CABLE TO ALEXANDER HAIG FROM R. T. KENNEDY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
LOC-HAK-248-2-22-0
Release Decision: 
RIPLIM
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
January 11, 2017
Document Release Date: 
August 6, 2010
Sequence Number: 
22
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
December 22, 1972
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon LOC-HAK-248-2-22-0.pdf231.75 KB
Body: 
No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/08/06: LOC-HAK-248-2-22-0 00 w1E22 DE WTE 4610 3570257 0 2202502 DEC 7:2 FM R.T. KENNEDY To . GENERAL HAIG TUNA IG 5 S E C R E T SENSITIVE 'WH2'9946 TOHAIG 53 DECEMBER 21, 1972 TO: GENERAL HAIG FROM: COLONEL KENNEDY .. W THE BRIEF CARVER PAPER ON THIEU, WHICH I MENTIONED IN MY E&RIIER MESSAGE, IS ATTACHED. THE YS REFERENCE, HAS BEEN SENT SEPARATELY To YOU. WARM REGARD. 1. MR.-KENNEDY RELAYED THIS MORNING (2) DECEMBER) YOUR REQUEST ERR AN ASSESSMENT OF PRESIDENT THIEU'S CURRENT ATTITUDE WITH RESPECT To THE WHOLE SUBJECT OF NEGOTIATIONS AND OF HIS PROBABLE BFHAVIIIR WITH REGARD TO COOPERATING IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SETTLF- ME'NT WE MAY BE ABLE TO NEGOTIATE WITH HANOI. ACTUALLY, MUCH OF TN GROUND WAS COVERED IN THE 12 DECEMBER MESSAGE RESPONDING TO YOUR REQUEST FROM PARIS (RELAYED BY GENERAL HAIG) FOR A DETAILER 'ASSESS.MENT OF THIEU'S NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEECH. . WHEN I GAVF THAT 12 DECEMBER MEMORANDUM TO GENERAL HAIL, AND AFTER WE HAD DISCUSSED IT, HE INDICATED THAT HE WAS G RELAY, IT TO YOU IN, ITS ENTIRETY VIA SOME WHITE HOUSE I DO NOT XNDW THE NUMBER OR NOMENCLATURE' OF THE CABLE BY WHICH IT WAS SENT TO YOU IN PARIS, BUT A COPY OF ITS TEXT IS. APPENDED HERETO. 2. IN THIS GENERAL SPHERE, THERE HAVE BEEN TWO DEVELOPMENTS SINCE 12 DECEMBER THAT ARE,LIKELY TO IMPACT ON THIEU#,S ATTITUDE OR BEHAVIOR: THE RESUMPTION OF U.S. AERIAL ATTACKS NORTH OF THE 20TH PARALLEL (WITH ATTENDANT RESEEDING OF THE MINES BLOCKING .NtTRTH VIETNAM'S PORTS.) AND GENERAL' HAIO'S VISIT TO SAIGON. REPORTING 3. WE HAVE NOT YET RECEIVED ANY _____________________ OWN THIEU'S MOOD SINCE THE BOMBING WAS R UMED, B VIOUSLY WILL .HAVE WELCOMED THIS MOVE. HIS RESULTANT GOOD HUMOR MAY MAKE HIM SOMEWHAT EASIER TO TALK TO, BUT HE WILL NOT NECESSARILY' BECOME END PAGE ONE MORE SUBSTANTIVELY FLEXIBLE. INSTEAD, HE. WILL ALMOST. CERTAINLY FEEL THAT OUR ACCEPTANCE OF THE ADVISABILITY OR NECESSITY OF SUCH MORI/CDF C05141064 No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/08/06: LOC-HAK-248-2-22-0 *#* S E C R E I ****S COPY AM ACTION VINDICATES 1I'S.EARLIER NEGATIVE ESTIMATE OF HANOI'S "SERIOUSNESS" OR GOOD FAITH AND THAT, IN THE EVENT. HE WAS WISE NOT TO LET HIMSELF BE STAMPEDED. 4. I CANNOT PROFITABLY COMMENT ON. THE IMPACT OF GENERAL HAIG'S VISIT SINCE I DO NOT KNOW WHAT HE SAID TG PRESIDENT TH!EU, rip, VICE VERSA, THE CONTENTS OF PRESIDENT NIXON'S LETTER OR THOSE OF THIEU'S REPLY. THE ONE REFLECTION WE HAVE SO FAR RECEIVED ON T14 M Of THIS VISIT IS CONTAINED IN YS-531, 21 DECEMBER 1972.? KHIEM'S COMMENTS Ttl SENIOR U. S. OFFICIALS ALWAYS SELF-SERVING, BUT IN THIS INSTANCE KH.IEM'S REMARKS ABOUT THI AND THE LATTER+S? REACTIONS, HAVE THE RING OF AUTHENTICITY. 'a". KHIEM'S COMMENTS PROVIDE 'A MODEST MEASURE OF INDEPENI) SUPPORT FOR THE ATTACHED PAPER'S CENTRAL THESIS: THAT THIFU PROBABLY PREPARED (AT.LEAST PRIVATELY) TO RE COOPERATIVE -- EVENTUALLY ... ON ALL ISSUES SAVE ONE. GIVEN HIS PSYCHOLOGY, U NT Is TEMPERAMENT AND POLITICAL POSITION HE CANNOT AND ALMOST CERTAINLY WILL NOT SIGN AWAY THE GVN'S LEGAL RIGHT TO EXISTENCE. KHIEM COVERS THIS POINT WITH THE'SOMEWHAT MISLEADING PHRASE.OF "THE JURIDICAL PRESENCE OF NORTH VIETNAMESE TROOPS I N SOUTH VIETNAM." THE TROOPS, OF COURSE, BOTHER THIFU AND HE OBVIOUSLY WANTS THEM OUT. THE REAL ISSUE, HOWEVER-9 IS NOT THE NORTHERN TROOPS BUT THE. JURIDICAL CONCEPT OF "VIETNAM" THAT DEFINES THEIR STATUS. THIEU CANNOT, AND WILL' NOT, OFFICIALLY ENDORSE THE CONCEPT THAT AND HENCE, BY DEFINITION, NORTH VIETNAMESE TROOPS IN THE SOUTH ARE. NOT "FOREIGN." THE REASONS WHY THIS IS, AND (TO TMIEU) HAS To BE, A CENTRAL ISSUE ON WHICH THIEU FEELS HE CANNOT BUDGE ARE. DISCUSSED IN THE ATTACHED PAPER. 630 PSNxO195S 01, DEC No Objection to Declassification in Part 2010/08/06: LOC-HAK-248-2-22-0