PARAPSYCHOLOGISTS FIRE BACK AT A NATIONAL ACADEMY REPORT THAT CALLED FIELD UNSCIENTIFIC AND EXERIMENTS FLAWED

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP96-00789R002200270001-8
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 4, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 14, 1998
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 14, 1988
Content Type: 
NSPR
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP96-00789R002200270001-8.pdf282.03 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP9 QI7,8,Q,F 2ZQQ ZtDQa1f erEducation ? A5 later enlarged Sor Juana's English-speak- ing audience with translations; Sor Juana Inds de la Cruz: Poems (Bilingual Preis, 1985) and A Woman of Genius: The Intel- lectual Autobiography of Sor Juana Inds de la Cruz (Lime Rock Press, 1982). Ms. Peden, a professor of Spanish at the Uni versity of Missouri at Columbia, also translated Mr. Paz's Sor Juana for Har- vard. The got Juana revival will continue next year, when, for example, as part of its se- ries on Latin American Literature and Cul- ture, Wayne Stale University Press plans to publish Toward a Feminist Understand. Ing of Sor Juana lnAs de to Cruz, edited by Stephanie Merrim, an associate professor of Hispanic studies at Brown, No Access to Formal Education Ms. Merrim's book will address all issue to which she says Mr. Paz pays insufficient attention-Sor Juana's relation to writing by other women, Untold Slstersr Hispanic Nuns in Their Own Works, a literary study of nuns in Spain and in Spanish holdings in the New World during the 16th, 17th, and I8th cen- turies, will also shed light on that matter. Edited by Ms. Arenal of Sullen Island and Stacey Schlau of West Cheater University of Pennsylvania, it is scheduled for publi- cation by the University of New Mexico Press in 1989. The pivotal event, scholars seem to. agree, will be the appearance of Mr. Paz's study in tandem with Mr. Trueblood's an- thology. The anthology contains Sor Juana's best works in poetry and in prose-"First Dream" and "Reply to Sol Philothea," re- spectively-as well as a variety of her oth- er writings, including some excerpts from The Divine Narcissus, one of her several plays. As Mr. Paz shows, those achievements came against considerable odds. Juana was born out of wedlock, proba- bly in 1648, in a village southeast of the city of Mexico (now Mexico City). At about the age of 10 she was sent to live with an aunt in the city. By necessity-as a woman, she had no access to a formal education-she was largely self-taught. She nonetheless pro- Continued on Page A8 Parapsychologists Fire Back at a National Academy Report That Called Field Unscientific and Experiments Flawed By DAVID L. WHEELER Parapsychologists, who investigate such phenomena as extrasensory perception, have fired back at a National Research Council committee that said their field is unscientific and their experiments poorly conducted. Parapsychologists study psychological phenomena not readily explainable by the existing laws of science. They believe some experiments they frequently conduct demonstrate unexplainable effects that point to the possible existence of telepathy or the power of mind over matter. A report by a National Research Council commit- tee, however, said those experiments had been completely Inconclusive and any pos- . hive results were due to-metiodolegical flaws, or "dirty test tubes." Parapsychologists consider the reputa- tion of their field and its future support to be at stake and they have been trying to discredit the National Research Council report, "Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories, and Techniques," re- leased last year by the National Academy Press (The Chronicle, December 9, 1987). The U.S. Army commissioned the report to see If some performance-improvement techniques developed outside the main- stream of science, such as biofeedback, sleep learning, and extrasensory percep- tion, might have some value for soldiers. `No Scientific justification' Not all of the report deals with parapsy- chology, but it said there was "no scien- tific justification from research conducted over a period of 130 years for the existence of parapsychological phenomena." Dean I. Radin, a research psychologist at Princeton University and the president of the Parapsychological Association, says the parapsychologists expected a some- what negative report but felt the National Research Council committee had gone to extremes -including the attempted sup- pression of evidence favorable to parapsy- chology-to try to debunk parapsychologi- cal research. "Reports like the one by the National Research Council tend to influence people who might be interested in funding this work," says Mr. Radin. "They are not in- terested in ridicule any more than anyone else is." Universities Urged to Set Clearer Policies on `Gray Areas' of Scientific Misconduct WASHINGTON A group of scientists, journal editors, lawyers, university administrators, and federal policymakers convened by the In- stitute of Medicine made a series of recom- mendations last week that could give uni- versities a bigger role in encouraging prop- er scientific conduct. A number of reports of