NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

BRIEFING MATERIALS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP93B01194R001100150015-7
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
11
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 9, 2008
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 17, 1982
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP93B01194R001100150015-7.pdf390.33 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93B01194R001100150015-7 lJ13 04-u,yl 17 FEB 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, Classification Review Division Chief, Information and Privacy Division Chief, Records Management Division Chief, Regulations Control Division Executive Officer, Office of information services SUBJECT: Briefing Materials 1. The Management Staff, DDA, is updating a briefing book containing general information and selected topics for the use of the. DDA. Would you please review the attached information and update where necessary. In addition, the Management Staff, DDA, has asked for any new/additional information or topics which we may want to include. I believe we could include a brief fact sheet outlining the responsibilities of each Division and including your major programs. The intent would be to give the DDA a better feel for just what the Office of Information Services faces in its endeavors and to enable him to explain our programs when called upon to do so. 2. For uniformity, please attempt to adhere to a general format: (a) Responsibilities; (b) Organization (breakdown and numbers of personnel); (c) Current Status (of program) ; and (d) Current and Future Problems. Please limit your submission to not more than two (2) pages. 3. Since we must return our input by 26 February, may I have your submission by not later than 24 February. Attachment: As stated STAT STAT Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93B01194R001100150015-7 Office of the Chief r)rs,agnnted Agency Security Classifica- lion Officer, Agency Declassification Otlicer, Agency Records Management Officer, Agency Archivist. Responsible for liaison with the National Archives and Records Service and Olllce of the Federal Register. Serves as Head of the Ml Career Service: DDA representative to the Public Affairs Advisory Group and Pub- licalions Review Board; Executive Sec- rotary of the Informalion Review Com- nhllee (IRC) ; Chairman of the IRC Working Group; DCI representative on the Interagency Information Security Committee: and Agency's local point for contact with the Information Security Oversight Office. Information and Privacy Division Receives and processes all requests submitted to the Agency under the Freedom of Informalion and Privacy Acts and the mandatory classification review provisions of EO, 12065: as- signs records search and/or review tasks to appropriate Agency compo- nents;. processes appeals on denied re- quests: conducts liaison with other Government agencies regarding the processing of requests; and prepares reports for Congress or other Govern- mental elements as required by law or Executive Order. Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 IL- Classification Review Division Manages the Agency program for sys- tematic classification review under E,O. 12065; establishes systematic classifi- cation review guidelines: develops and implements systematic classification re- view procedures; prepares classification guides in coordination with other Agency components; and maintains liaison with other U.S. Government agencies cqn- cerning systematic review of permanent records over which they or the Agency have classification jurisdiction. Regulations .Control Division Directs and monitors the processing, coordination, and publication of Agency regulatory issuances; works directly with initiators and coordinators of regu- latory issuances to resolve substantive differences; and prepares coordinated regulatory issuances for the DCI, DDA, or DDO approval. Records Management Division Provides for controls over the creation, maintenance, use, and disposition of all Agency records; develops and encour- ages the application of standards, pro- cedures, and techniques designed to improve the management of records; ensures the maintenance and security of records of permanent value; facili. la tes the segregation and disposal of records of temporary value; and is re? sponsibie for the Agency Security Clas- sification Program under E.O. 12065. Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 SUBJECT: SYSTF i- TIC REVIEW FOR DECLASSIFICATION SYNOPSIS: The program of Systematic Review. for Declassification randated by Executive Order-12065 is a disaster. It is not cost effective; it syphons off valuable, scarce resources from CIA's primary mission; and it poses security risks. It should be abolished., The General Accounting Office has also recorr ended its abolition. Section 3-4 of Executive Order 12065 (E.O. 12065) effective 1 December 1978 requires the Executive Branch to institute programs to review all "permanently valuable records" when . they, reach 20 years of age (30 years for foreigZ.govern- sent information) to determine whether the records should remain classified. If they remain classified after such review, they then must be reviewed again. 