway" ? a brief stretch of four- lane superhighway par. Pennsylvania - 9th District alleling the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Shuster secured federal funding for the road. Shuster has developed such a good working relationship with Public Works Chairman James J. Howard that it used to make people wonder if he realized Howard was a Democrat. In the 97th Congress, as Howard conducted a two-year lobbying campaign to pry support for highway funds out of the Reagan administra- tion. Shuster was right beside him. In the 98th Congress. during the battle over the 1984 highway bill, Shuster joined if Democrats in adding on numerous demonstra- tion projects ? including a $90 million, 12-mile highway widening project for his own district. Shuster never wavered in his loyalty to his ' Democratic chairman, criticizing administra- tion threats to veto the bill. The highway bill was not enacted in 1984, forcing Howard and Shuster to return to it in the 99th Congress. In 1985, Congress cleared legislation simply releasing needed Interstate highway funds, stripping from the bill contro- versial add-ons such as the demonstration projects and mass transit funds. Those provisions were included in a five- year highway and mass transit authorization bill introduced in 1985. By the end of 1986. the massive highway bill had grown to include about 100 special "demonstration" projects at a cost of $1.2 billion over five years. But the Senate refused to accept all those projects, insisting instead that states be allowed to raise the speed limit on Interstate roads to 65 mph ? something House leaders were unwilling to do unless a number of conditions were imposed on states as well. The arguments carried over into the 100th Congress. Early in 1987, despite White House threats of a veto, Congress cleared an 888 billion bill, including $890 million for dem- 1303 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2014/04/03: CIA-RDP92M00732R000300010010-3