scientific fraud this year triggered Congressional investi- gations of some specific cases and prompt- ed suggestions that the federal government should more actively audit the research it pays for. Scientists who fear such interfer- ence in research and who have some con- cerns of their own about ethics in science are beginning to re-examine their research practices. Some universities are also tak- ing a new look at their promotion and ten- ure policies to see if the policies are en- couraging rapid-fire publication that could be promoting bad science. The Institute of Medicine, which is part of the National Academy of Sciences, has put together a committee on scientific re- sponsibility that is preparing a report for the National Institutes of Health. The com- mittee organized last week's workshop, at which speakers expressed widely diver- gent views on what to do about preventing scientific misconduct-not just the blatant Continued on Page A10 ?~~ raw urn, Dean 4 Radln: "Reports like the one by the National Research Council tend to Influence people who might be Interested in funding this work" Ray Hyman, a professor of psychology at the University of Oregon and one of two people on the research council's commit- tee who evaluated parapsychology, de- scribes the parapsychologists' criticisms of the committee's report as "kind of sil- ly.., Some Experiments Worth Following "The parapsychologists should be re- joicing," he says. "This was the first gov- ernment committee that said their work should be taken seriously." The report recommended that the Army continue to "monitor" some parapsycho- logical research and occasionally visit some laboratories, including one at Prince- ton University. The committee said the re- search worth following included "Ganz- feld" experiments intended to measure te- lepathy and experiments in which research subjects try to mentally force a random- number-generating device to emit numbers that are not random. Mr. Hyman says the parapsychologists Continued on Page A10 Bones t f the `Supersaurus , Superconductivity Advance; Professionals and Part-Time Work A field worker sketches a twill that researchers say belongs to the gigantic "Supersaurus" dinosaur. Researchers from Brigham Young University have unearthed what they say is the largest complex of dinosaur pelvic bones that have ever been dis- covered. The massive fossils include several (used vertebrae and the pelvic bones of what was believed to be a plant-eating Sapersaurus dinosaur. The Brigham Young researchers esti- mated that the dinosaur measured 120 feet in length and weighed between 20 and 30 tons when it died some 135 mil- lion years ago. The complex of bones, which meas- ured 73 Inches by 52 Inches, was uncov- ered August 18 at Dry Mesa Quarry near Delta, Colo. Researchers said the new find was important because it would help to set- tie the debate over how Supersaurus was related to a smaller dinosaur known as Diplodocus. -KIM A. MCDONALD Superconductor Advance Reported at U. of Arkansas Two researchers at the University of Arkansas at Fayetteville have reported a safer method of making a thallium- based high-temperature superconduc- tor. a material that, when chilled, is capable of transmitting electricity with no resistance. Thallium, a poisonous el- ement used in rat poisons, appears to be a necessary element in the preparation of superconductors with the most desir- able properties. A thallium-barium-calcium copper Continued on Page A8 Approved For Release 2000/08/08 : CIA-RDP96-00789R002200270001-8 Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited. A 10 ? The Chronicle of Higher Education ? September 14, 1988 Ap roved, For Rase 2x00/48/O8 : CIA-~2RP96-00789R002200270001-8 Pa t ~syC o ogistS Sport to nticism ie cl -e? the "sender" cannot mark the Picture in a way a eceiver" Coninswd from Page AS are pushing for acceptance by other researchers too soon. Many parapsy- ehologisns are well trained, he says, but are often not following widely ac. cepted atandards for experiments. "I think their experiments should be an embarrassment to them," he says. "They need to go back to their lab- oratories and clean up their act." The Parapsychological Associa- tion, which has about 250 members, has replied to the research council's committee with a 29-page critique of its report. Large Body of Fissdings Cited The critique says the "commit- tee's conclusion far outstrips the scope of its investigation.... Para- psychologists have accumulated a large body of experimental findings that (a) suggest important new means of human interaction with their envi- ronment and (b) cannot be plausibly attributal to known conventional mechanisms." In one kind of experiment, cited both by many parapsychologists and images that were in their mind during by their critics as being the beat work the Canzfeld state, If the receiver parapsychologists have done, re- picks the image that the sender was search subjects are placed in a reclin- shown, it is considered a "hit" or a ins chair in a soundproofed room positive result. with "while noise" piped into their ears and goggles or halves of Ping. Pons balls placed over their eyes so The experiments vary in