PROS AND CONS OF NFAC VERSUS INTERAGENCY PRODUCTION

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP98S00099R000501020016-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 23, 2012
Sequence Number: 
16
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 16, 1979
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP98S00099R000501020016-5.pdf82.55 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/23: CIA-RDP98S00099R000501020016-5 ( C 16 October 1979 Memorandum for SRP Subject: Pros and Cons of NFAC Versus Interagency Production 1. There are a number of pract,.cal reasons why NFAC analysts and managgers prefer to do an N}~~AC intelligence product instead of an interagency product for the NIO. These include: --The product can erera' ly.? be done more quick' 11,r. --The analyst gets better credit for the product, including his own byline. --The production office ge'_-s more credit for the product and the effort which went into it. --Analyst performance recogn tion -Ind rewards, in terms of efficiency reports and promotion, generally are greater for an NFAC product as opposed to an NIO product. --The NFAC office prefers to control its own production assets (analysts) as opposed to turning them over to the NIO. And the analyst usually prefers to work for someone who officially evaluates his performance rather than someone who does not. --NFAC offices have had bad experiences with a number of NIO products in terms of over-expenditure of time and effort, often with a poor end result. They therefore prefer not to squander scarce resources on an uncertain effort. 2. Despite these numerous factors in favor of an NFAC product from an analyst and managerial perspective, there are some reasons for favoring an NIO product. These include: --Part _i_cipatio.n in an interagency product can give the analyst greater access to senior officials in the CIA (including the DCI), other members of the Community, and the policymaker. --There is gcni.ral analyst recognition that an ii:teragency product is more ir.portant and can have great ear impact than an NFAC product. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/23: CIA-RDP98S00099R000501020016-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/23: CIA-RDP98S00099R000501020016-5 --NFAC analysts and managers both recognize the danger of presenting uncoordinated data or opinions to the policy- maker, particularly if there is an awareness of an opposing point of view. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2012/05/23: CIA-RDP98S00099R000501020016-5 STAT