PROJECT EVALUATION FORM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 10, 2000
Sequence Number: 
5
Case Number: 
Content Type: 
FORM
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6.pdf66.13 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6 1 . SPONSOR'S OFFICE: 2. INFORMATION REQUEST DATE: 3. TARGET SITE IDENTIFICATION: 4. PROJECT NUMBER: 5. SOURCE NUMBER: 6. NUMBER OF REPORTS SUBMITTED FOR PROJECT: 7. REPORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND DATES: / / a. Requirements (cite) (ICR/CIR/DIRM 3/DIRM 9) / / b. Initiative Report 9. REASON FOR EVALUATION (select one): / / a. ICR Response / / b. Collectors Request / / c. Selected By Analyst 10 . VALUE OF INFORMATION (select one) : / / a. Major Significant Value (Narrative comment required; include report numbers, specific information in the report which was valuable, and why it was of value.) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6 / / b. Valuable (Narrative comment required; include report numbers, specific information in the report which was valuable, and why it was of value.) / / c. No Value (See Item 12, below.) 11. TYPES OF PRODUCTS TO BENEFIT FROM USE OF REPORTED INFORMATION (select one or more and describe how the products will benefit): / / a. Basic Intelligence / / b. Current Intelligence / / c. Estimative Intelligence / / d. S&T Intelligence 12. REASON INFORMATION IS OF NO VALUE (select one only) : / / a. Too Fragmentary / / b. Duplicative / / c. Untimely / / d. Not Responsive to Tasking Cited Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6 Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6 13. DEGREE OF REQUIREMENT SATISFACTION (select one only) : / / a. Completely Satisfied / / b. Partially Satisfied / / c. Not Satisfied At All 4. REMARKS (comments should include, but not be limited to recommenda- tions for application of this unique intelligence methodology): 15. DISCLOSURE DATA (select one only): / / a. Releasable Evaluation Not Requested / / b. Evaluation Is Not Releasable / / c. Evaluation Is Releasable On a Need-To-Know Basis 16. EVALUATOR'S NAME: 17. EVALUATOR'S OFFICE SYMBOL: 18. DATE EVALUATED: 19. ORIGINATOR OF REQUEST FOR INFORMATION: 20. (Signature of evaluator) Approved For Release 2000/08/07 : CIA-RDP96-00788R001200360005-6