NOTICE: In the event of a lapse in funding of the Federal government after 14 March 2025, CIA will be unable to process any public request submissions until the government re-opens.

THE BROODING HAWKS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP99-00498R000100060031-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
1
Document Creation Date: 
December 20, 2016
Document Release Date: 
June 13, 2007
Sequence Number: 
31
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 10, 1977
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP99-00498R000100060031-4.pdf109.78 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2007/06/14: CIA-RDP99-004 NEW YORK TIMES The Brooding Hawks But there is a new element, an Intel- Mr. Warhke articulated exceptionally lectual one. It includes strong support- well, under the pressures of the Senate By Anthony LeWiS ers-of Israel who since the Yom Kippur hearing, the reasons for thinking that War have become a significant factor effective arms limitation would make SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 9-Tfiere is in the growing support for larger U.S. this country more secure, not- less: a peculiar, almost venomous, intensity defense budgets. The magazine Com- He gave: the example of the U.S. in some of the opposition to Paul mentary is at the heart of this ele- decision years ago to develop and' Warnke as President--`Carter's chief ment along with such Senators as deploy missiles with multiple, in arms control negotiator-a'. feeling Henry Jackson and Daniel Patrick ; dependently-targeted heads: MIRV's. beyond the usual policy disagreement Moynihan. The New Republic, now a ' When the Soviets inevitably followed in a democracy. It. is as if the oppo, leading pro-Israel voice, made a sus- suit, we ended up feeling less secure nents have made him a symbol of tained attack on Paul Warnke before than if we had' managed Ito -stop the something they dislike so much thaC the election. development on both sides. they want to destroy him. '-. The military-intellectual complex, it - Of course it is not so easy to' get' The feeling was in the air of the could be called. It is symbolized by effective, verifiable agreements. But Senate Foreign Relations Committee the recently formed Committee on the the alternative is a competition with hearings on the Warnke nomination,, Present Danger, whose members in- its own Gresham's Law: making the admirably broadcast in extended sum-; clude John Connally, Lane Kirkland of arms balance progressively more ex- mary by Public Television. It was the A.F.L.-C.I.O., Paul Nitze-and Nor- penive and less stable. Congressman there in the impassioned critical man Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, Stratton falted Mr. Warnke for having testimony of Representative Samuel opposed such weapons systems as and Saul Bellow.: MIRV's and the antiballistic missile-- Stratton and in the letter from Paull; The common,thread of this coali- Nitze opp a osing Mr. Warnke, his a if new hardware automatically pro- duced intense' more security. History teaches former Pentagon colleague. And it had j intentions. Conhern about a nation as that it does not. been there in the anonymous anti- powerful, secretive and authoritarian Warnke memorandum circulated be-: p I President Carter made very similar fare the hearing, as the U.S.S.R.. is right. Only a fool-; points, at his press conference, about The nomination does not seem to believes that Soviet leaders are a. the potential gains for true security be threatened in . the Senate. Mr, kindly lot who will make the world a and arms agreements. He made clear Carter took the occasion of his first better place if we just trust them. But his own commitment 'to the effort-- Presidential press conference, on the it is outrageous- and dangerous-to= one much deeper than I had under- im 1 an oze favorin arm limitation day the Warnke hearings began, to reaffirm his support of the nominee and to endorse in remarkably strong terms- the. Warnke view of. the advantages of effective arms limitation. The intensity of feeling of the oppo- sition side is nevertheless important. It signals a policy disagreement so fundamental that any imaginable arms limitation agreement with the Soviet Union will face powerful resistance. And it signals the rise of a new mili- tant coalition on national security issues. - The new coalition has many strands. The traditional right is there, along with unreconstructed Vietnam hawks and the labor and industrial and mili- tary elements usually favoring higher defense spending- p y y = g s stood. The fact that he has those views is such a fool. is doubtless what so greatly agitates- The misrepresentation of Mr.. the critics of Paul Warnke. Warnke's views is instructive in thism . Mr. Carter now knows the political regard. Critics cited a past statement. resistance.he faces in the arms field. by him to the effect that American He will be strengthened by having in actions had inspired "the Soviet Union, his Administration 'Adm. Stansfield to spend its substance on, military' Turner, his C.I.A. choice, .a military manpower and weaponry." man of unusual breadth of intellect- . But the mainspring of the super- -and James Schlesinger, one skeptic- power arms race is precisely that each about Soviet intentions who argues side's new weapons systems inspire. Policy without .personal assault. He the other's. Mr. 'Warnke was looking has in Mr. Warnke a man of incisive at the side that we can almost im-:mind who can stay cool under pres- mediately affect: ourselves. The point' sure. And in the end the President-may. he was mak ng-has been making for find, as John Kennedy did, that careful years-is that we Americans, believing, steps toward peace generate their own ourselves rational, should try the first popular support, steps to stop the spiral of increased. Approved For Release 2007/06/14: CIA-RDP99-00498R000100060031-4