10 years later, and every 10 years thereafter until declassified, unless a longer period is agreed to by the Director, Information Security Oversight Office (IS00).. Such IS00 exer.Ttions can be difficult to come by. The above requirement is not new. The idea started during the Eisenhower administration and in 1972 President Nixon issued E.O. 11652 which contained a similar declassification review requirement with two major differences: the - initial review was to take place when records reached 30 years of age,.and the time interval for re-review was left to Department Heads. E.O. 12065, recog- nizing that agencies were not geared up to switch from the old 30-year period to the new 20-year requirement overnight, allo:wred agencies 10 years to close the gap. Hence, by 1 December 1988 all permanent records dated 1 December 1,968 and before are to receive an initial review. CURRE`'T STATUS : Our best estimate indicates that we still have approximately 22,000 cubic feet of permanent records that must be reviewed by 1 December 1988 if we are to comply with E.O. 12065. We have 40 people performing the review. Because of the sensitive nature of our records, we must use mostly senior analysts with long years of experience. They are highly trained in their jobs and utilize procedures. designed to maximize their production. In spite of this devotion of resources,, we are able to review on an average only 640.cubic feet per year. Thus, by I December 1988, unless we more than triple our staff, we will accom- plish less than 30 percent of our objective.. Also, in December 1988, as we continue to attack the remaining 70 plus percent, we will have to begin the second review of all material once reviewed and on which the decision was made to continue classification. Since our experience shoes that we continue clas- sification on over 85 percent of the records reviewed, we will have to re-review Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 most of the material we review by Deceirioer 1985. At that time, we will be faced with the first review of records beginning to mature in December 1988. It is an impossible job. C1."RRET PROBLEMS : CIA's program for systematic review of classified material entails the folluaing : 1. Dollar.Costs: We will spend $20 ru.llion by 1988 under our current program anstill. not comply with E.O. 12065 ($80 million if we are to comply) analysts, spend full time, reviewing classified documents order our current sei.up; over 135 people would be required if we are to comply with E.O. 12065. These.people could and should. be used to collect and produce intelligence., 2. Hunan _Resource Costs: Forty.people, mostly valuable, scarce senior 3. Results of Review: On the average, 15 percent of the material reviewed is declassified. .The declassified material that does eventually - reach the public will be of little interest. 4. Security Risks: -.Given our workload and time pressures, there is always the anger o human error resulting in the release of compromising " information. Also, the release of the declassified material adds to the total picture our adversaries have access to. When added to material released under FOIA, books, and leaks, this total picture is awesome and frightful. 5. Chilling Effect on Intelligence Relationships: Because of past Congressional-investigations., FOIA releases, books by former employees, and leaks, many agents and foreign intelligence contacts who would have cooperated in the past no~?: perceive that we are unable to keep their relationship secret- With systematic review for declassification added to the list, we guarantee these folks that if their names haven't come up for review previously,. they - will come up when documents containing their names or identifying data become 20 years old. RECO E JATIGN': It is reco_ruLended that E.O. 12065 be modified to eliminate Section 3-4 or, alternatively, to exesupb CIA from its provisions. The Genera].-Accoun.tinb- Office has concluded after a lengthy investigation that this program should be abolished Government wide. If so, then it is submitted that even more so should it be -abolished with respect to CIA. Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93B01194R001100150015-7 IMPACT OF M:: PROPOSED EXECUTIVE, ORDER The major impact of the proposed Executive order on the work of the Agency would be the elimination of the requirement to conduct a systematic review program for declassification of permanently valuable classified records.as they become twenty years old. This program, required under E.O. 12065, has cost the Agency millions of dollars with little or no benefit. The percentage of documents declassified has been negligible. With the inception of E.O. 12065 in 1978., the Agency was faced with. a ten year backlog of material ready for systematic review and was gilrell tell years to become current. Therefore, by 1988, the Agency should be reviewing material as it becomes twenty years old on a current basis. In spite of the resources expended on the systematic review program, the Agency will not come close to meeting the 1988 goal. Based on the present production rate, the Agency would not even meet fifty percent of its goal by 1988. It is estimated that the costs for the systematic review program would more then double if the goal is to be met. The questions attached are those most likely to be asked by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. The answers to these questions are based on estimates prepared by the managers of the systematic review program. L~'9 crCc c' CJnll] L ag # 1 ~` S p./ 7~ s-r.?