IMPLICATIONS OF THE ARAB SUMMIT

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
May 10, 2010
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 6, 1973
Content Type: 
MEMO
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4.pdf234.47 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/05/10: LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4 SECRET OCI No. 2731/73 6 December 1973 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Implications of the Arab Summit. The leaders of all Arab states, with the exception of Libya and Iraq,,met in Algiers on 26 November for a three- day conference to discuss the military and political aspects. of the current Arab-Israeli situation. Decisions made in Al ,per's were :essentially a' confirmation o s 1 ions ad o ted 11 e -sew e~-in the privacy of the i atera contacts that mo` s'" t'rab' heads of state prefer as a medium for their diplo- macy. The decisions will influence future Arab policies only to the extent that they accord with the views of the individual leaders. The summit as such will thus have little impact on the forthcoming peace conference. By gathering the Arab leaders together in the same conference hail, ,it neverthele'ss' served to' expose more c1earl -- -for the benefit o ose who may have had doubts ts- lust which' states control the course of events and how far-those states are prepared to gq to accom- On issues of war and tone; __on matters ot oil 'an eaee,.president Sadat 'set the omina e . n eac case, pola:ay~iac~ been determined before . rmm It convened, the other leaders knew it, and efforts he su to steer a difference course,,if made at all, were easily turned aside. Sadat went to the summit having decided to press for- ward with diplomatic efforts. to resolve the Arab-Israeli dis- pute. No apparent attempt was made to. dissuade him,.despite continuing doubts among, for instance,,the Algerians. No ,one 'seri~ousl challenged the limited objectives Sadat and' e carerui.ly con- trolled Cairo and Algiers press ispatcies on summit pro- ceedings,.and virtually all speeches during the conference,. meticulously referred throughout to the restoration of "occupied" Arab lands, thus consciously setting limits to Arab territorial ambitions. Apparently -even an earlier SECRETJ No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/05/10 : LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/05/10: LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4 SECRE.TJ 25X1 resolution passed by the foreign ministers' conference affirm- ing the Arab character of Jerusalem was watered down, report- edly over.Faysal's objections,.to call only for the city's liberation from Israeli control. Sadat'.s success in maintaining control over. negotiating policy was matched by Faysal's success in oil matters. Al- though there is some indication that producers not willing to sustain the financial losses of a cutback greater than 25 percent will not be forced to institute the progressive five-percent monthly cuts, raysa,l himself- emerged from the summit still, ublicly gommi tte maintain i:s decre ee 3`11 . Japan had already been agreed upon unilaterally by the Saudis. The summit meeting, ,by not seriously challenging the established policies of either Sadat or Faysal, thus endorsed the leadership role each had already assumed. On the ques- tion of negotiations, Sadat received an implicit mandate to attend the peace conference and to negotiate or not 'as he sees fit. He. would have done the same had the summit not met at-all, and it is doubtful that even the presence of Libya and Iraq. would have altered his determination. If the summit had little effect on Sadat's.negotiating policy in general, the gathering did point up one'area in' which'..Sadat will be the follower rather than the leader in setting Arab policy. With regard to the Jordanian-fedayeen Faysal the summs s action to ease the res rM ions on less. If, 'there is, to be a relaxat'.ion,' it will be decided b' by President Bourguiba and of ers--inclu ing, by one account, Egypt--to induce a slight relaxation apparently proved fruit- ma ey controls the West Bank after it has been removed from Israeli control,.and he will gauge his support for the feda- yeen or for Jordan according to its effect on Egypt's own interests. Where those interests cease to be involved,, neither party can-expect firm backing. The summit's designation of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as' the sole representative of the Pales- tinians was a matter of, pragmatism for Sadat, if not for the other Arab leaders. Bringing the fedayeen along on the c follow tfi-e_-trend of ou -si o pinion. He pro ly has little- real interest in o u i. 25X1 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/05/10: LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/05/10: LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4 SECRET negotiating track and thereby undercutting their ability to sabotage a peace settlement:is critical to Sadat, and it was undoubtedly this concern that motivated his vote.for the PLO at Jordan's expense. Beyond this,Sadat has'lon made it clear that ''he will note allow the Pales Minlan ues ,on to 1n er` er:e ;MET We" .e ggYp ian' as'pec s: O' ' a sett emen an 09t, once negotiations begin,,the fedayeen must arge y fend for themselves against Israel, Jordan,.and the US. The. same pragmatism applies,,in Sadat's view, to King Husayn. Sadat does not intend to abandon the King; nor apparently-does he believe that Husayn should or will carry through on his threat to boycott the peace conference. He will work on Husayn,,as he worked on the fedayeen, to follow along on a unified Arab negotiating track. As with the fedayeen, ,however, ,S-adat's Is','su ortt 'for Husa n_ extends 'only so, far, 'as Jordan's 'interests ouch on his own. '-- When nego- a.a ions are under way, a w17:1 a ance e weight of Arab support for the Palestinians, and Arab willingness to abandon Jordan, against the weight of Israeli opposition to the fedayeen and the US position on the.Palestinians. His own position will be governed by his perceptions of which way the scale is tipping and how this affects his abili.ty.to regain Egyptian territory. The summit may have crystallized Sadat's thinking on the Palestinian issue as it-affects negotiations, but ,it did not significantly alter his previous views and it will not .alter his willingness or ability to negotiate. Nor, for that matter, did the meeting change the policies of the other Arab leaders on this or any other question involved. in the negotiations. The Jordanian-PLO conflict was, the most -s ign'ificant iss uue in ion ante issue will be resolved without reference to-the-;um- mi.t's decisions. .The conference `thus will have. an i act on negotiations t ion at the ta37 . o that, it h.as: highlighted likely _obstac es' to' rog ea. ress. They No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/05/10: LOC-HAK-199-3-4-4