their ex. they see a uniform field of light. The =I design, but Mr. Rodin says that, blandness of their sensory environ- taken as a group, they demonstrate ment puts them into a reportedly that "information can be transmitted pleasant, altered mental state, or in ways we don't understand yet." "Ganelcld." Some parapsycholo- The H:a.c. committee's Mr. Hy- gists believe this state makes the re- man attributes research results imli. search subjects more receptive to catin`lelfpathy or other paranormal telepathic messages. communication to poorly designed In a separate room, a researcher experiments. Hi says that, if pant- selects a videotape or a still picture normal communication is to be, from a group and shows another re- proved, experimenters first have to search subject an Image, which he or be certain that the selection of images she tries to transmit mentally to the is completely random. No such proof person in the Ganzfeld state. After a is given in Ganzfeld experiments, he set time, the "receiver," or person in says, and poor methods of randomly the Gaszfeld state, is brought out of selecting an image are used, such as She state and is shown the same hand shuffling. group of videotapes or pictures. He also says the experimenters The receivers are asked to pick the should use two sets of the same im- image that most closelywiates to the ages-be theynsill pictures or video- New this fall. From ACE/Macmillan. d4, , , a splendidly rich, robust and realistic account.. ,"* ROBERT L. RIYTON PHILANTHROPY VOLUNTARY ACLTON FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD Foreword by Richard Lyman Philanthropy Robert Payton writes in this provocative and enlighlening book, is "America's most distinctive virtue: And now one of philanthropy's most distinguished leaders offers a powerful statement of Its purpose and a critical inventory of its potential. Drawing on wisdom gleaned from a life devoted to advancing the mission of philanthropy, Payton brings into bold relief the distinctive qualities of the philanthropic tradition, its changing role in American society. And he confronts many of philanthropy's most pressing challenges-from the ethics of giving to new management models for voluntary organizations. In this probing. practical, and visionary book, Robert Payton de-finest he essence of philanthropy. And emerges as its most eloquent voice. "Bob Payton [is] an extraordinarily talented and experienced practitioner and scholar of philanthropy... expands our vision of the promise of philanthropy"-'John G. Simon, Yale Urriversir ' 304 pages ? $19.95 An essential guide... long overdue." * DAVID W STEWART and HENRY A. SPILLE DIPLOMA MILLS DEGREES OF FRAUD Foreword by Fred M. Hechinger This groundbreaking book explores the shadowy underworld of higher education-and casts new light on institutions that offer millions of Americans fraudulent or academically deficient degrees. After six years of research by the American Council On Education's Center for Adult Learning and Educational Credentials, Center executives David Stewart and Henry Spille expose the techniques diploma mills use to lure prospec- tive students-and show how diploma mills can operate legally. Filled with dozens of real-world examples, their book is an exlraordinaty look at a serious threat to American society. Therein more: a clear, concise guide to what accreditation means; help on distinguishing legitimate nontraditional educationalirugrams from fraudulent ones; and workable recommendations for fighting this multimillion dollar danger to the quality and integrity of American higher education. 'An essential guide for anyone who wants to learn how to distinguish legitimate from fraudulent degree granting institutions" -"Fred M. Hechinger, The New York Times FourrdatioH, Inc. 272 pages ? $19.95 At bookstores. Or Order toll-free with your c redit card: 1(800) 323.7443 The American Council on Education/Macmillan Series on Higher Education MACMILLAN PUBLISHING COMPANY A Division of Macmillan, Inc. ? 866 Third Avenue ? New York, NY 10022 might notice. Mr. Hyman says other cues also might make it possible for receivers to detect which image was used unless the experimenter has two seta of images. Ina second kind of common para. psychology experiment, research subjects try mentally to influence machines that generate numbers ran- domly. In the usual version of these experiments, an electronic device generates a random series of zeroes and ones, and the subject of the ex. periment tries to push the string of numbers mentally either in the direc- tion of more zeroes or more ones. Mr. Raclin, who has analyzed 597 random-number-generator experi- ments done by 68 researchers, says the results Indicate that the random- number generators are somehow be- ing influenced away from random. Bess. "The statistics indicate that the re- sults are so far away from chance that chance Is not a possible explana- tion," he says. "I'm not saying it's something psychic, but there is some artifact there. And so Per I haven't been able to find any normal artifact that might explain the results." Once again, Mr. Hyman says the parapsychologists don't have enough proof that the random-number gener. ators