-~[ am Y r32~c2 T~r~ ~cw'7I-r-r Su 6 co"- ~.-i~-r7~ ahr 24- F /98 Z. 5'' 17~ s-rd S Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93B01194R001100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 ? w - 1. What has the systematic review program cost the Agency through CY 1981? 5.4 million dollars 2. What percentage of the documents reviewed have been declassified? Two percent. 3. How much material has been reviewed as of CY 1981? 4.5 million pages 2,254 cubic feet 4. How much remains to be reviewed in order to meet the 1988 goal? 43.5 million pages 21,755 cubic feet 5. What percentage of the 1988 goal would be met if the present - production rate is maintained? 31 percent 6. When would the 1988 goal be completed under the present production 7. What will be the cost of funding the systematic review program through CY 1988 at its present production rate? 16 million dollars 8. What additional costs would be required to meet the 1988 goal? 19 million dollars Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 CRD Briefing of DDA, 21 January 1982 1. Objectives On or Ahead of Target Date/No Problems A. OSS Review (B2) 9e2 c t .I i. I ::moral- ,.;~~i Iyl.+ua Z17c~. Fr. c,- ,Jax-4 S~-~c(c.+?eaw) JJ ,i~, 41RC C/. I= r.`i y~ . B. DCI Certification of CY-1981 Input to DARE (B3) rtioc~ry .:yG r'~rr-[i-r5irt-P~ ~/cic/ GAnr~I.Itir~nc~, C. Planning of Visits to Presidential Libraries (B5) D. Refine Procedures for Consistent Manuscript Review (B7) Cenrr??~4 Iss;-~ crams, 5- -0WWkAL 2. Objectives Not on Target/with Problems A. Systematic Review of 150,000 Pages/Month (Bl) (1) Meeting only 2/3 of objective -- ca. 95,000 pages/month (2) Seven reviewing officers under strength (4 to 5 under for ~- z o~ p,ce, s most of first quarter). not counting 2 contract Lo &,-r GN C.CAIJt-re aI~ it DJ a (3) Empirically, 1 reviewer averages 60-65,000 pages/year B. Inventory of Non--paper Holdings (B4) (1) Hope to complete this week; some microforms, photographic, and ADP media remain. (2) DO records not included (not in ARCINS); most are DDSFT; most are post-1970. (3) Review of motion picture film commenced and about one-half completed; CRP drafted. C. Guidance to NARS on Sensitive, Unmarked Material (B6) (1) Drawn up, sent to DO/IMS for comment, got off track by IMS proposal that DCI talk with Sec/State --- not only overkill, but this larger issue. (2) Now back on track, and IMS has suggested a few changes in guidance; coordinate with DO/PCS, then submit to NARS. D. Completion of Review of FRUS, 1952-54 (1) All volumes given final clearance except IX, which conditionally cleared, and IV. (2) Volume IV --- DO/LA wants to withhold 233 pages in entirety, an untenable position. Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 4P W 3. Planning for the Future of CRD (B8) A. Looking at Central Role in Manuscript Review and Support to Other Agencies who Continue Programs in View of Disinterest within Agency for SR ProgramAs P ze-- e- o r~i CC i ri71J74S>, (1) Can be value in maintaining SR program, even on limited basis, for RM purposes and depending on requirements of ISOO's Implementing Directive for new E.O. (2) Manuscript review trending upward; have drafted proposals for assumption of central role in manuscript review. (3) Difficulty in determining manpower requirements for support to other agencies since their programs not established yet. B. NARS Review Requirements (1) Still unknown; material from all agencies. (2) Review of State Department files, 1950-54, depends on State--NABS agreement on funding. C. DOD (etc.) Review Requirements Still not determined. D. Presidential Library review requirements (B5) (See attached) E. FRUS, 1955-57, Review Requirements (1) Estimate of 28,000 pages to be reviewed in 1982-83. (2) Looking ahead to additional 33,000 pages for 1958-60 series. F. FRUS Supplemental Review Requirements Estimate of 62 cu. ft. or 124,000 pages at this time. G. Manuscript Review Trends.and Requirements (B7) (1) See attached. (2) In manpower terms, still consumes only about 2 officers at current volume. Sfwve (3) Central review would G~rej uireAadditional manpower depending upon volume^ann coordinating requirements. H. OSS Review Requirements As yet unknown, and perhaps unknowable, since will depend upon manuscript activity, FOIA activity, etc. Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 STAT Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7 4P 0 20 January 1982 MANUSCRIPT TRENDS For slightly over a year (5 quarters), from October 1980 to the present, we are averaging nearly 4,600 pages per quarter of manuscript review -- all this is now on an up trend -- and at rate of that up trend, FY-1982 will bring manuscript review page total into the 20,000's. Manuscript review totals can be irregular at any short period of time but overall it is steady enough and growing. Approved For Release 2008/01/09: CIA-RDP93BO1194RO01100150015-7