PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO AMEND THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT (H.R. 2133)

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 21, 2016
Document Release Date: 
December 2, 2008
Sequence Number: 
15
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
March 29, 1984
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3.pdf221.2 KB
Body: 
17 Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 29 March 1984 STAT MEMORANDUM FOR! STAT STAT STAT Legislation Liaison officer Intelligence Community Staff Assistant General Counsel SUBJECT: Proposed Legislation to Amend the Small Business Act (H.R. 2133) This is in response to your request for our views on whether H.R. 2133 could have an impact on the Intelligence Community if enacted. I have had discussions with an attorney in our office who works on contract and procurement matters, and attorneys from NSA, DIA and Defense. The consensus of legal opin- ion appears to be that there is a potential adverse impact from this bill. While the specific degree of the impact may vary among Intelligence Community components depending upon their individual statutory authorities, all agree that there would be problems in implementing the bill within the Intelligence Community as contem- plated by the drafters. You should be aware, however, that CIA strongly believes that its legal authorities are sufficient to exempt its activities from the effects of this bill. I understand you have been asked to respond to Alan C. Chase, who is a staffer for the House Armed Services Committee, and I have attached for your review and consideration comments you may wish to raise with Mr. Chase regarding the potential impact of the bill. However, I would like to caution you that my coordination has been informal, and each interested agency should be given a chance to weigh in formally before presenting these views to Congress as their official positions. In this way any attempt to remedy the problems we have raised can be given careful review to ensure the protection of Community equities. Please do not hesi- tate to call me if you have any questions or comments. STAT cc: LD/OLL Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 INFORMAL COMMENTS ON H.R. 2133 As proposed H.R. 2133 would impose requirements on intelli- el- Bence agencies that would be detrimhactivities andlthat ligence Community contracting and procurement could not be implemented saandrits stringenteadministrative Community. The bill's approach requirements are simply withemethent struc c uresof Intel- ligence Community contracting and p Contracting and procurement activities by ntelligence m thosco ing government agencies. As a rule Intelligence Communityn o t the and procurement activitie~oc~~ehbg~lbecausetthe,indication of the procure goods and services they items procured often may convey the size and scope of the United States intelligence effort. Accordingly, security related re- quirements on Intelligence Community contractsofre stringectsolic- Such contracts are most often not the p itation, as the classified natsrutol izmany ationIntelligence normalmmensyof i contracting activities preven alteanes notifying small businesses of potential contractingsopp r are and precludes compliance with reporting q integral components of the procedures In addition, there are con rovions agerial problems associated with implementation ofFits provisions within components of the Intelligence Community. l by members of the Intelligenceo the estab- lishment of additional layers goals of the H.R. 2133 procedures and would be detrimental to the gsmall business community. It should be noted that the compons f thethetelligencei- Community do not disagree with the philosophy ness Act. Quite the contrhinvolvedninethesentirearangenof subcontracts to small businesses activities. the Intelligence Community contracting and procurement dominant acoi in in fact, small businesses in many areas play a Commun providing goods and servicS billlwouldlbento removelfromolntellis? However, the impact of this gence Community components the flexibility that is neededotoiate obtain goods and services from small necessary for to the intelligence Community's the acquisition of the best support consistent with demands of the proposed acquisition. A number of sections of H.R. 21crestablishmdefiniy threshhold for Small Business Act qualification, guidance regarding qualified bidding lists, or relate to the establishment of small business goals and plans by executive agencies. While those provisions obviously have an impact on Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 overnment- wde, teytdonlsconsequencesttolIntelligence Com- wide they do not have serious contracting. The provisions that raise significant concerns for the Community address: (1) The creation of an apparent mandatory set-aside for small business concerns as it relates to contracting out A-76. (Section 4 (b), page 5, line 12). (2) Creation of a mandatory se0 set-aside or esfo(sprocurement contracts valued at t2 4(e), page 10, line 14). (3) Creation of a presumption for small business concerns contracting between 125,000 but less than $2,000,001 where waiver may be grant by head of the buying activity (Section 4 (e) page 10, line 19). (4) Additional competition requirements for the purchase of spare parts beyond those currently required in existing regulations. (Section 4 (b) page 4, line 14) omprovisions All of the above listed contractingeofficersltoyrespond intelligence Community component requirements by imposing addi- without any measurable tional to Intelligence Community ional bureaucratic steps and procedures increase in government efficiency or enhanced small business con- tracting opportunities. - Component members A-76 contracting-outearena. Suchacontracts liar problem in the requirements and restrictions on usually carry with them security rcontractor employees that may not necessarily existtwit in other government components. These restrictions quite extensive interview of large esm accecandidates securityrstanda contractor to provide employe acceptable from include a smaller Y point. Small businesses by definition g number of candidates and, therefore, may be lsliBelyetoCiecable to perform or to comply with contract provisions. g At76 recognizes these smallencibuses,ib-ut it does neither the n ness any service if acontract rovidehnecessarytclearedepersonnel toe contractor is unable to p satisfy a contract as contemplated under the requirements of H.R. 2133. e Concerns with H.R. to3H.Rre43261inr1982thoCongressional appre- exFrAssed with respect for the Intelligence ciation for the problems that the bill posed Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3 Community subsequently resulted in thenlang1age contained c U.S.C. 638 (e)(2), which exempts the requirements relating to small business set-asides for research and development. While present concerns do not focus on the spe- cific consider sensi- tive area of research and development, the rocurement activit~alland tive aspects of IntelligenCthatnearlPer amendment is eq Y the House Report accompanying of the Small relevant in considering H.R. 2133 and the impact Business Act generally on intelligence activities. Approved For Release 2008/12/02 : CIA-RDP95B00895R000200050015-3