are really random, and without that proof he says the experiments we meaningless. The parapsychologists also had some political quarrels with the Na- tional Research Council's report. They charged that the committee chairman had asked the author of a background paper commissioned for the report to withdraw hie conclusion that the Ganzfetd experiments are meth logi hodocallysound. T chairman. John A. Swets, chief scientist at Bolt Beranek and Newman, a Cambridge, Mass., con- sulting firm, says he did ask Robert Rosenthal, a professor of social psy- chology at Harvard University, if he would eliminate his conclusions about the Ganrfeld experiments from his paper. Mr. Swets says the com- mittee preferred its own analysis of the Ganzfeld experiments. "We thought the quality of our analysis was better, and we didn't see much point in putting out mixed signals," says Mr. Swell. "I didn't feel we were obliged to represent every point of view." Mr. Rosenthal said he thought it was "inappropriate" of Mr. Swets to ask him and Monies J. Harris, a grad- uate student, to withdraw their con- clusions about the Ganzfeld experi- ments. The conclusions were ulti- mately kept in the background paper but not included in the report. Makeup of Committee Criticized The parapsychologists also say the committee was unfairly stacked with avowed critics of parapsychology and should have had at least one parapsychologist on it. Mr. Swels says the committee didn't have any members who were advocates for the performance-en- hancemeet methods being evaluated. Mr. Hyman, who is a cognitive psy- chologist interested in the subject of human error, says he has written about parapsychology since the 1950's. "I'm one of the few critics who knows them, who reads their lit- oratore, and who goes to their con- ventions." He says he is neutral. "I don't care about parapsychology," he says. "To me it's a very dull topic." Even if parapsychologists discover the existence of special mental pow- ers outside of what is sow known, Mr. Hyman says he believes the powers will be so elusive and so sub- tle that they can't be controlled. If anything, he says, parapsychologists will only find a "cosmic hiccup." Copies of the Parapsychological Association's critique, "Reply to the National Research Council Study on Parapsychology," are available for $2 from the Parapsychological Asso- ciation, P.O. Box 12236. Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709. Policies on Scientific Misconduct Convinced from Page AS fabrication of data, but sloppy re- search practices. Despite the differences, six panels that met for two days came up with some specific recommendations for preventing misconduct and poor re- search practices. The panels recom- Inended that universities have: ? Specific policies requiring scien- tists to keep data to support pub- lished papers and encouraging scien- tists to give the data to others who want to check their results. ^ Guidelines for the heads of lab- oratories and the mentors of research trainees about their responsibilities to trainees. Such guidelines would make sure students and trainees knew who was supposed to be train- ing them and whom they could turn to for help. Some training in the eth- ics of science and good research practices might also be required, ? Written policies making it clear that those who are not directly in. volved with research should not be named as the authors of scientific pa. pen. The policies would end the practice in some laboratories of auto- matically making the head of a lab- oratory an author on every paper coming oat of the laboratory. Arnold S. Relman, editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, spoke in support of a larger role for the institutions where scientists are based. "Institutions have to take more of a role in making sure good publication practices are followed," he said. "We editors cannot possibly investigate and insure the validity of every author's time on each paper." An enhanced role for universities and other research institutions was not supported by everyone at the workshop. Some scientists argued that the en- couragement of good research prac- tices should come from the laborato- ry itself, without outside interference by the university. The Institute of Medicine work- shop was intended to look at "gray areas" where blatant fraud is not in- volved but where research practices might still be questionable, William Raub. deputy director of the National Institutes of Health, said much attention had been given to big scientific sins, such as plagia- rism, but less attention had been giv- en to the little sins-sloppy record. keeping. poor supervision of re- searchers, selective reporting of data, publishing the same data in many journals, and the use of the "least publishable unit." That term refers to scientists who write papers the moment they have enough significant data, instead of waiting to confirm those data or ex- pand on them. Thera is no apparent consensus on how bad these sins arc, what the standards should be, or if there should be standards," said Mr. Raub. -DAVID L. WHEELER. Reproduced with par tpisevie fF:,a*ReLea-seF2iiQG/0tWO c GiIAtrR?R96-00789ROO2200270001-8