CLASSIFICATION REVIEW PROCEDURE REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS BY NARS AND WNRC SUITLAND

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP93B01194R001000240043-8
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 28, 2002
Sequence Number: 
43
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 2, 1979
Content Type: 
REQ
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP93B01194R001000240043-8.pdf125.41 KB
Body: 
Approved For Releas'2002/06/24: CIA-RDP93B01194R001240043-8 2 May 1979 Classification Review Procedure CRP 79-28 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS AT NABS AND WNRC SUITLAND 1. Some inconsistencies have been noted in our review of documents at NABS and 1VNRC. downgrading and referral to h ageic a 1 as declassification itself, our review decision as noted on the worksheet and the to constitutes the final action. hat ac on uld, therefore, include a. Stamping. Even though we plac no stamps on the document reviewed at our own facilities. 2. Most of these inconsistencies occur in the review of our own documents found in other agencies' record groups. Reviewers are reminded that, with the exception that we do not stamp the review action on the document, CIA documents reviewed elsewhere are treated the same as those should write "hold at ropriate class ification)"cfollo)(ed is em- e declassified, the reviewer sh d the worksheet, and add his pnp (2) If th ent may not be declassified, th re sewer (1) If t stamp "declassify" on number and the date. ployee number and date on the worksheet and tab. f the document must be reviewed by a er agency be- cause of deriiati,e material, stamp the worksheet a d t b as follows, CIA IIAS DETERMINED THAT TI DOCUMENT MAY BE DECLASSIF SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY 574 t form must be filled ou'tJ for each b. Form 4023A: A data in i i CIA document reviewed, whether at our own facilities or elsewhere. To neglect this is to make our data base in the automated system incomplete. Refer to RRP 78-23 dated 2 May 1978 for instructions on completion of the form. All entries remain valid except for the reviewer number (notation C), which has been changed and the new job number digraph for NABS or WNRU record groups -- IM, 1 ad of 99 (notation G). STAT Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP93B01194R001000240043-8 Approved For Releas '2002/06/24: CIA-RDP93B01194RO01 W240043-8 c. Weekly statistical sheet: The number of CIA documents re- viewed at NARS or WNRC should be recorded in the upper portion of the statistical sheet. See example attached. 3. When reviewing documents created by other agencies that contain material of interest to CIA, the tab and worksheet should be stamped. to in- dicate that we either have no objection or that the document must be held at a certain level of classification using one of the following stamps: `IH4IS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION THE C.I.A. HAS NO OBJECTION TILT TI CIA HAS DETERMINED MUST BE TO TIIG DECLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFIED AT THE LIM1 -INDICATED THIS DOCUMENT. TS S AU.CHORITY : HR 70-2 N 675/7'7 REVIEWER TE 7STATINTL a. Form 4023A: No data input form will be filled out for docu- ments created by other agencies. b. Weekly statistical sheet: Tabulate other agency documents on the center righthand. portion of statistical sheet (non-CIA with deriva- tive material) per the attached. Chief, Classification Review Group Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP93B01194RO01000240043-8 STATIN1 / ?-' c /l1~f. 1g pproved For Re 6 S # DOCS # PAGES CIA-RDP93BOl 194R001000240043-8 Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP93B01194RO01000240043-8